Open Side Menu Go to the Top

02-28-2013 , 09:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlotsDonk
for Palladium Elite and Palladium VIPs I believe. 10 and 15% bonus of your monthly points each month.
I am a Palladium Elite and never got this bonus this month, can you give a link where this is said or something?

Thank you!
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread Quote
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread
$25m Guaranteed WPM on CoinPoker
Join the action now
Daily Rewards • Splash Pots • CoinRaces
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread
02-28-2013 , 09:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lessu
BlackHole,

Can you do one at 8.30 server time (in about 10mins) showing the whole table list on TST

like this

thanks

http://i.imgur.com/MaY08Mf.jpg
Like this:

[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread Quote
02-28-2013 , 09:36 AM
thanks. here is mine at 8.30

http://i.imgur.com/eJIdCdl.jpg
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread Quote
02-28-2013 , 09:39 AM
yours pics aren't showing speed tables. i'll see if there are any normal ones missing
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread Quote
02-28-2013 , 09:55 AM
ok based on a quick browse through those pics the tables are exactly the same on mine and your first pic but your 2nd pic is showing few tables more

I just ignored all my speed tables as you didn't include them

your 0 points pic is showing Balakovo, Dat?a, H?ncesti, Isfahan, Norisk and Tunbridge Wells that neither your acc with points or I can see

Guess I have to change my mind and join the something-fishy-is-going-on-club
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread Quote
02-28-2013 , 09:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lessu
ok based on a quick browse through those pics the tables are exactly the same on mine and your first pic but your 2nd pic is showing few tables more

I just ignored all my speed tables as you didn't include them

your 0 points pic is showing Balakovo, Dat?a, H?ncesti, Isfahan, Norisk and Tunbridge Wells that neither your acc with points or I can see

Guess I have to change my mind and join the something-fishy-is-going-on-club
Welcome on club
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread Quote
02-28-2013 , 10:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lessu
you guys are jumping into ******ed conclusions.
I didn't make any conclusion! I'll Post it again, maybe you can read it with more attention. If you still think i made a ******ed conclusion please tell me where maybe i can explain.

[QUOTE=sapo23]


1st EVIDENCE: Lots of players have the feeling that the number of players/fishes/tables had changed after last software update.

2nd EVIDENCE: We are not sure why this is appening.

3rd EVIDENCE: There isn't an official answer from Party poker.

So this is what we want to know:

Quote:
Originally Posted by pasita
Party_Rep, does Party (or some other skin on the same network) somehow restrict the player pool visibility to some players, either based on the skin they play at, their play amount, their observed winrate or some other factor? Do you rank (as implied by the UAP) the players based on those or other factors?
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread Quote
02-28-2013 , 10:19 AM
.

Last edited by at1f1u; 02-28-2013 at 10:28 AM.
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread Quote
02-28-2013 , 10:31 AM
I know that everyone here on 2+2 is a winning reg but maybe some of you know some solid fish and could check how it differs between winning account and losing account that both were used recently. Then we would have some solid proof that something shaddy is going on.
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread Quote
02-28-2013 , 10:38 AM
I want a statement from party_rep regarding all of this.

Bug, intentional segregation, nothing is out of the ordinary, or something else ....

There has to be some merit to all of this chatter here on 2+2, and elsewhere ...



Response from party_rep please !!
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread Quote
02-28-2013 , 10:52 AM
I spoke to VIP Rep Tina via live chat last night, around 6pm EST, about this. She said to expect an official answer within 24 hours.
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread Quote
02-28-2013 , 11:14 AM
24 hours to respond to us about this, that surely must mean this is a bug and they don't have all the answers yet surely?
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread Quote
02-28-2013 , 11:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gotdanuts
Response from party_rep please !!
This! This! This!

One thing that has got me wondering though, is if this is an intentional attempt to segregate players; why are the people on the "fishy" accounts able to see all the tables? Surely if they wanted to segregate fish, they would make it so the fish saw different tables to regs and there wouldn't be an overlap like this?

Juk

EDIT: LOL, way to waste your 10000th post!

Last edited by jukofyork; 02-28-2013 at 11:31 AM.
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread Quote
02-28-2013 , 11:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlotsDonk
for Palladium Elite and Palladium VIPs I believe. 10 and 15% bonus of your monthly points each month.
I'm a VIP. I just checked my past statements. I've never gotten 10% bonus points each month.

Their VIP page doesn't list that bonus either:
http://www.partypoker.com/vip-rewards/vip.html
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread Quote
02-28-2013 , 11:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CasperW
I'm a VIP. I just checked my past statements. I've never gotten 10% bonus points each month.

Their VIP page doesn't list that bonus either:
http://www.partypoker.com/vip-rewards/vip.html
I think it's for casino players only (see above).

Juk
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread Quote
02-28-2013 , 11:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jukofyork
This! This! This!

One thing that has got me wondering though, is if this is an intentional attempt to segregate players; why are the people on the "fishy" accounts able to see all the tables? Surely if they wanted to segregate fish, they would make it so the fish saw different tables to regs and there wouldn't be an overlap like this?

Juk
Not really. Most of the fish use the quick seat feature so if you hide from regs the quick seat tables that they seat the fish based on their rating that would explain it all.

BTW juk congratz on your 10k post

Last edited by gargamel_fk; 02-28-2013 at 11:51 AM.
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread Quote
02-28-2013 , 01:09 PM
Tina said that neither she nor any other reps had heard anything. It would be presented to the poker team in the morning (5 hours from when I spoke to her) and they would answer ASAP.
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread Quote
02-28-2013 , 02:39 PM
I made a test today:

I run TST on PP lobby before login and after login. Same n.º of tables, same n.º of players, same fish.

So can we assume that there is no segregation, right?
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread Quote
02-28-2013 , 02:52 PM
I can`t withdraw for over a week now, obviously sent all the needed documents and 3 Emails didn`t get an answer. I play ~6 Sites moving money around is essential for me -.-

Pretty much the worst support ive seen.
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread Quote
02-28-2013 , 03:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NiSash1337
I can`t withdraw for over a week now, obviously sent all the needed documents and 3 Emails didn`t get an answer. I play ~6 Sites moving money around is essential for me -.-

Pretty much the worst support ive seen.
At PP they processed and confirmed all my last withdraws in less than 12h...
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread Quote
02-28-2013 , 03:09 PM
They asked me for my documents so obviously that usually takes a bit longer but 7 days is just ridiculous.
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread Quote
02-28-2013 , 03:34 PM
ya, juk makes a good point. If they segregated it surely they wouldn't let this fish see all our tables, yet us not see theres. The logic there is flawed.. Pretty much what that is doing is simple taking a barrel, stocking it with fish and letting a few breakeven, or running bad regs into that barrel. Makes no sense at all really, I am pretty confident this is a bug, and if it is not a bug I am also done with party. There will be no turning back at this point, this is not poker if it is true.
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread Quote
02-28-2013 , 03:51 PM
Second video - dowód ostateczny

Now i recorded on FullHD screen so everything looks perfect. Watch on bigscreen in FullHd quality.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhYBm3yaIUA
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread Quote
02-28-2013 , 03:56 PM
Fish might be able to see just a few of the winning players tables. They could do this so easily just by setting winning players can see xyz tables and losing players can see vxy or whatever.
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread Quote
02-28-2013 , 03:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jukofyork
One thing that has got me wondering though, is if this is an intentional attempt to segregate players; why are the people on the "fishy" accounts able to see all the tables? Surely if they wanted to segregate fish, they would make it so the fish saw different tables to regs and there wouldn't be an overlap like this?
The fish wouldn't be happy if the saw the result: "hey, where did 90% of the tables just go... I guess another site would be better to play at"?
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread Quote
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread
$25m Guaranteed WPM on CoinPoker
Join the action now
Daily Rewards • Splash Pots • CoinRaces
[PartyPoker] Ex-Official thread

      
m