Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread

08-04-2020 , 02:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
I'm being somewhat silly but am also correct.
Dragging this on for hours in the middle of the night to get that sweet dunk?

Let the hate flow through you, chez. Let it flow.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
08-04-2020 , 02:31 AM
@D2
Quote:
And you are once again displaying your ability to draw conclusions that are totally wrong.

One day you might stop blaming other people for that.
.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
08-04-2020 , 02:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Dragging this on for hours in the middle of the night to get that sweet dunk?

Let the hate flow through you, chez. Let it flow.
I don't do hate thanks. This has been mildly amusing and quite revealing though - sorry if that's not allowed. Yes I can be childish at times, mostly when it's of no importance.

Do I take it you are aware of the question? You don't seem to think I'm wrong.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
08-04-2020 , 02:34 AM
Oh, haha, you meant on UP. Ok, right, I'll grant you 1/2 point for that. Jeez man, for real, you dragged it out for that long?

And if I knew you read that thread I'd dunk on you a lot harder there. It's great when you don't respond.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
08-04-2020 , 02:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
I don't do hate thanks. This has been mildly amusing and quite revealing though - sorry if that's not allowed.
Revealing how? In a way that makes other people look worse, iyo? Largely helped by you dragging this out for hours?

Yeah, that's called a "dunk". Welcome to the club!
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
08-04-2020 , 02:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
Oh, haha, you meant on UP. Ok, right, I'll grant you 1/2 point for that. Jeez man, for real, you dragged it out for that long?

And if I knew you read that thread I'd dunk on you a lot harder there. It's great when you don't respond.
wow finally.

The answer might make sense to you as well now. Post away I enjoy observing the cool kiddies at play.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
08-04-2020 , 02:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
wow finally.

what a pavlova
Lol, do you think you came out of this looking good?
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
08-04-2020 , 02:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Revealing how? In a way that makes other people look worse, iyo? Largely helped by you dragging this out for hours?

Yeah, that's called a "dunk". Welcome to the club!
A bit of dunking is fine. Being here just to dunk - hmmm maybe less so.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
08-04-2020 , 02:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
A bit of dunking is fine. Being here just to dunk - hmmm maybe less so.
idk, I post a lot more news items and general content here than you do. This dunking today represents a pretty significant % of your posting contributions to this forum. I think you might spend more of your time here looking for dunks than I do.

Pretty shameful behavior, chez. Glass houses and stones and all.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
08-04-2020 , 02:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
Lol, do you think you came out of this looking good?
I dont care about your looks. Maybe you will at some point consider this:

Quote:
And you are once again displaying your ability to draw conclusions that are totally wrong.

One day you might stop blaming other people for that.
This could be considered an actual flaw

and getting so heated about something so silly. ffs man
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
08-04-2020 , 02:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
A bit of dunking is fine. Being here just to dunk - hmmm maybe less so.
I mean, I'm not a sore loser, I guess congratulations is in order. You did very well, and I'm sure all of the readers of this thread will appreciate the raw skill, talent and dexterity you exhibited for posterity.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
08-04-2020 , 02:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
I dont care about your looks. Maybe you will at some point consider this:


This could be considered an actual flaw

and getting so heated about something so silly. ffs man
I was getting heated because you were gaslighting, nothing to do with the merits of the matter at hand.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
08-04-2020 , 02:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
I mean, I'm not a sore loser, I guess congratulations is in order. You did very well, and I'm sure all of the readers of this thread will appreciate the raw skill, talent and dexterity you exhibited for posterity.
All I did was answer a question and then not remind you what it was when you denied asking it and went off on one

There's no winners or losers unless you have an issue with reaching false conclusions. Maybe take a bit of a win on that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
I was getting heated because you were gaslighting, nothing to do with the merits of the matter at hand.
lol. You were not being gaslighted, you were just plain and straightforwardly wrong.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
08-04-2020 , 02:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
All I did was answer a question and then not remind you what it was when you denied asking it and went off on one

There's no winners or losers unless you have an issue with reaching false conclusions. Maybe take a bit of a win on that.
I think this can be used as a teaching moment.

I did not immediately reach any conclusion - I asked you for evidence for your claim, and then I reached a conclusion based on your repeated inability or unwillingness to provide it. This is a standard method for reaching conclusions. The fact I reached an incorrect conclusion does not invalidate the method; as someone who posts on a poker forum, you should be aware of the pitfalls of results-oriented thinking.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
08-04-2020 , 03:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
I think this can be used as a teaching moment.

I did not immediately reach any conclusion - I asked you for evidence for your claim, and then I reached a conclusion based on your inability or unwillingness to provide it. This is a standard method for reaching conclusions. The fact I reached an incorrect conclusion does not invalidate the method; as someone who posts on a poker forum, you should be aware of the pitfalls of results-oriented thinking.
Reached a wrong conclusion based on your biases. If you had a bit more awareness then you would have put it on a range more effectively. You might even have realised that I was so confident because I could just see the post while you have too much faith in weaker tools like memory and searching skills. Me telling you when the post was should have been a serious clue that i was not making it up.

If you learn from this then you can do weaken your biases for the future. Or not - so much easier to blame someone else for your mistakes but that just stengthens your biases. Hopefully I biased in thinking you will probably opt for the later.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
08-04-2020 , 03:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
Reached a wrong conclusion based on your biases.
Very true.

He was biased by thinking you were not one of the pathetic dunkers who strings people along for hours for your own amusement.

He was wrong; you are exactly that.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
08-04-2020 , 03:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
Reached a wrong conclusion based on your biases. If you had a bit more awareness then you would have put it on a range more effectively. You might even have realised that I was so confident because I could just see the post while you have too much faith in weaker tools like memory and searching skills. Me telling you when the post was should have been a serious clue that i was not making it up.

If you learn from this then you can do better next time. Or not - much easier to blame someone else for your mistakes.
Had it been someone else other than you, I would have probably done those things. You have form for the sort of thing I described upthread, so, I guess, well done for balancing out your range. I'll adjust accordingly next time.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
08-04-2020 , 03:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
Had it been someone else other than you, I would have probably done those things. You have form for the sort of thing I described upthread, so I guess, well done for balancing out your range. I'll adjust accordingly next time.
I don't have form but you definitely think I do. So kudos if this helps you in the right direction.

Not a complete waste of time after all. Who would have thought?
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
08-04-2020 , 03:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
I don't have form but you definitely think I do. So kudos if this helps you in the right direction.

Not a complete waste of time after all. Who would have thought?
I try to learn from my mistakes. The lesson I have learned from this is that when dealing with you, I always need to play the man, not the ball.

Not sure if that's the reputation you want, but it's certainly the reputation you deserve.

Last edited by d2_e4; 08-04-2020 at 03:12 AM.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
08-04-2020 , 03:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
I try to learn from my mistakes.
Me too and there's nothing wrong with making mistakes

This reminded me of a time I was playing in a chess tournament as kid. Got into a ferocious end game where a piece down I almost forced a pawn through.

In the car on the way home, Dad remarked something about the opponents bishop and I was convinced he didn't have a bishop (in the end game). After a long argument when I was absolutely convinced there was no bishop I checked the record and yes there was a bishop of course there was a bishop!!!. This was in a game that lasted probably about 2+ hours of total focus and I couldn't remember a bishop! A stunning moment in my life from which I leaned a lot.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
08-04-2020 , 03:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
A stunning moment in my life from which I leaned a lot.
I call.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
08-04-2020 , 03:22 AM
Maybe. I think it was one of several pivotal moments. I can still remember some of the conversation (or at least I think I can)
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
08-04-2020 , 03:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
Maybe. I think it was one of several pivotal moments. I can still remember some of the conversation (or at least I think I can)
Oh, I am taking your recollection of the conversation as though it occurred verbatim. I just don't believe, based on my various interactions with you, that you learnt anywhere near as much from it as you think you did.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
08-04-2020 , 03:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
Oh, I am taking your recollection of the conversation as though it occurred verbatim. I just don't believe, based on my various interactions with you, that you learnt anywhere near as much from it as you think you did.
Maybe but then again you may need to adjust your view of me a lot more. And I'm not taking it as verbatim even though I remember it very clearly.

I also suspect I'm one of very few people who had had a car crash, remembers exactly what happened and thinks I'm wrong.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
08-04-2020 , 03:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
Maybe but then again you may need to adjust your view of me a lot more.
Are you aware of the mechanism by which this process generally takes place? Hint: it's not by telling people to adjust their view of you.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote

      
m