Open Side Menu Go to the Top

01-04-2023 , 11:25 AM
the human trafficking and rape charges are not confirmed yet, so you shouldn't accuse him now of that imo.

Elon reinstated him on twitter, Rogan praised him on his show. that all happened after similar and previous accusations. I don't know much about him other than these few details and that indeed lies were spread about him. but I haven't looked much into him.

let's see what this case brings.
if true, it's bad.
but we don't know much now. we don't know who the victims are and nothing. it could still be a set up.

assange was set up, MJ was set up possibly. where there are celebrities there are set ups. that's all I know.

I don't defending anything, I am defending the truth only. that's the principle.

Last edited by washoe; 01-04-2023 at 11:36 AM.
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread) Quote
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread)
$25m Guaranteed WPM on CoinPoker
Join the action now
Daily Rewards • Splash Pots • CoinRaces
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread)
01-04-2023 , 11:27 AM
Rogan praised him on his show.

This should clear up any confusion about washoes motivations.
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread) Quote
01-04-2023 , 11:49 AM
Rogan is the biggest podcast in the world. there are reasons for that.

Tate overdid it with the misogyny.

I'm completely on board with Rogans statements here: https://www.newsweek.com/joe-rogan-d...ia-ban-1740123

that's exactly what I'm thinking what he says there. A little bit too much and that tate screwed up.

I said that I actually didn't like tate from the get go. and here is why: he scammed his users by love bombing them and pretending it's the naked girls they are chatting to. when in fact it was his brother and him messaging and love bombing customers.

Last edited by washoe; 01-04-2023 at 11:56 AM.
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread) Quote
01-04-2023 , 11:54 AM
anyway, let's see what the future brings. will be interesting what Rogan and Elson say now...
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread) Quote
01-04-2023 , 11:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuepee
WHat i have is years in senior management and mandatory requirement to attend many HR consulting presentations and Conferences where that was the common statement said as if fact, and i have never heard it questioned, so i have always just accepted the 'Experts' knew what they were saying with regards to most marriages being relationships that started in the workplace.

Makes sense to, if 'Most' just means the biggest cohort as compared to others and not 50+1%.

In the old hierarchy of the 4 categories i would quickly create i would say :

- work
- highschool/Uni love
- random adult meetings outside school or work
- friend or family introduction
Well, unless there are other studies on this out there saying differently (I haven't found them), I feel that those experts may have been misleading you. Since the late 1940s, meeting through friends was most common (then in the last decade, the Internet took over as #1 and meeting at a bar/restaurant slipped into #2.

Meeting at work was #2 from around the mid-1980s to the mid-1990s but otherwise always less common than that, ie never a plurality.
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread) Quote
01-04-2023 , 12:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by washoe
Rogan is the biggest podcast in the world. there are reasons for that.

Tate overdid it with the misogyny.

I'm completely on board with Rogans statements here: https://www.newsweek.com/joe-rogan-d...ia-ban-1740123

that's exactly what I'm thinking what he says there. A little bit too much and that tate screwed up.

I said that I actually didn't like tate from the get go. and here is why: he scammed his users by love bombing them and pretending it's the naked girls they are chatting to. when in fact it was his brother and him messaging and love bombing customers.
Tate runs a total scam junk online course called hustlers university, its not even debatable that its a scam.

Joe R praised it, not because he has any motivations, just that JR often says off the cuff things about stuff he is very poorly informed about, the problem is then that elements of his audience take this misinformed off the cuff chit chat as gospel truth.
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread) Quote
01-04-2023 , 12:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by IAMTHISNOW
Also as regards the consistency of Peterson.

You can look at contemporary positions on current affairs, they are all monetizable algo opinions that clickbait well on social media.

It is interesting that he has been horribly strawmanning Derrida since the 90s though.

The moment someone takes that stern lecturing pointy finger tone to camera, you know they are FOS.
Again, it is wild that anyone can have strong opinions on Peterson and yet dont know this. It perfectly illustrates how you (and 99% of his critics) entire perception of him is based solely on agenda driven attacks (normally in the form of carefully cultivated short YouTube clips purposefully removed from relevant context) and not on actually listening/reading his arguments.

Peterson's entire worldview, which he developed a long, long time ago basically argues that French post-modernists and their extremely cynical ideas are the foundation of what Peterson calls Cultural Marxism, that has pervaded from the academy into society at large and is actively destroying Western civilization.

I am not saying that if you read Maps of Meaning or listened to Peterson talk about postmodernism you would agree with his ideas or have a higher opinion on him. Very likely it would be lower. But at the same time, you should realize you have strong convictions despite very little actual knowledge or insight.
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread) Quote
01-04-2023 , 12:43 PM
There are reasons to be skeptical of Peterson--- basically the exact same reasons to be skeptical of anyone who comes from no where and explodes onto the scene (Greta Thunberg, etc)- it's the whole "the revolution will not be televised" concept.
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread) Quote
01-04-2023 , 12:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dunyain
Again, it is wild that anyone can have strong opinions on Peterson and yet dont know this. It perfectly illustrates how you (and 99% of his critics) entire perception of him is based solely on agenda driven attacks and not on actually listening/reading his arguments.
.
This is a total nonsense of an argument.

I can be fully aware of his recent arguments and positions without having a complete biographical understanding of his positions.

I dont agree with Peterson very much if at all with anything he says now, but dont know what he was saying in the 90s, so what?

I dont know what people I agree with were necessarily saying in the 90s

I have seen his contemporary stawmanning of Derrida, a tilt at windmills of epic proportions, I dont know what is gained by knowing he has done this in the 90s.

Also I dont know what this has to do with his hot takes on things like the war in Ukraine and Global warming.
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread) Quote
01-04-2023 , 12:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by IAMTHISNOW
Tate runs a total scam junk online course called hustlers university, its not even debatable that its a scam.

Joe R praised it, not because he has any motivations, just that JR often says off the cuff things about stuff he is very poorly informed about, the problem is then that elements of his audience take this misinformed off the cuff chit chat as gospel truth.
how do you know? are you one of his subscribers??

that thing is netting him about 8M per month. ~6.5M pounds. he has 130k subscribers paying him 49 pounds a month.

he would have to be very, very stupid to do the alleged crimes now.

Last edited by washoe; 01-04-2023 at 12:53 PM.
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread) Quote
01-04-2023 , 12:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by washoe
Tate overdid it with the misogyny.
ya don't say
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread) Quote
01-04-2023 , 12:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by washoe
he would have to be very, very stupid to do the alleged crimes now.
Criminals actually do very stupid things. Very, very, very stupid things.
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread) Quote
01-04-2023 , 12:55 PM
maybe maybe not. Google his father. he was a chess grandmaster, a famous one. that would have been a terrible move.
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread) Quote
01-04-2023 , 12:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by washoe
maybe maybe not. Google his father. he was a chess grandmaster, a famous one. that would have been a terrible move.
Are you saying that rich, famous people can't be criminals?
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread) Quote
01-04-2023 , 01:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by washoe
maybe maybe not. Google his father. he was a chess grandmaster, a famous one. that would have been a terrible move.
Never heard of him and I know some chess.

But googled, he was an IM and not a GM.
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread) Quote
01-04-2023 , 01:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
Never heard of him and I know some chess.

But googled, he was an IM and not a GM.
Emory was popular enough in the US though obviously not with everyone. He played rather aggressive exciting chess if I recall.
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread) Quote
01-04-2023 , 02:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
Never heard of him and I know some chess.

But googled, he was an IM and not a GM.

why was he not a grandmaster if he beat gms?


"Tate earned a reputation as a creative and dangerous tactician on the U.S. chess circuit, where he won about 80 tournament games against grandmasters" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emory_Tate

maybe bc he was before your time. I wonder if laggy knows him being a chess player.

Last edited by washoe; 01-04-2023 at 02:54 PM.
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread) Quote
01-04-2023 , 02:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuepee
I cannot figure out what point you think you making other then you feel a need to be perceived as if in conflict to me?

There is nothing wrong with citing personal experience and 'feels' on a conversation like this. This is a DISCUSSION forum and not a University citation only forum.

We can discuss personal experience, we relay our learnings and others can simply agree or disagree or say 'interesting but not my experience'.
I'm glad you feel this way, because the subject matter at hand here, specifically dating, and even more so with respect to the workplace, is a major issue for me personally, and is what attracts me to this thread and is why I'm glad that it has been resurrected in a sense from its previous incarnation in the forum.

Without further ado, and with the disclaimer that this could be viewed as quite the sob story and is certainly the longest post I've ever made by a large margin, here is my personal anecdotes on the matter, with a conclusion relevant to the topic at the very end:

I am a deeply emotionally inhibited person to the point where it is a serious disturbance in my personality without question, with intimacy issues being a paramount facet of this dynamic. At work, people will give me a wide berth just walking by me in an attempt at politeness, because the sense of tension is palpable, but it is misguided because I don't want that special treatment, though it is understandable.

When it comes to the subject of flirting, courting, and the like, I am admittedly dysfunctional, and I will give an impression of interest in woman indiscriminately, which is problematic as it is deceitful, but there is a clear basis for this, not a sufficient justification to be sure, which is that I'm not merely interested in relationships, but also in dire need of human connection in a general sense independent of romance, for instance just friendly talk with guys, who I have no romantic interest in, being a heterosexual male. The specific impression of interest in women that I convey is through eye contact almost exclusively for the most part, but I'm not ignorant of how it is received, whether a measure of interest on the part of women is generated that is.

But eye contact for me is dysfunctional in a broader sense with all people, because I will make eye contact with anyone from afar, that is not from a distance that would be considered within the radius of conversation, which includes men, who sometimes will subsequently approach me with a romantic interest because they are homosexual. But when in comes to actual conversational circumstances I find it extremely difficult to make eye contact where it is required, and is the norm. At work I was once even mocked for it by a male coworker who aped my tendency. It might seem insensitive, but then again I can understand how he might have taken some personal offense because the eye contact I lack from up close is accompanied by considerable emotional distress often expressed with wincing or grimacing (the distress is considerable). I'm going to be frank here, being close to a person physically is inherently a fight or flight situation, except that the fear has been thoroughly suppressed from the point of my earliest childhood memories into a state of abject numbness, which includes physical pain as well despite the semantic contradiction. The gist of it here is that an unusual preponderance of eye contact from afar stems from a state of profound isolation from humanity at large, with human intimacy issues as a basis, but also a justification (whether adequate or not) for why I "give women the eye" so to speak, seeing as intimate relations with woman is such an obvious potential remedy for my sufferings.

Anyone who has ventured to read this far might be wondering what actually comes from this eye contact of women at work. Firstly though, I insist that I do so with a measure of tact and an understanding of how it is received, projecting an image of one doing it in a natural way as one might if they were "checking someone out", yet with a measure of ambiguity as well, and it should also be noted that the initial impulse is somewhat unconscious, as the general trend is that it is immersed within the context of doing so to virtually anyone around me as described earlier. The context here is of great significance as well, namely that I work, ironically, in a customer experience environment with a lot of traffic with customers and employees alike always moving about where I'm expected to interact, as opposed to a cubicle in a large office building for instance, which would pose a much greater deal problems for obvious reasons.

I can say, with little uncertainty, that my behavior is met with a preponderance of "positive" feedback if you will, that is that interest is generated with unmistakable signs, the culminations of which have been, for example, over the years, having my arm being lightly pinched, my back conspicuously poked as an intimate gesture, a girl stamping her foot in frustration when I didn't pay her mind when she was standing right next to me in front of the lockers, which is admittedly seemingly cold as I certainly put out signs to her, and my ass being squeezed in celebration of a goal in a coed soccer game in a company function, for which the girl later apologized (although I don't think that was merited based on the signs I had projected and the fact that I didn't dislike it. Her physically able boyfriend hoisting me up like a ballerina after another goal, presumably as a show of competition over affections and a demonstration of where they should lie I did not appreciate though, to be sure). These physical gestures occurred as far back as middle school as well after ogling girls, such as the occasion where one sitting across from me in a group of desks shoved together (that's just how they were sometimes arranged, with groups of four or so students) conspicuously fondled my hand for more than a moment even with others present. That was an awkward one for sure, but definitely instigated by me. There is no doubt that much of this is possible because I am good looking, there is no way around that fact, and it definitely should be noted for context

In spite of all that, my behavior is obviously not right for a number of reasons, chief among them being that it is indiscriminate and even self destructive, which is demonstrated largely by the fact that when interest from a girl is generated, which is very often, but I don't have earnest affections for her, which is also very often, I tend to carry on an act of interest indefinitely (although I try to manage it with subtle signs of hesitation and uncertainty) in order to avoid coming to terms with the fact that I have deceived someone in an inappropriate way, mostly in order to avoid facing head on the immense amount of guilt that I carry related to intimacy issues. The physical symptoms of this guilt and fear, mind you, are profound. I've mentioned both numbness and grimacing, but to elaborate further on how these two things interrelate, when I try to intentionally smile, something that is advisable to do with customers, I really can't. My face is genuinely "paralyzed" to a degree that is ascribable to the ever-present fear that I suppress, so that I have to remember to squint my eyes when I smile so as not to produce a grimace that looks as though I am potentially repulsed by the person standing in front of me. You can imagine how disappointed a girl intending to reciprocate perceived affections for me is when I do that grimace, when I am in all sincerity trying to smile. Case in point, the aforementioned ass grabber afforded me an anguished "what the f-bomb" when I did just that. In her case I do regret not trying to take things somewhere, because I actually did like here quite a bit in hindsight.

Speaking of her specifically, on one occasion of rare, but genuinely constructive flirtations, we were at the register as I was to relieve her shift, or bag for her (I work at Trader Joe's, for the truly curious), I can't remember which, but her mind went blank for whatever reason and was unable to give the correct change, which happens from time to time when your mind is blank, the customer disputes or advises the correct amount, and it is no longer displayed on the register. I intervened by vehemently insisting a couple of times, but in jest, that the change was "a dollar" (even though we both knew it wasn't), implying that she could and should easily end the conflict and impending embarrassment for herself, and I managed to feign my best attempt at a smile which was a success, after which she laughed with eagerness and started fanning and then covering her face with a piece of cardboard to hide her emotions from everyone and cooing "stoooop" with the attendant flirtatious vocal inflections. During this exchange I managed to feel the good vibes for just a brief time where all the piss and vinegar of my issues drained the numbness away and the psychological and physical relief that my body has been screaming at me to feel for the better part of every waking moment of my life finally came to the fore. The next customer who witnessed the situation smiled at me with genuine enthusiasm and sympathy, but just like that, I was already back to reality and the status quo, as I afforded that customer what was likely another one of my homely grimaces, and my usual numbness was restored.

The ultimate conclusion here is that the notion of the workplace not being a proper venue for courtship is certainly misguided and horribly ironic in my case, seeing as my issue stems precisely from the fact that I don't attempt to engage in it with any conviction and confidence, but limit it to the bare minimum of eye contact, which becomes a pathological and problematic tendency that would otherwise be quite natural if limited to ordinary sincerity, without deceit and indiscriminate excess.
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread) Quote
01-04-2023 , 02:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by IAMTHISNOW
Also as regards the consistency of Peterson.

You can look at contemporary positions on current affairs, they are all monetizable algo opinions that clickbait well on social media.

It is interesting that he has been horribly strawmanning Derrida since the 90s though.

The moment someone takes that stern lecturing pointy finger tone to camera, you know they are FOS.
If true, that's bad news for Bernie Bros.
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread) Quote
01-04-2023 , 02:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ganstaman
Are you saying that rich, famous people can't be criminals?

no, Im saying that this crime doesnt make sense to me.
where is the motive? it cant be monetary. with his 8m in monthly income you can buy all that without committing a crime you know?
it can only be sex. and he even condemned criminals.

the papers say the 6 victims accuse him off robbing them of money,
the girls made up to 50k a month each and he took it allegedly and left them nothing, then of rape and putting them under housearrest. could that be a business went wrong? or greet or really whats alleged? I wouldnt rule out a set up or sour business partners, bc now they can get rich and they had nothing. maybe he wronged the wrong girl and now they smell money. or romanian mafia. idk

Last edited by washoe; 01-04-2023 at 03:05 PM.
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread) Quote
01-04-2023 , 02:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by washoe

Tate overdid it with the misogyny.
That's his selling point. Angry and alienated young men, keen on outrage and not getting much action, are a large market.
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread) Quote
01-04-2023 , 03:03 PM
Cobster tldr? If you write like this at work I guarantee eye contact is the least of the things they complain about you
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread) Quote
01-04-2023 , 03:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 57 On Red
That's his selling point. Angry and alienated young men, keen on outrage and not getting much action, are a large market.

he still overdid did bc he had his base on multiple media channels and he lost that access to these channels.
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread) Quote
01-04-2023 , 03:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by shortstacker
If true, that's bad news for Bernie Bros.

do you know emory tate, the chess player?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emory_Tate
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread) Quote
01-04-2023 , 03:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by washoe
do you know emory tate, the chess player?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emory_Tate
I've heard of him years ago. Don't know much about him.
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread) Quote
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread)
$25m Guaranteed WPM on CoinPoker
Join the action now
Daily Rewards • Splash Pots • CoinRaces
Misc off topic stuff about incels and more (taken from covid thread)

      
m