Quote:
Originally Posted by kahntrutahn
You misunderstand.
More rewards = tougher games. That is how poker economies work.
--
Kahn
I'm still not sure what you think I don't understand.
I misunderstood your connecting statement because you said my statement that Intertops had both nice rewards AND poor traffic followed from Intertops having a lot of regs. It was unclear whether you were saying "more regs => nice rewards" or "more regs => low traffic" or both. Since you clarified by saying you meant "better rewards = tougher games" I agree with your assessment and already understood the connection. Your original post, by quoting my two statements and saying, "many people fail to see the connection between this and the statement below," seemed to imply that I am among those who fail to see the connection which I objected to.
As I stated in the last post, I understand completely why regs gravitate to sites with rewards - they are primarily interested in building a bankroll. Recreational players generally just want to have some fun gambling, win a few big pots and maybe make a big score. They may not be aware of how much they are paying in rake nor even that there is such a thing as rakeback.
Rec players go to sites where they won't get beat up (Merge, for instance, who limits winning players and pays no rakeback to attract regs) or they are protected (Bovada for instance, no HUDS that collect multisession databases, anonymous tables, and no rakeback). Regs go to sites where they can maximize their poker income (WPN and Revolution who offer good rakeback).
To circle back to my original point, it's a shame that Intertops has such poor traffic because they have nice rewards. I would play there even with the US regs and bad-aggressive Euros that are there now if there were a lot of games running.