Quote:
Originally Posted by BlkJakShelak
This link says this is between RB and PokerStars. Is that correct?
Pokerstars, et. al. Pokerstars is just the first named Defendant in the case. Full Tilt, Bitar, etc. follows.
I believe... (off top of my head) The complaint was amended back when they added Lederer, Furst, etc. Then, Bitar filed a claim for his seized property (bank accounts, homes, etc.) Subsequently or in the same filing, Bitar requested additional time for responding to the complaints against him and in defense of his right to the seized property.
This document is just the court granting him the additional time, for whatever reason (probably by law, he has x amount of days after the filing of his claim for the property or from the date of the amended complaint)