Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Who Will Be The 2016 Republican Nominee? (It's Donald Trump) Who Will Be The 2016 Republican Nominee? (It's Donald Trump)

07-09-2015 , 02:07 PM
Jeb! obviously meant labor force participation and full time over part time (ties in nicely with anti Obama derp). Still, dude needs to be super careful and understand that he gets nothing from anything involving "work harder." Stick to the script, jobs wages and ponies for olds.
07-09-2015 , 02:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dth123451
Jeb! obviously meant labor force participation and full time over part time (ties in nicely with anti Obama derp). Still, dude needs to be super careful and understand that he gets nothing from anything involving "work harder." Stick to the script, jobs wages and ponies for olds.
Also no raising the gasoline tax and roads that magically pave themselves.
07-09-2015 , 02:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
I don't think it's worth 15 bucks for you to have my payment information. 50 bucks on your side is my min.
I'd go $50 on the Donald at 20-1 if you're interested. I don't expect to win but I'll spin the wheel on the stupidity of the typical GOP primary voter just for fun.

Have staked several people for live tournies on 2+2 and have always paid promptly. I use Chase QuickPay.
07-09-2015 , 02:21 PM
I'll caucus for Trump if you toss a few bucks my way :P
07-09-2015 , 02:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
oh goofy, you're never afraid to jump in and fail are you?
You're dodging half the thread right now who are correctly laughing at your Trump fail and your butthurt is showing when you angrily react to getting called out with "HU 4 ROLLZ?!?!?".

But sure, I'm failing. lol ikes
07-09-2015 , 02:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjoefish
They can currently choose to work 7 days so this law is not necessary, right inso?

They can, but not at one employer.

I'm sure you can see why that would be inconvenient for all involved.

We recently hired a carpenter to work four 10s for us M-Th, but he has another full time cabinet-making job that he works in three 12-hour shifts on F-Su. There are people who want to work 7 days a week.
07-09-2015 , 03:00 PM
It is quite a pain for businesses to have to offer their employees rest from work. I feel for the job creators.
07-09-2015 , 03:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
Yes, I do phill. You do not. If he has no chance of winning his message isn't resonating in any meaningful way.
No. You are wrong. In a few ways.
07-09-2015 , 03:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
They can, but not at one employer.

I'm sure you can see why that would be inconvenient for all involved.

We recently hired a carpenter to work four 10s for us M-Th, but he has another full time cabinet-making job that he works in three 12-hour shifts on F-Su. There are people who want to work 7 days a week.
So you're saying an employee can't currently choose to work 7 days a week at one employer if they want? That's your position here?
07-09-2015 , 03:11 PM
I'm not too worried about Wisconsin removing the 1-day off law. If Wisconsin somehow brings back sweatshops or hellish factory conditions, people will just vote back in labor protection laws like they did in the first place. And then dorm-room libertarians will understand why we even have those things. Circle of life, etc.
07-09-2015 , 03:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjoefish
So you're saying an employee can't currently choose to work 7 days a week at one employer if they want? That's your position here?
Well, the intent here seems to be to give employers a list of employees who have stated in writing that they're willing to be on call 7 days a week.

So with regard to choice and force, I think it's a little bit of column A, and a little of column B.

Currently, employers who want to force their employees to work 7 days a week can't. Now, they'll be able to force employees who have waived their "right" to a day off to come in, even if they didn't want to on that particular day.

That's my worst-case-scenario reading of the actual text.

Like suzzer says, I doubt this leads to sweatshops.
07-09-2015 , 03:32 PM
Well at least we've agreed that it's about employers being able to force people to work the 7th day and not blah blah blah employees can't choose FREEDOM!
07-09-2015 , 03:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by revots33
Also no raising the gasoline tax and roads that magically pave themselves.
Exactly. "I'm not in favor of increasing the tax burden on a middle class that has seen no wage growth under the Obummer economy." I look forward to working with congress on a comprehensive plan to strengthen our infrastructure for generations to come."

**** isn't hard
07-09-2015 , 03:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dth123451
Jeb! obviously meant labor force participation and full time over part time (ties in nicely with anti Obama derp). Still, dude needs to be super careful and understand that he gets nothing from anything involving "work harder." Stick to the script, jobs wages and ponies for olds.
We need to work longer hours, even if we don't want to. Jeb! 2016!
07-09-2015 , 03:51 PM
Trump finishing third is the more interesting bet.
07-09-2015 , 04:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
We need to work longer hours, even if we don't want to. Jeb! 2016!
So much for that vacation you were looking for.
07-09-2015 , 04:33 PM
.
07-09-2015 , 04:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AsianNit
Is Trump like a right-wing version of 2004 Howard Dean, substituting Mexican rapists for the Iraq war?
More like a bizarro world Nader (massive ego, terrible hair, never held office, convinced he can accomplish things that others can't because of WIM).

Dean was a respected governor who just got out in front of the anti war movement.
07-09-2015 , 05:00 PM
Dean has some similarities in that he was not disciplined, but that's a horribly unfair comparison to trump.
07-09-2015 , 05:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
They can, but not at one employer.

I'm sure you can see why that would be inconvenient for all involved.

We recently hired a carpenter to work four 10s for us M-Th, but he has another full time cabinet-making job that he works in three 12-hour shifts on F-Su. There are people who want to work 7 days a week.
You think he is working those 76 hours/week because he just can't get enough of wood working? If the man is guilty why haven't they arrested him.
07-09-2015 , 05:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
Dean has some similarities in that he was not disciplined, but that's a horribly unfair comparison to trump.
Hahahaha what?
07-09-2015 , 05:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPoppa
More like a bizarro world Nader (massive ego, terrible hair, never held office, convinced he can accomplish things that others can't because of WIM).

Dean was a respected governor who just got out in front of the anti war movement.
Nader was third party. Dean/Trump were/are running for a major party nomination. I supported Dean and would still love him if he jumped into the 2012 race. My comparison is purely structural. A guy who was considered to be on the fringe captures populist lightning in a bottle with what he might not have intended to be his most important issue. Will Trump have a similar initial excitement, but ultimately go as far as Dean did?
07-09-2015 , 05:49 PM
Poor mayo
07-09-2015 , 05:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Rata
Still waiting for Ikes to confirm our wager lol. Maybe these polls are getting him nervous about risking 1 grand on the highly rational/intelligent GOP primary voters?

      
m