Quote:
Originally Posted by eddymitchel
it s hard to compare fiat and crypto.
proof of work bring some upside to the cost and tend to get optimized alot overtime as it s the bottomline for miners.
I m fairly sure fiat could optimize alot aswell and crypto will push adjustment in fiat aswell, for exemple coins and bills are super inneficient and dropping them would lower fiat costs a ton.
It's pretty obvious that in the long run, should Bitcoin become a dominant currency or asset underlying currencies, then the electricity burning of the proof of work would be far greater than the costs associated with centralized currencies. Some of it could be mitigated by using the heat, but most of it would still be lost in energy transformation.
The costs will be spread out over every transaction, in a market based manner, and what you're paying for is uncensorability and protection against inflation. The demand for this will probably vary greatly over time, based on the trust in centralized currencies and government, and the penalties and tax implications of using it. But even if there was at some point a total market domination, there would eventually emerge an alternative that was almost identical, but centralized and therefor with lower costs. And the tides would turn.
This is a hypothetical. Bitcoin might never become a widely used currency or basis for one, but then it doesn't make sense to compare its costs to FIAT systems' anyway.