Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Internet Poker's Top 10 Winners & Losers By Game Type "All Time" (since HSDB tracking) Internet Poker's Top 10 Winners & Losers By Game Type "All Time" (since HSDB tracking)

12-24-2011 , 06:40 AM
since I'm a huge Ziig nuthugger I wanna bump this and add that if I were to redo the original post, he has now broken into the top 10 for PLO with 2.5 million earned on his "Ilari FIN" account on Pokerstars.
Internet Poker's Top 10 Winners & Losers By Game Type "All Time" (since HSDB tracking) Quote
12-24-2011 , 02:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RangeyMcTriplmerge
If anything was rigged in Ivey's favour on FTP, he didn't know about it. I can say this with relative confidence because I'm certain that he played under the 'raiseonce' account on stars - and every crazy, potentially suspicious outlier stat in Ivey's FTP play (and there are several of these) is matched by raiseonce's stats on stars. See my post in the raiseonce thread for details.

In other words, Ivey played exactly the same way on stars as he did on FTP, suggesting that his unusual tendencies on FTP were not reflective of any cheating within Ivey's consciousness. I presume nobody would claim that he had a special deal with stars to rig things for him

The only real difference between these two accounts of course is that on FTP he won mirrions whereas on stars he was break even. So either:

a) he just ran well on FTP
b) he got outplayed by the solid stars regs
c) the ftp rng was rigged in his favour without him knowing
d) he just ran badly on stars and is actually the stone cold nuts

e) He likes to gamble and will accept negative EV on Stars just like he plays negative EV craps. Doesn't necessarily prove or disprove anything about FTP.
Internet Poker's Top 10 Winners & Losers By Game Type "All Time" (since HSDB tracking) Quote
12-24-2011 , 03:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ix.spider.uk
The hate for hasu is absurd. He clearly stated he thought variance was the most likely explanation. That doesn't mean that it shouldn't be considered whether Ivey did or could have cheated - even if he didn't. He was one of the owners of the web site. That is reason enough to question. It doesn't matter whether it might seem unfathomable - the notion that someone like Potripper could come along was unfathomable to most people before it happened. It is still a point worth considering. Essentially abusing someone for noting this is so ridiculous, especially when they are a High Stakes reg, have actually played Ivey, and actually add value to this forum.
Ragetard fanboys on the internet aren't to good at actually reading people's posts before they write replies.
Internet Poker's Top 10 Winners & Losers By Game Type "All Time" (since HSDB tracking) Quote
12-24-2011 , 03:21 PM
Why isn't "scout326" on the loser list?
Internet Poker's Top 10 Winners & Losers By Game Type "All Time" (since HSDB tracking) Quote
12-24-2011 , 04:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vgler

There´s no doubt that Ivey is one of the best poker players. BUT if you ignore all of those recent scandals and disclosures you´re just borderline naive.

PI´s winning rate in nearly ALL games is 3x better than the best HS regs.

That´s just an absurd edge.

Apart from that, PA is the biggest multi-accounter of all times. I really can´t admire those guys and their legends...
I too, cannot get over these things.
Internet Poker's Top 10 Winners & Losers By Game Type "All Time" (since HSDB tracking) Quote
12-24-2011 , 09:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parvenu90
Why isn't "scout326" on the loser list?
HighstakesDB doesn't track the games where he's lost most of his money.
Internet Poker's Top 10 Winners & Losers By Game Type "All Time" (since HSDB tracking) Quote
12-24-2011 , 09:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by THAKID
Ya not to mention Ivey plays obviously very leaky every time I watch him play on tv
lol, show me some leaks. Pretty funny how people are questioning Ivey's results since they might be the result of cheating while he's been crushing live for years and years.
Internet Poker's Top 10 Winners & Losers By Game Type "All Time" (since HSDB tracking) Quote
12-24-2011 , 11:27 PM
how many of the biggest losers in NLHE are Guy? i see 2 screennames that i recognize as him.
Internet Poker's Top 10 Winners & Losers By Game Type "All Time" (since HSDB tracking) Quote
12-25-2011 , 12:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by djz
how many of the biggest losers in NLHE are Guy? i see 2 screennames that i recognize as him.
noataima, elmariachimacho, lady marmelade and patatino

IIRC if you add up all his rumoured SNs he lost somewhere between 25 and 30 million on FTP.
Internet Poker's Top 10 Winners & Losers By Game Type "All Time" (since HSDB tracking) Quote
12-25-2011 , 12:35 AM
I want to preface this by saying I'm probably one of the biggest Ivey nut huggers in existence...but...

People defending him without even an ounce of doubt in their minds are being very naive. I've seen this EXACT pattern emerge over and over again on this site.

With Jungleman and DIH and Girah it was the same crap. People defending them and calling doubters idiots and conspiracy theorists.

Look, people HAVE brought out some evidence. The evidence is that Ivey's stats don't really make sense on the face of them. His stats, when looked at by experts, seem to have many leaks. And yet he wins at a rate which seems impossible even if he did happen to have an edge on the very best players.

You have to look at evidence like this and think that something seems a little fishy. I hate to say it, because I love the way Ivey has dominated the game of poker. It's amazing to behold. I love the guy's mystique.

But either he's been very lucky, or so good that nobody at all understands what he's doing theoretically as a poker player--or maybe, just maybe, he's a very good player who also had some help to be even better.

As for motivation, greed is always the answer. Don't think why he would bother when he made so much money in the game--none of us knows what he spends, what his debts were, what he actually won in lost in various pit games, business ventures, his divorce, etc. And even the richest people in the world will do shady stuff to get richer.

People motivated solely by money are probably more likely to cheat if they think the risk is worth the reward. If Ivey did cheat, he likely calculated correctly because its difficult to imagine it will ever be proven now.

But that said, based on the evidence at hand--he's either very, very lucky, or supernaturally gifted to a degree that makes Einstein look like Corky--or he cheated.
Internet Poker's Top 10 Winners & Losers By Game Type "All Time" (since HSDB tracking) Quote
12-25-2011 , 12:42 AM
I would never accuse someone of cheating without any proof.
Especially when he's proved he's a genius live as well making it more likely that his results are genuine.
Internet Poker's Top 10 Winners & Losers By Game Type "All Time" (since HSDB tracking) Quote
12-25-2011 , 02:05 AM
What about 5-10 heads up
Internet Poker's Top 10 Winners & Losers By Game Type "All Time" (since HSDB tracking) Quote
12-25-2011 , 02:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by loveminuszero
1)

Preface: as you can tell by the avatar, I am obviously biased

Do you have any proof that PA staked him? People say this a lot but I've never seen proof, and Ziigmund has denied it. BTW he was still an over 800k winner on FTP due to his winnings in all the other games, and is up 1.2 million this year on Stars, so the condescending quotation marks on the word pro seems out of order. Unless I've misread your post, you seem to be mocking the earnings of someone who has made more in the last ~4 years than you are likely to make in the next couple of decades - unless you are actually a very good player that I don't know of, but I'm playing the odds here since its NVG so it's like 1000-1 that you are a high-earning pro
Don't know about the internet but I can almost guarantee you that Ilari was staked by Patrik in the WSOP 2009 cash games as the games were 4K/8K PLO (I think) which would mean 800K 100bb deep, or about 1/4 of Ilari's hsdb roll and (I'm guessing here) maybe 1/7th of Ilari's total roll. As bad as Ilari can tilt at times, I'm betting he was staked. Prob (again guessing) by Patrik.
Internet Poker's Top 10 Winners & Losers By Game Type "All Time" (since HSDB tracking) Quote
12-25-2011 , 02:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by idontpooop
Don't know about the internet but I can almost guarantee you that Ilari was staked by Patrik in the WSOP 2009 cash games as the games were 4K/8K PLO (I think) which would mean 800K 100bb deep, or about 1/4 of Ilari's hsdb roll and (I'm guessing here) maybe 1/7th of Ilari's total roll. As bad as Ilari can tilt at times, I'm betting he was staked. Prob (again guessing) by Patrik.
I also believe its pretty common knowledge they played on each others accounts.
Internet Poker's Top 10 Winners & Losers By Game Type "All Time" (since HSDB tracking) Quote
12-25-2011 , 03:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gorvnice
I want to preface this by saying I'm probably one of the biggest Ivey nut huggers in existence...but...

People defending him without even an ounce of doubt in their minds are being very naive. I've seen this EXACT pattern emerge over and over again on this site.

With Jungleman and DIH and Girah it was the same crap. People defending them and calling doubters idiots and conspiracy theorists.

Look, people HAVE brought out some evidence. The evidence is that Ivey's stats don't really make sense on the face of them. His stats, when looked at by experts, seem to have many leaks. And yet he wins at a rate which seems impossible even if he did happen to have an edge on the very best players.

You have to look at evidence like this and think that something seems a little fishy. I hate to say it, because I love the way Ivey has dominated the game of poker. It's amazing to behold. I love the guy's mystique.

But either he's been very lucky, or so good that nobody at all understands what he's doing theoretically as a poker player--or maybe, just maybe, he's a very good player who also had some help to be even better.

As for motivation, greed is always the answer. Don't think why he would bother when he made so much money in the game--none of us knows what he spends, what his debts were, what he actually won in lost in various pit games, business ventures, his divorce, etc. And even the richest people in the world will do shady stuff to get richer.

People motivated solely by money are probably more likely to cheat if they think the risk is worth the reward. If Ivey did cheat, he likely calculated correctly because its difficult to imagine it will ever be proven now.

But that said, based on the evidence at hand--he's either very, very lucky, or supernaturally gifted to a degree that makes Einstein look like Corky--or he cheated.
yepp, this.
Internet Poker's Top 10 Winners & Losers By Game Type "All Time" (since HSDB tracking) Quote
12-25-2011 , 03:10 AM
god i still cant believe how many ******s there still are that just look at these lists or tableratings and swear its actually accurate or even close to being their whole online poker career that year. this thread shouldn't have so many pages
Internet Poker's Top 10 Winners & Losers By Game Type "All Time" (since HSDB tracking) Quote
12-25-2011 , 03:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by girahy
I also believe its pretty common knowledge they played on each others accounts.


They definitely did early on...

Quote:
FinddaGrind: U R THE BIGGEST F IDIOT IN A POKER
BUSINESS
FinddaGrind: how long u gonna play now?
Mark Vos: lol
Mark Vos: 8.75 minutes
FinddaGrind: go &!$& yourself instead of waisting my time
Mark Vos: haha
Mark Vos: well
Mark Vos: we’ve at least worked out its NOT patrik
Mark Vos: now im mildly curious
but my guess is that they stopped when PA was made Team FT. Just a guess but I imagine they would be more careful with that kind of thing at that point.

As for idontpoop re: Ilari being staked in the huge 3k-6k plo games in 2009: again that's just speculation. at the time of the 2009 WSOP Ilari was up a lot on FTP and had coinflip and powerpoker sponsoring him, plus since he was winning on FTP we can assume he was liekly to be winning when he played on Euro networks like Betfair... he lost 3.5 million in Chinese poker during that trip (or it might have been a different one a few months later if I'm getting the mixed up) so he obviously had a lot more money than we can guess just from his HighstakesDB graph
Internet Poker's Top 10 Winners & Losers By Game Type "All Time" (since HSDB tracking) Quote
12-25-2011 , 03:57 AM
im bored but forced to do this
Internet Poker's Top 10 Winners & Losers By Game Type "All Time" (since HSDB tracking) Quote
12-25-2011 , 05:00 AM
I wonder if any site has tracked all the tv cash games and has stats on that, I'd like to know over all whose the biggest winner in TV cash games and what the number is...
Internet Poker's Top 10 Winners & Losers By Game Type "All Time" (since HSDB tracking) Quote
12-25-2011 , 05:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KajunKenny
I wonder if any site has tracked all the tv cash games and has stats on that, I'd like to know over all whose the biggest winner in TV cash games and what the number is...
Don't know about any other TV cash games, but here's the results for High stakes Poker:


Quote:
Originally Posted by whosnext
GRAND TOTAL OF ALL HANDS SHOWN IN ALL SEASONS (SEASONS 1-7)


Tom Dwan +1,756,500
David Benyamine +904,150
Johnny Chan +616,600
Mike Matasow +609,350
Doyle Brunson +538,150
Patrik Antonius +418,490
Phil Ruffin +396,700
Phil Ivey +332,400
Eli Elezra +312,650
Erick Lindgren +273,550
Haralobos Voulgaris +272,200
Mimi Tran +251,400
David (Viffer) Peat +209,400
Brad Booth +205,600
Guy Laliberte +188,950
Brian Brandon +117,400
Amnon Filippi +113,800
Paul Wasicka +94,100
Barry Greenstein +92,200
Amir Nasseri +80,600
Bob Safai +76,700
Jennifer Harman +67,500
Dan Harmetz +63,800
David Grey +51,400
Joe Hachem +45,600
Ted Forrest +45,500
Michael Mizrachi +41,200
Chris Ferguson +32,800
Bob Stupak +25,800
Gabe Kaplan +22,800
Freddy Deeb +11,250
Nick Cassavetes +3,300
Bill Chen -2,000
Antonio Esfandiari -5,650
Phil Hellmuth -21,250
John Juanda -36,600
Brandon Adams -54,300
Cory Zeidman -57,000
Phil Laak -57,100
Dan Shak -60,100
Mike Baxter -63,000
Minh Ly -63,200
David Williams -65,100
Jerry Buss -69,500
Illya Trincher -73,050
Gus Hansen -80,100
Peter Eastgate -81,000
Howard Lederer -85,800
John D'Agostino -86,900
Vanessa Selbst -91,150
Victor Ramdin -100,300
Andrew Robl -107,700
Sam Simon -108,700
Antonio Salorio -114,200
Dennis Phillips -116,400
Jonathan Duhamel -119,500
Bertrand (ElkY) Grospellier -120,300
Julian Movsesian -133,800
Bill Perkins -134,050
Lex Veldhuis -137,100
Brian Townsend -143,300
Alan Meltzer -154,400
Fred Chamanara -158,300
Jason Mercier -165,500
Sam Farha -171,650
Andreas Hoivold -189,300
Todd Brunson -202,400
Jamie Gold -217,140
Daniel Alaei -222,300
Erik Boneta -233,400
Shawn Sheikhan -243,900
Dario Minieri -328,400
Ilari (Ziigmund) Sahamies -362,150
Robert Croak -372,500
Bill Klein -430,700
Phil Galfond -431,500
Daniel Negreanu -2,000,150
Internet Poker's Top 10 Winners & Losers By Game Type "All Time" (since HSDB tracking) Quote
12-25-2011 , 05:40 AM
Daniel Negreanu -2,000,150

wow

jus wowow

over few 100 hands?
Internet Poker's Top 10 Winners & Losers By Game Type "All Time" (since HSDB tracking) Quote
12-25-2011 , 06:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KajunKenny
I wonder if any site has tracked all the tv cash games and has stats on that, I'd like to know over all whose the biggest winner in TV cash games and what the number is...
Don't think anybody has done all TV cash games but there was an epic effort a while back to track all HSP winnings (seasons 1-7) on 2+2, these are the final tallies from that effort:

Top 10 winners:

Tom Dwan +1,756,500
David Benyamine +904,150
Johnny Chan +616,600
Mike Matasow +609,350
Doyle Brunson +538,150
Patrik Antonius +418,490
Phil Ruffin +396,700
Phil Ivey +332,400
Eli Elezra +312,650
Erick Lindgren +273,550

Top 10 losers

Jamie Gold -217,140
Daniel Alaei -222,300
Erik Boneta -233,400
Shawn Sheikhan -243,900
Dario Minieri -328,400
Ilari Sahamies -362,150
Robert Croak -372,500
Bill Klein -430,700
Phil Galfond -431,500
Daniel Negreanu -2,000,150

________________________________________

btw re: Ivey's crazy / suspicious looking stats & tendencies. I re-watched a load of televised cash games after I looked up his stats and to be honest, Ivey plays very similarly live as well, i.e. lots of pots OOP, rabid blind defense, check-raising a ton and just generally being more aggressive than a drunk Russian bear who's just come back from work to find his wife in bed with a panda (which is very aggressive btw). If he had HEM, his redline would make all of BBV instajizz imo.

Also if there were any superusing / advantageous card distribution for him on FTP I think it would be reflected in his W$SD stat but for all his NLH hands this stat is 48%. Don't get me wrong, I love a good scandal, but based on what I've seen I can't help thinking that Ivey just is a soul-pwning wizard.
Internet Poker's Top 10 Winners & Losers By Game Type "All Time" (since HSDB tracking) Quote
12-25-2011 , 07:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gorvnice
I want to preface this by saying I'm probably one of the biggest Ivey nut huggers in existence...but...

People defending him without even an ounce of doubt in their minds are being very naive. I've seen this EXACT pattern emerge over and over again on this site.

With Jungleman and DIH and Girah it was the same crap. People defending them and calling doubters idiots and conspiracy theorists.


Look, people HAVE brought out some evidence. The evidence is that Ivey's stats don't really make sense on the face of them. His stats, when looked at by experts, seem to have many leaks. And yet he wins at a rate which seems impossible even if he did happen to have an edge on the very best players.

You have to look at evidence like this and think that something seems a little fishy. I hate to say it, because I love the way Ivey has dominated the game of poker. It's amazing to behold. I love the guy's mystique.

But either he's been very lucky, or so good that nobody at all understands what he's doing theoretically as a poker player--or maybe, just maybe, he's a very good player who also had some help to be even better.
As for motivation, greed is always the answer. Don't think why he would bother when he made so much money in the game--none of us knows what he spends, what his debts were, what he actually won in lost in various pit games, business ventures, his divorce, etc. And even the richest people in the world will do shady stuff to get richer.

People motivated solely by money are probably more likely to cheat if they think the risk is worth the reward. If Ivey did cheat, he likely calculated correctly because its difficult to imagine it will ever be proven now.

But that said, based on the evidence at hand--he's either very, very lucky, or supernaturally gifted to a degree that makes Einstein look like Corky--or he cheated.
This. And the bold bit in particular.
Internet Poker's Top 10 Winners & Losers By Game Type "All Time" (since HSDB tracking) Quote
12-25-2011 , 08:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RangeyMcTriplmerge
Also if there were any superusing / advantageous card distribution for him on FTP I think it would be reflected in his W$SD stat but for all his NLH hands this stat is 48%. Don't get me wrong, I love a good scandal, but based on what I've seen I can't help thinking that Ivey just is a soul-pwning wizard.
Completely agree. I don't think I've heard any of the players he regularly played against suggest he could be cheating in any way. In fact, all the top pros repeatedly says how out of the world his play is. Why is there any suggestion he cheated? It's ridiculous.
Internet Poker's Top 10 Winners & Losers By Game Type "All Time" (since HSDB tracking) Quote
12-25-2011 , 08:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by WAtR
Completely agree. I don't think I've heard any of the players he regularly played against suggest he could be cheating in any way. In fact, all the top pros repeatedly says how out of the world his play is. Why is there any suggestion he cheated? It's ridiculous.
Conclusion: He doesn't even know he he is cheating. None of the pros know except for Lederer/Fergerson.
Internet Poker's Top 10 Winners & Losers By Game Type "All Time" (since HSDB tracking) Quote

      
m