MNF: The Legend of Riverboat Ron Continues - Page 65 - Sporting Events and Fantasy Sports

Two Plus Two Forums Sports and Games Sporting Events

MNF: The Legend of Riverboat Ron Continues

Closed Subscribe

...

Page 65 of 76

First

15 45 55 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 75

Last

Page 65 of 76

First

15 45 55 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 75

Last

11-19-2013 , 01:20 AM

#1601

Palo

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 10,563

If only Brady had thrown the ball reasonably close instead of grossly short. He's got a 6'7" TE in the back of the endzone and throws a ball that is landing in the middle of the endzone. That ball should have been on a trajectory to be 7-9 feet off the ground as it crossed the back line and landing 5-10 yards beyond the endzone. It was under thrown by 10-15 yards. Lol Brady.

11-19-2013 , 01:21 AM

#1602

bigt2k4

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 15,296

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dudd

Seems like it's the same rule where a deflected pass nullifies PI, just that this time it was caught

Correct

11-19-2013 , 01:23 AM

#1603

shaft88

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 6,569

lollll

11-19-2013 , 01:23 AM

#1604

Prawney

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 5,646

Im not a fan of games ending on calls like that so i dont mind that it ended up not being a penalty.

Saying that im pretty sure it was a penalty.

11-19-2013 , 01:24 AM

#1605

nath

the second coming of the second coming

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 69,114

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiddyBang

Oh cause if he wasn't being held the best te in the game doesn't make a play for the ball? Get the **** out of here

The best TE in the game might have made a play for the ball, but he didn't play tonight, so we'll never know.

11-19-2013 , 01:24 AM

#1606

bigt2k4

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 15,296

Quote:

Originally Posted by jay0582

LOL no, the DPI occurred while the ball was in the air , before the interception. Thus possibly aiding the player in the interception. No where near the same scenario or same rule.

incorrect, it's not about timing, but path of the football and distance

11-19-2013 , 01:26 AM

#1607

horrorshow83

banned

Join Date: Sep 2011 Posts: 6,304

For those saying no DPI. If CAR#38 is nowhere near the play, is it DPI? Holding?

11-19-2013 , 01:27 AM

#1608

bigt2k4

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 15,296

Quote:

Originally Posted by nutshot2

karak making some terrible posts right now

Ya, quoting a ref who got fired because he was awful at his job is pretty bad

11-19-2013 , 01:27 AM

#1609

nath

the second coming of the second coming

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 69,114

Quote:

Originally Posted by SirRawrsALot

I've read enough.

Lol at people saying it wasn't DPI. Yeah the ball was uncatchable, but one might argue that the biggest reason for that would be the minor fact that a DB was bear hugging Gronk?

No, the biggest reason the ball was uncatchable is because of where Brady threw it. See below:

Quote:

Originally Posted by __harmless

Gronk's never catching that.

Kuechly could have not been on the field at all and this ball is getting intercepted. If Kuechly makes the play on the ball, then yeah, it's DPI, but the ball is nowhere close to Kooch or Gronk.

11-19-2013 , 01:29 AM

#1610

Uncle Wimp

adept

Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 1,174

Quote:

Originally Posted by horrorshow83

For those saying no DPI. If CAR#38 is nowhere near the play, is it DPI? Holding?

I think this is the key point the Jerry Austin was making, that there was a defender to catch or deflect the ball well in advance of the receiver. If 38 isn't there and the ball just lands in the middle of the end zone, they don't pick up the flag.

11-19-2013 , 01:29 AM

#1611

Searix

NFL Swami Overlord

Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 19,233

Rated thread 5 stars

11-19-2013 , 01:30 AM

#1612

Palo

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 10,563

Quote:

Originally Posted by horrorshow83

For those saying no DPI. If CAR#38 is nowhere near the play, is it DPI? Holding?

It's interference in that case. The ball would have landed a yard or so from Gronk's feet. However, a tipped pass or one that is picked off where the receiver never had any chance at catching the ball cannot be interference.

11-19-2013 , 01:30 AM

#1613

Francis_MH

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 10,386

Seriously though, WTF is Kuechly doing/thinking there?

11-19-2013 , 01:31 AM

#1614

GREEAR10

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 70,909

Cam Newton math LOL

11-19-2013 , 01:32 AM

#1615

vhawk01

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 31,866

Yeah it's a terrible play by keuchly bailed out by terrible Tom Brady throw

11-19-2013 , 01:32 AM

#1616

Palo

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 10,563

Quote:

Originally Posted by vhawk01

Yeah it's a terrible play by keuchly bailed out by terrible Tom Brady throw

Exactly this.

11-19-2013 , 01:33 AM

#1617

LimpDitka

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Jun 2010 Posts: 4,234

Cam Newton math: We only had 6 possessions, what is that 2 uhhhh 1 uhhhh 2 a quarter?

They actually had 7, but one was at the end of the second so really doesnt matter much, im really surprised they only had 6 possessions thats crazy.

11-19-2013 , 01:35 AM

#1618

Goodie

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 5,694

Quote:

Originally Posted by nath

No, the biggest reason the ball was uncatchable is because of where Brady threw it. See below:

Kuechly could have not been on the field at all and this ball is getting intercepted. If Kuechly makes the play on the ball, then yeah, it's DPI, but the ball is nowhere close to Kooch or Gronk.

Are you high? Kuechly starts making contact at the 2 yard line. If he didn't interfere, many things other than an interception COULD have happened. Uncatchable needs to be completely 100%, undebatable. Anyone who watched that replay and thinks it's 100% undebatable that Gronk couldn't have gotten back and done something to disrupt that play, needs to re-examine their eyesight or mentality.

11-19-2013 , 01:36 AM

#1619

Francis_MH

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 10,386

Lawnmowers are starting to fly thinking about why Rivergoat Chili even had Kuechly defending the best receiver on the field when he knew he was likely to throw a pass to him in the end zone (with no other options BUT to throw it into the end zone with 3 seconds left). You don't have someone better at playing man coverage than the guy who thinks bear-hugging the receiver and not even bothering to look for the ball is the best way to play defense?

11-19-2013 , 01:36 AM

#1620

dkgojackets

DKGOAT

Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 86,120

still some rustling itt

pats got away with intentionally injuring a player for no penalty and then scored every drive with johnson out

11-19-2013 , 01:36 AM

#1621

Tom Ames

Thinks outside the bots

Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 49,581

Officiating the past two days has Ray Lewis so upset that his speech seems unintelligible and incoherent.

11-19-2013 , 01:37 AM

#1622

jay0582

old hand

Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 1,293

Quote:

Originally Posted by five4suited

on a tipped or intercepted ball, it is not the timing but the location of the player who tips or catches the ball. since the ball was caught 5-6 yards in front of Gronk

Except that's not the be all, end all of it. This was a very borderline situation, but there are plenty of times where a ball could be intercepted 5 yards in front of a player and DPI would easily be called because the Player could have otherwise made it back to the ball if not interfered with.

... And on a tipped pass it's a completely different scenario. Say a D lineman gets a fingertip on the ball at the line, pass interference can no longer be called. Completely different situation.

11-19-2013 , 01:38 AM

#1623

Jake7777

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 7,466

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Ames

Officiating the past two days has Ray Lewis so upset that his speech seems unintelligible and incoherent.

I think it's more the CTE

11-19-2013 , 01:38 AM

#1624

vhawk01

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 31,866

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goodie

Oh yeah sorry when people say "uncatchable" they really misspoke and meant uncouldhavegottenbackandmaybedonesomethingtodisrup tthatplayable.

11-19-2013 , 01:39 AM

#1625

LetsGambool

banned

Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 26,568

Quote:

Originally Posted by five4suited

on a tipped or intercepted ball, it is not the timing but the location of the player who tips or catches the ball. since the ball was caught 5-6 yards in front of Gronk, no call.

and ffs can I finally stop hearing about NE having SB equity? If this was the result facing Carolina, Peyton will destroy them.

eta: dudd posted this almost 2 pages ago. it's the rules.

Pats have much more SB equity than the Ravens had at this time last year or the Giants the year before that and maybe GB the year before that.

They will get destroyed next week if Talib and Dennard are out, Peyton will destroy everyone else in that secondary

Page 65 of 76

First

15 45 55 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 75

Last

Closed Thread Subscribe

...

Page 65 of 76

First

15 45 55 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 75

Last