Quote:
Originally Posted by dlorc
Who did Chuck even beat on his streak after winning the title? A bunch of bums.
UFC LHW was a joke during chucks reign.
Ortiz, Babalu and Randy are not jokes, not sure what you are talking about.
To answer Assani, both of Rampage's wins over Chuck are extremely good wins and I would say occurred in or around Chuck's prime.
To me, Chuck is over Wandy because of the quality of his early wins. You have to remember how much Tito ducked Chuck like crazy to accurately asses his 'title reign'. Tito won his championship at UFC 25 and first defended it at 29. At that point, Chuck was already 6-1 overall and 3-1 in the UFC, and they should have fought. Tito defended FIVE more times in the next two years without facing Chuck somehow. Chuck destroyed a who's who in MMA and fought better competition while Tito was champ than Tito did. While Tito was champ, from UFC 29-40, Chuck fought and beat Monson, Mezger, Randleman, Bustamante, Suloev, Belfort, Babalu and Overeem. He also lost to Randy for the first time.
I don't think people are getting how amazing that run was from UFC 29-40. Almost every guy on that list was in his prime or near it.
Wandy's run isn't quite as impressive to me because while there are numerous awesome wins, there are also a ton of cans. He went 3.5 years and 18 fights without losing right? Well two of those were draws, so let's focus on the 16 wins. Minowa, Yoshida, Kanehara, Iwasaki, Tamura, Otsuka, Oyama and Medina were all utter cans/garbage. So that's really 8 wins that we can look at. Mezger, Henderson, Saku the first two times were all good fights. 4 good ones. Saku the third time is not really a great win. Both wins over Rampage are good, and the Kondo win is pretty good.
So out of that awesome 3.5 year, 18 fight stretch, you emerge with 7 good wins, 2 draws, a win over a broken Sakuraba for a third time, and 8 destructions of massive cans. It's not quite the streak that people make it out to be, and I think Chuck's total body of work is more impressive than Wandy's.