Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Israel Palestine Israel Palestine

05-13-2013 , 12:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeedz
it's useless and targets individuals and groups that have no say in whatever policy you might be protesting.
International isolation was a big part of why Afrikaaners gave up apartheid. But it's a long process to get a group to reach that frame of mind. And there's not much of an alternative.

Last edited by Bill Haywood; 05-13-2013 at 01:10 PM.
05-13-2013 , 01:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Haywood
International isolation was a big part of why Afrikaaners gave up apartheid. But it's a long process to get a group to reach that frame of mind. And there's not much of an alternative.
I think that public opinion can be won around quite quickly. It's important to emphasise that what Israel is doing in the OPT is apartheid as people understand what that is and agree that apartheid is unacceptable.
05-13-2013 , 06:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeedz
One could argue that academic institutions are a facet of government, in many countries they are either directly or indirectly funded by the government and in some places they are mouthpieces for government agenda.

Anyway, I must admit I did find this odd. Despite my qualms with the Israeli government and military/security services (not the people), I've never had much love for the boycott movement, mainly because it's useless and targets individuals and groups that have no say in whatever policy you might be protesting.
Aren't the government policies you're protesting wildly popular in Israel tho?
05-13-2013 , 07:00 PM
So?

Also, I've come to learn that people will support all sorts of stupid **** on a poll or an election but when it actually comes down to it or when they see the effects for themselves then they quickly change their minds. The only way to stay sane and for it to make sense is to automatically assume that despite how they may act or what they say, most people are mostly good at their core regardless of where they live or what they call themselves.
05-14-2013 , 02:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeedz
So?

Also, I've come to learn that people will support all sorts of stupid **** on a poll or an election but when it actually comes down to it or when they see the effects for themselves then they quickly change their minds. The only way to stay sane and for it to make sense is to automatically assume that despite how they may act or what they say, most people are mostly good at their core regardless of where they live or what they call themselves.

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke)
05-14-2013 , 04:26 AM
I hardly think that's applicable here, otherwise you have a very wide definition of 'evil'.
05-14-2013 , 05:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeedz
I hardly think that's applicable here, otherwise you have a very wide definition of 'evil'.

Driving people off their land and killing them if they resist whilst operating a system of apartheid against them and occasionally attacking them and killing them by the hundred or thousand to break their resistance is evil within my definition of the word "evil". Don't you agree ?
05-14-2013 , 06:26 AM
@ADT

I am not interested in your rant I will just point out that everything I wrote is currently happening and imo it is evil within any reasonable definition of the word "evil".
05-14-2013 , 06:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnnieDuke'sTattoo
What is currently happening is that Arab refugees from Israel are still living in conditions in Arab states worse than Arab residents of the West Bank and Gaza.
The Palestinians in the OPT are not proper refugees as they've always lived there. They have just been colonised and decitizenised and the colonisers have instituted a system of apartheid against them like the South African whites did in apartheid South Africa.
05-14-2013 , 09:35 AM
"instituted a system of apartheid against them like the South African whites did in apartheid South Africa."

Israeli Apartheid Week was held in 215 cities this year.

NB that's a protest AGAINST it.
05-15-2013 , 04:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnnieDuke'sTattoo
....Especially considering how many examples you've been given in the past on these boards.....
How do you know you only registered yesterday. Is that you Confluence84 ?
05-16-2013 , 11:00 AM
A recent episode of This American Life talked with Israeli soldiers about one of the frustrations of serving in the occupied territories. They have to go into Palestinian homes at all hours and photograph and identify all the residents. Then the data they collect over months is destroyed.
05-17-2013 , 01:20 PM
And the most illuminating article:

From Israeli news aggregator Walla!, an article by Lital Shemesh, a young, liberal Israeli journalist, considered a rising star in the Israeli media who openly expresses her political aspirations.

And translated into English on an Israeli blog.

Quote:
I participated in the Dialogue for Peace Project for young Israelis and Palestinians who are politically involved in various frameworks. The project’s objective was to identify tomorrow’s leaders and bring them closer today, with the aim of bringing peace at some future time.

The Israeli side, which included representatives from right and left, tried to understand the Palestinians’ vision of the end of the strife– “Let’s talk business.” The Israelis delved to understand how we can end the age-old, painful conflict. What red lines are they willing to be flexible on? What resolution will satisfy their aspirations? Where do they envision the future borders of the Palestinian State which they so crave?

We were shocked to discover that not a single one of them spoke of a Palestinian State, or to be more precise, of a two-state solution.

They spoke of one state – their state. They spoke of ruling Jaffa, Tel Aviv, Akko, Haifa, and the pain of the Nakba [lit. the tragedy – the establishment of the State of Israel]. There was no future for them. Only the past. “There is no legitimacy for Jews to live next to us” – this was their main message. “First, let them pay for what they perpetrated.”

Israelis from the full gamut of political parties participated in the seminar: Likud, Labor, Kadima, Meretz, and Hadash (combined Jewish/Arab socialist party). All of them reached the understanding that the beautiful scenarios of Israeli-Palestinian peace that they had formulated for themselves simply don’t correspond with reality. It’s just that most Israelis don’t have the opportunity to sit and really converse with Palestinians, to hear what they really think.

I arrived at the seminar with high hopes, and I return home with difficult feelings and despair. Something about the narrative of the two sides is different from the core. How can we return to the negotiating table when the Israeli side speaks of two states and the Palestinian side speaks of liberating Palestine from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea?
This is not the first time a group of Israelis who pine for peace have met with their liberal Arab counterparts - only to find that they have no counterparts at all.
05-17-2013 , 01:28 PM
Question for anyone: Does anyone think the two-State solution will work? If not, how will Isreal cope with the demographical shift that is currently happening? If one person, one vote is a underlying prinicipal of democracy won't Isreal cease to be as it as currently constructed.?
05-17-2013 , 01:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kimoser22
Question for anyone: Does anyone think the two-State solution will work? If not, how will Isreal cope with the demographical shift that is currently happening? If one person, one vote is a underlying prinicipal of democracy won't Isreal cease to be as it as currently constructed.?
There simply won't be peace until there is a dramatic cultural shift in Arab attitudes towards Israel. Two-state solution, one-state solution, nothing will change. Israel isn't going anywhere, the Arabs aren't going anywhere. So we'll just sit and wait. The waiting game has proven better for us than them, and I feel terrible for the honest people that just want to make a living and be comfortable, who are subject to despotic propagandized rule by their leaders and security operations by ours.

EDIT all of which is to say, that eventually there will be two states, with minority populations of each nation (jews and arabs) in the "others'" state, as free citizens. hopefully. but stuffing solutions down the throats of each side is a waste of time and won't end violence - in fact I bet it will increase it.

Last edited by Gamblor; 05-17-2013 at 01:45 PM.
05-17-2013 , 01:34 PM
Are you actually Israeli?

Interesting.
05-17-2013 , 01:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeedz
Are you actually Israeli?

Interesting.
There are a few that occasionally post here.

I've split my life between Israel and Canada (which is probably why I still have the stomach to talk about it)
Hadis is a lefty peacenik dreamer (kidding he's a smart guy)
Goater is an immigrant to Israel from a long time ago but still occassionally posts
05-17-2013 , 01:49 PM
Ah fair enough, I just assumed you were American because most of the staunch defenders usually are either conservative or christian americans (no offence of course). Yeah, I get what you mean, it's not easy dealing with stuff from the homeland if you have a troubled one, it's not the same but I can hardly deal with discussing Syria now because it's so grim, I'm just lucky I don't live there anymore.

Anyway, thank you for the info, also, in regards to your link about liberal Israelis not finding their counterparts, two problems with this 1) It's much easier for an Israeli to be a liberal than for a Palestinian, while Israel has a security threat, most of the Palestinian territories area is a wasteland and life is much more difficult for them than for the Israeli people. 2) There are liberal Palestinians and other Muslims/Middle Easterners (I don't like the word Arab), but, as you said, in most Middle Eastern cultures there is a lot of hate against Jews and Israelis in particular, Israel on the other hand is somewhat western in it's outlook, so, by definition, it's more likely to find a liberal Israeli than a liberal Palestinian. Obviously though there is plenty of stupidity and hate on all sides.
05-17-2013 , 01:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamblor
And the most illuminating article:

From Israeli news aggregator Walla!, an article by Lital Shemesh, a young, liberal Israeli journalist, considered a rising star in the Israeli media who openly expresses her political aspirations.

And translated into English on an Israeli blog.



This is not the first time a group of Israelis who pine for peace have met with their liberal Arab counterparts - only to find that they have no counterparts at all.
Asymmetry, how does it work?
05-17-2013 , 01:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kimoser22
Question for anyone: Does anyone think the two-State solution will work? If not, how will Isreal cope with the demographical shift that is currently happening? If one person, one vote is a underlying prinicipal of democracy won't Isreal cease to be as it as currently constructed.?
Israel has opted for the apartheid solution with the Palestinians in the OPT never getting freedom or citizenship and a vote.
05-17-2013 , 02:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hadis
Asymmetry, how does it work?
You're thinking of Fundamental Attribution Error.

I'm not saying that Arabs just hate because they hate, that is obviously ******ed.

But it sounds like you're saying that if I tell myself that everything you have should belong to me, I get to stop thinking logically. I have no obligation to work toward an agreement. I don't have to recognize your rights too.
05-17-2013 , 02:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeedz
Ah fair enough, I just assumed you were American because most of the staunch defenders usually are either conservative or christian americans (no offence of course). Yeah, I get what you mean, it's not easy dealing with stuff from the homeland if you have a troubled one, it's not the same but I can hardly deal with discussing Syria now because it's so grim, I'm just lucky I don't live there anymore.
wouldn't wish that on anyone.

Quote:
Anyway, thank you for the info, also, in regards to your link about liberal Israelis not finding their counterparts, two problems with this 1) It's much easier for an Israeli to be a liberal than for a Palestinian, while Israel has a security threat, most of the Palestinian territories area is a wasteland and life is much more difficult for them than for the Israeli people.
you're half right. it is much more difficult for them, this is true. is it really a wasteland? Take a drive one day near abu dis, or in the hills north and east of jerusalem. There are Palestinian mansions bigger than Buckingham palace. And if you want to know why Palestinians suffer, those houses are all owned by people in government (or close connections).

Quote:
2) There are liberal Palestinians and other Muslims/Middle Easterners (I don't like the word Arab), but, as you said, in most Middle Eastern cultures there is a lot of hate against Jews and Israelis in particular, Israel on the other hand is somewhat western in it's outlook, so, by definition, it's more likely to find a liberal Israeli than a liberal Palestinian. Obviously though there is plenty of stupidity and hate on all sides.
true. you should hear some (SOME) of the black hats talk. But those people are hated and condemned by significant majorities of Israel, including (and most importantly) mainstream media. Mainstream media among middle easterners (if that's the term you prefer i am happy to use it, though we are middle easterners too) is a source of much of the hate. That's a fundamental difference.
05-17-2013 , 02:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamblor
You're thinking of Fundamental Attribution Error.

I'm not saying that Arabs just hate because they hate, that is obviously ******ed.

But it sounds like you're saying that if I tell myself that everything you have should belong to me, I get to stop thinking logically. I have no obligation to work toward an agreement. I don't have to recognize your rights too.
No, that i'm saying is since the situation is not symmetrical,it is illogical to assume that both parties would feel symmetrical about the situation.

      
m