Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! "Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode!

11-18-2018 , 11:46 AM
But would they ever use it if Bob weren't there? "The police talked to myself" sounds completely stupid, right? Then don't use it when you add Bob to the sentence.

As for whom, I agree that it is somewhat archaic, but if people are going to use it at all, they should use it correctly. Otherwise, just let it die like almost all other case-based words in English.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
11-18-2018 , 11:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by daveT
My point was that "whom" was never once discussed in the 12 years I went to grade school or high school, and I'd guess many people have had the same experience.
I'm sorry to hear about your incompetent educational experience, but you're projecting here.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
11-18-2018 , 12:07 PM
Garick, of course they would say it if they were talking only about themselves.

Didace, I may well be projecting. I did go to a bottom 10 school district, and that would be a topic for another thread.

I do talk to people now and then and even read words now and then. I seldom see the word "whom" used. If it was a natural part of common speech, it would be used as such, not incorrectly well into adulthood. A "proper" education would hopefully ensure that people don't get this one wrong.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
11-18-2018 , 06:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by daveT
Garick, of course they would say it if they were talking only about themselves.
Ew.

I mean it's just one of those random "button-mashing of grammar" kind of things, it sounds vaguely sophisticated to use "myself" so people happened to pick up the idea of using it everywhere. In an alternate universe it could very well be "whom" that people decided to pepper throughout their speech incorrectly because it sounds smurt.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
11-18-2018 , 10:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garick
But would they ever use it if Bob weren't there? "The police talked to myself" sounds completely stupid, right? Then don't use it when you add Bob to the sentence.
It's a strange Britishism. According to this 2016 NYTimes piece ("England’s Reflexive Pronoun Epidemic"), it's on the rise: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/29/o...-yourself.html
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
11-23-2018 , 01:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by daveT
This whole "whom" vs "who" thing is making my head explode. Never once, in my education growing up, have we ever used "whom." I woudno't be surprised if many others have had the same experience.

I think that "whom" is becoming a bit of an archaic term, slowly moving out of common use. ...
Here's a dissenting view:
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cu...it-may-concern
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
11-23-2018 , 11:43 PM
I feel like using The New Yorker as an example of proper style and grammar for any year past 1862 is a bit of a reach.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
11-25-2018 , 09:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by daveT
I feel like using The New Yorker as an example of proper style and grammar for any year past 1862 is a bit of a reach.
We all have our blind spots.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
11-26-2018 , 07:29 AM
Some people agree me and some people disagree with me:

http://www.latimes.com/socal/burbank...725-story.html
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
11-27-2018 , 01:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by daveT
Some people agree me and some people disagree with me:

http://www.latimes.com/socal/burbank...725-story.html
That's a much better response that your original breezy dismissal of my post. Casagrande makes valid observations, certainly (though she's being nit-picking about the spelling choices).

As well, I've read Mary Norris's first Comma Queen book and don't agree with her on several points, so -- even though I am in accord with her about maintaining the who/whom distinction (in writing) -- I did have some mild reservations about citing her.

However, while it may have some finicky and eccentric punctuation, The New Yorker remains too much an exemplary source of well-written and well-edited prose to dismiss out of hand.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
11-28-2018 , 06:22 AM
I'm certainly not dismissing the writing quality of the The New Yorker articles. I'm only saying that it's grammar and punctuation is a little eccentric and a bit old-timey.

My argument is that "whom" is falling out of modern use. The New Yorker isn't the guiding light to modern language.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
11-28-2018 , 06:02 PM
My daughter, who has been an avid reader since childhood and takes great pains with language (mostly), works for a major American corporation. She frequently sends me frightening examples of corporate speak. Today's included "I will caveat that with Dave" and "The only thing I would supplement is that in every instance they need to work with myself."
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
11-28-2018 , 10:46 PM
wat? I mean, the second one is obviously just a "myself" where a "me" should go and some unnecessary fluff, but IHNFI what the first one is even trying to say. Check with Dave? Dave might be an exception?? Warn Dave???
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
11-28-2018 , 10:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garick
wat?
My response was "WTF?"
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
11-29-2018 , 12:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Cole
"The only thing I would supplement is that in every instance they need to work with myself."
I don't think I've seen "supplement" used quite that way before. Seems like some words are missing.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
11-29-2018 , 12:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Didace
I don't think I've seen "supplement" used quite that way before. Seems like some words are missing.
Hence "corporate" speech. Instead of saying, "the only thing I would add," say "supplement" instead.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
11-29-2018 , 03:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garick
wat? I mean, the second one is obviously just a "myself" where a "me" should go and some unnecessary fluff, but IHNFI what the first one is even trying to say. Check with Dave? Dave might be an exception?? Warn Dave???
I figured it meant "warn Dave". Still silly though.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
11-29-2018 , 03:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chillrob
I figured it meant "warn Dave". Still silly though.
That's all I could figure.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
11-30-2018 , 01:06 AM
I think that he's confused. Ye is the object form of you, not a plural. Thou/thee, you/ye.

AFAIK, you/ye was the plural/formal second person pronoun in those days, and thou/thee was the informal.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
11-30-2018 , 01:07 AM
What about Come All Ye Faithful? That's plural, not an object, right?
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
11-30-2018 , 01:17 AM
It's a prepositional phrase, missing its preposition to make it fit in the song, imo. Should be "all of ye." Of course, that doesn't work with the "come ye, oh come ye" portion, but I suspect that's poetic license.

Also, pretty sure it wasn't actually written in Middle English. Heaven knows I've seen churches get cases completely wrong when they use thou/thee/thy.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
11-30-2018 , 08:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garick
I think that he's confused. Ye is the object form of you, not a plural. Thou/thee, you/ye.

AFAIK, you/ye was the plural/formal second person pronoun in those days, and thou/thee was the informal.
From m-w.com:

Quote:
ye pronoun

\ˈyē


\
Definition of ye (Entry 1 of 2)
: you sense 1 —used originally only as a plural pronoun of the second person in the subjective case and now used especially in ecclesiastical or literary language and in various English dialects
Are y'all you guys yuze you ye with me?
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
11-30-2018 , 09:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Cole
My daughter, who has been an avid reader since childhood and takes great pains with language (mostly), works for a major American corporation. She frequently sends me frightening examples of corporate speak. Today's included "I will caveat that with Dave" and "The only thing I would supplement is that in every instance they need to work with myself."
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
11-30-2018 , 09:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by meshanti
From m-w.com:



Are y'all you guys yuze you ye with me?
I sit corrected.

I'm surprised by that, as the pattern of "e" endings in objective case is pretty common: I/me, thou/thee. When I think about it, though, she, he, and we are all subjective, so why not ye?
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote

      
m