Most obvious trade of the year. The only question is if missing it is worth an epic hot tub session

Nice call JV, too bad this one wasn't included in this bet (for Brian)... Likely called the ST bottom.

I doubt this was the case. He has a waterproof bloomberg terminal installed in his jacuzzi. He kills the markets wherever, whenever. When he was six he had a quotron attached to his schwinn with a direct line to the cboe pits. Also, had a baby pool with jets installed.

No you wouldn't. You're an expert bull****ter which means that you'd pick a number that was impressive but not high enough to be unbelievable. $27K is a perfect number.


Right because not being able to find an image on the internet absolutely proves you didnt fabricate it since the only way to possibly fabricate an image is to use someone else's image....that is available on the internet for everyone to double check.



Tops the post of with a buzzy ad hom like usual. I used to think you were a smart bull****ter but the more you post the more I can see this is some simple but very limited strategy you employ in literally every post.

1. Overstate the case
2. Dare people to do obvious checks to establish credibility
3. Ad hom conclusion

Every. Single. Post.

Record yourself logging into your trading account, you pathetic, lying little coward.

In before "I closed that trade for a 5 bagger"

So you're 99% certain I'm lying but you won't take 3:1 in your favor. That's 30,000% in EV you're turning down. What a clown.

The reason I won't give 10:1 is because, as explained, that doesn't even cover the spread. 3:1 in you favor covers the spread and leaves me a little bit of money besides.

Dude, you're obviously obsessed. The fact that you're going off on some unhinged conspiracy theory where I don't even trade is comical. The fact that you think you're heroically taking down a bully rather than going off on an obsessed conspiracy is an absolute howler. How much of a weedy loser are you? Amazing stuff.

The funniest part of all this is that my counterparty, Brian, as well as much of this forum which is in private chat, has actually seen pictures from my penthouse apartment with my trading windows open which I've posted in private chat. They're laughing their asses off at what an unhinged loser you are...you've quite frankly lost your mind.

For real dude, not even being a prick here, there is something legitimately wrong with your brain. You repeatedly show a low-level inability to follow a conversation.

Here is what happened:
Me pointing out how idiotic his aspersions are has nothing to do with with me claiming that not being able to reverse image search this image means it's not doctored. I've repeatedly said I could fake almost anything including a video of same using scripts like GreaseMonkey.

Congratulations, you're one of the dumbest people on this forum.

Might want to recheck my reasoning for not taking that bet.

Then post the pics dawg. Also, unlike you I don't really care if random people on the internet think I'm stupid. In fact, I don't care if people irl think i'm dumb. Most of the best things that happened in my life were the result of doing things other people thought were weird. Your a fake. It is not hard to see.

Still waiting on those jacuzzi pics big balla...

P.S. Jacuzzi pics would need to have "lol turtle tom" handwritten in them before I even considered giving them any credibility.

It's amazing to see a grown man, I'm assuming grown, get so flustered he uses the "your a dumb dumb" defense multiple times.

Must not have learned that ad homs are terrible arguments when getting that phd in nuclear astro evolutionary bio mechanical physics.

It's not a defense, it's a factual statement. I post more evidence and reasoning than anyone on BFI.

Ironically it's you doing all ad hominem here. You can't refute my arguments anywhere (you've gotten your ass kicked on every conversation we've had), so all you have left is to ad hominem to death. Which also fails because you're wrong on the facts. The same thing happened to Henry17 when he owned losers, he had 10+ people following him around desperately trying to score a point. It's highly entertaining to watch idiots lose their minds and get obsessed and post increasingly desperate and stupid ad hominem arguments like this (that merely show their own hilarious ignorance):

because they got owned in earlier arguments and their ego can't take it.

I dunno what else to say man. Go study? I'd hate for you to do worse on your finals than you already are because you're wasting your study time rage posting with dreams of "taking down" the bully.

What do you study for in school turtletom? Taking the bet might be a good idea, because student loans can get pretty expensive and extra money can't hurt if you are indeed 99% certain.

I'm freerolling school and my wife is working so COL for me is zero. Plus I still have plenty of capital left over from my days trading full time. If anything trading professionally teaches you to live small.

Not trying to sound like an asshat but a 1k bet doesn't motivate me to jump through the hoops that bet would require. Also, there is enough circumstantial evidence in this thread to prove he is fos. I don't really need the validation of winning the bet. I'm not wasting time and emotional capital.

Not sure you know what an ad hom is...

Evidence, evidence, evidence. You have none. That's not an ad hom. That's attacking directly your claim of greatest trader ever or I'm in a jacuzzi penthouse. Quit calling me dumb and put up or shut up.

Also, the 10-15 minutes I spend posting and lol'ing is not going to hurt my studies. Appreciate your concern though.

It's attacking the person not the argument. Since I am not a topic relevant to BFI, you spending 48 posts in this thread incompetently attacking me is an ad hominem. If you have a problem with my advice to say, CandyKreep, attack that advice. You were too stupid and incompetent and got owned every time you tried, so now you're trying to ad hominem in 49 zero content posts in this thread.
I've never claimed this and it would be a ridiculous claim given that I'm not worth >$200 million from trading. I wrote this to you in a PM after you cold-PMed me saying you'd posted my posts at another forum to get their opinion (obviously obsessed with me) to wind you up. You're so stupid and obsessed you thought I was serious, with hilarious results as your truther-fevered mind goes nuts thinking it's 99% I don't even trade real money despite any rational take putting that at <1%.
I offered you an escrowed bet for proof at 300x expectation according to your own numbers (99% sure). You claimed you needed to "study". lol?
You're a grown man mature age student living off your wife? I thought maybe you were some dumb hyperactive college kid which is maybe excusable. Jesus this is comical and pathetic.

No wonder you're a Tooth truther. Henry17 used to attract all the drooling ******s/life losers as well sure he was a fake and obsessed with taking him down. It was equally comical.

WTF? Is this you admitting you're afraid of getting owned for real money? What happened to "99% sure"?

If you are so confident in your claims, then you would be happy to take a 1:1 bet. But when he offered even more generous terms than that (3:1), you backpedaled like you had just grabbed a hooker's dick by accident.

You both are acting like children here, but we expect that from TS. What's your excuse?

Tooth obviously not afraid of burning emotional capital. Very wrapped up in his internet persona.

As far as not taking the bet you can read why I'm not taking it. Mostly has to do with the fact I have zero faith in Tooth's legitimacy. Rationale here is not ground breaking stuff.

Also, lol'd hard at tooth saying I'm an idiot, or something, because my wife is an income source while in school.

That is one perspective, I guess.

Can we just ban them both?

Ok now I just feel sad. I'm not longer gonna mock you. Good luck to you bro and gl bettering yourself by getting an education. And yes, a decent percentage of the population would view living off your income-producing wife as a win. So congratulations on that*.

I'll stop mocking you for not taking the bet as well.

I'll post trades before it's all over. Still waiting for a big one to do this in one shot but a couple of weeks of trades should get me there. Hopefully it'll give you some insight into how your mind is susceptible to low-information trutherism, which is really just your internal Bayes gone haywire. Maybe it'll be a learning experience for you.

*That was mocking you but I promise you that's the last time.

no bans please

Turtle has no living expenses but won't take a bet for a free money? Also, is dawg still part of the vernacular?

Well could you imagine him trying to explain to his wife the bet and why it's good for him?

If only there were some sort of wager you could make regarding Tooth's legitimacy. Even better would be if there were judges and an escrow to remove party risk and your thesis only needed to be correct 25% of the time.

Yes, we can all read why you're not taking the bet. Mostly has to do with the fact that you realized that you would lose. You were smart to backpedal. Just own it.