Quote:
Originally Posted by Professionalpoker
Can a California tribe launch real-money intrastate online poker on its own, without waiting for statewide legislation to pass? That possibility has been discussed, and anticipated, inside the gaming industry for months, but it looks like we’re on the verge of seeing somebody finally trying it.
http://agentmarco.com/santa-ysabel-online-poker/
This announcement sets up an interesting test case scenario:
Two prospective customers, let's make them California residents over 21 (or 18), go to Santa Ysabel reservation smoke shop and each deposits $100 cash.
One customer opens up his laptop while on the Res land. The other customer drives a mile or two down the road to where he can get wireless access off the Res land.
The Tribe credits each of them $100 in real money chips on some financial database, perhaps on Res land, and that credit is entered into the game server, perhaps on Res land, but perhaps not,when they sit at a HU table.
The customers play one hand of HUNL, shoving before the flop
The winner collects his cashout back at the Tribe res in cash.
We now have tribal poker offered for real money intrastate within the State of California to a player off the tribal lands.
Let’s assume both California and DOJ seek a cease and desist order from an appropriate Court, Federal or State.
1. Does the Tribe operation of this game violate the IGBA ? Does the Tribe operation of this game violate State law, or is it covered by the Compact between the Tribe and State ?
2. Does the Tribe offering this poker game to the player off the tribal lands violate its State compact ?
3. If the answer to #2 is “no violation”, is every Tribe in California with an identical compact legally able to open for business ?
Bitcoin angle being played out ?
What this means for bitcoin market :
The Tribe has indicated an intent to accept bitcoins for deposits.
Since bitcoins can be obtained independent of the Tribe's knowledge, the coins could provide a means of player deposit directly sent to a deposit address whose owner sits on the Tribal land.
One hopes that the Tribe, which is reportedly underwater financially, can pay for the legal defense of its initiative.