everything is a scam these days, duh.

+1

p.s.-- When someone can confirm beyond a reasonable doubt an assertion that they are making by the release of evidence entirely within their purview; but, refuses to do so, one would be a fool and a rube to believe that assertion.

there's no comma after but

I'm not sure if you're saying he is willing to release evidence or if he isn't...since it seems as if he is.

I think I agree with you.

No. I am saying he is NOT willing to release evidence openly and completely. No one would make the bet he wants to take because all the information to control the outcome of the bet is in his hands, e.g., he could provide only winning SNs and exclude losers (to say nothing of possible chip dumping a la Girah to fatten out those wins at some point) if he defines winnings like all of us do as a net positive amount of won dollars over lost dollars.

At the bottom of it, the entire thing is silly and done for self-promotion.

Let him play on PStars for a year and if his girraf grows with winnings against known verifiable opponents -- good for him. If not, bad for him and who cares.


"Terms of the bet if anyone wants it:

- If i can't prove beyond doubt that i've won at least $5,000,000 I'll pay out $60,000
- If i can prove beyond dount (sic) that i've won at least $5,000,000 I win only $30,000

To motivate me to get closer to the $8 million in winnings, i'd like a bonus of $20,000 for each addition million proved.

So if i prove $5,100,000 for example i win $30,000. I win $50,000 if i prove between $6,000,000 and $7,000,000 etc"

bump