you right click copy graphic on the pic and then paste it here,
pretty easy. tell that to cupee someone please, as he is still image hosting everyt picture I think. he tought me that once.

I guess you can post it yourself now, dont know which one you wanted to post.

I can not believe I learned something from washoe, but thank you.

best case scenario from his own words on his own website:
he belongs to an organization that picks disadvantaged girls up in clubs in eastern europe, tricks them into being camgirls by lying to them/influencing them with drugs and gets them performing online pornography while taking most of their money.

several girls have previously alleged they were not allowed to leave and other things.

whole lot of FEELS in this post as some kind of evidence.. lol

again no one is demonizing men for asking a girl out 1 time and then willing accepting a rejection and moving on. we know that's not what's happening.

Why are you going out to bat for this guy?

Why does this discussion have no content relating to Tate getting soul owned by Greta Thornburg?

Do you all live in a cave?

Also as regards the consistency of Peterson.

You can look at contemporary positions on current affairs, they are all monetizable algo opinions that clickbait well on social media.

It is interesting that he has been horribly strawmanning Derrida since the 90s though.

The moment someone takes that stern lecturing pointy finger tone to camera, you know they are FOS.

No i do not.

WHat i have is years in senior management and mandatory requirement to attend many HR consulting presentations and Conferences where that was the common statement said as if fact, and i have never heard it questioned, so i have always just accepted the 'Experts' knew what they were saying with regards to most marriages being relationships that started in the workplace.

Makes sense to, if 'Most' just means the biggest cohort as compared to others and not 50+1%.

In the old hierarchy of the 4 categories i would quickly create i would say :

- work
- highschool/Uni love
- random adult meetings outside school or work
- friend or family introduction


I think today internet?app meetups probably are near the top as increasingly i meet people who are marrying who said they met 'via the internet or Apps'.

I find this Andrew Tait person very suspect in general just from the manner in which he spoke in a Piers Morgan (iirc) interview video. His tone was very single-minded, monotonous, and he even came across as some kind of vindictive extremist, emanating a strong sense of denial, emotionally speaking. So, when a serious investigation is under way where there is already strong evidence of misconduct, going to bat for him seems rather misguided to put it mildly .

I cannot figure out what point you think you making other then you feel a need to be perceived as if in conflict to me?

There is nothing wrong with citing personal experience and 'feels' on a conversation like this. This is a DISCUSSION forum and not a University citation only forum.

We can discuss personal experience, we relay our learnings and others can simply agree or disagree or say 'interesting but not my experience'.

bc the accusations are unfounded so far. maybe so you can learn something. unfounded means character assasiation/ cancelling.

maybe they have something now and then I'm screwed but so far nothing nada niente. just lies and disinformation. just like they had nothing on assange btw. he didn't rape nobody, what they did was lie about him so he shuts up and doesn't expose them.

Do you hold the same standard to every arrest thats made?

some great quotes from your hero:

Yaxley-Lennon is a full blown racist and criminal.

This is all from a guardian article.

This is easy to found. This is quotes he's made. And escape attempts he's made.

What character am I assassinating that he's not done himself?
What cancelling has been completed?

lies about assange:

(just as now with rate btw. it was all lies so far)

invented rape charges:
https://www.pressenza.com/2020/03/ho...ulian-assange/

invented hacking:
https://peoplesdispatch.org/2021/06/...ng-indictment/

Assange and Andrew Tate are different people.

Trying to equivocate them is a rhetorical dishonesty.

You are defending a serial misogynist, likely rapist, potential human trafficker, and definitive terrible dude. Don't equivocate him to Assange

he got cancelled on all channels, just not elons Twitter where he got reinstated.

he might be an idiot, but they lie about him now. that should bother you too imo.

they made assange a terrible dude too, a rapist. only thing he is no rapist. duh a lot of stuff in common here. then they let assange rot in a cell, just as what's about to happen here possibly.

Not everyone who is accused of rape is in the same boat as Assange, and believing they are, against all evidence e.g. everything I just showed you, everything he's done in the past, everything he's said, and, the attestations of the multiple people he did it to is pretty wild

ok so it should be very easy to show who he did it to.

your task now:

show who he did it to.

yeah, I'll then go do that with everyone else who's accused of rape and human trafficking.

until I've personally demonstrated they did it, its important I defend them online. you are correct.

regardless of how much the circumstantial evidence points to it. regardless of a trafficked persons right to privacy. regardless of this person already being accused of attacking women, victim blaming those being raped.

this is the person I will go out to bat for

it should be the other way around actually. innocent until proven guilt.

so stop with the wild accusations until you actually have something.

I'm not batting for this guy btw.
just pointing out some inconsistencies.

if any off these claims are true now,
screw him, he is terrible.
I can't believe how stupid he has to be to do this, if he did it.


"How Andrew Tate 'kept six women under house arrest 24/7 "like prisoners" and forced them to do online pornographic videos' "

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...se-arrest.html

He definitely blames victims of rape for whats happened
He definitely advocates beating women for making their own choices
He has stated he wants to rape people, and its easier to do it in Romania.
He has been accused of entrapping people in to making sex tapes.

The first 3 are enough for me to completely write the guy off.

The last is a public accusation he has been accused and arrested of.

It fits.

You are defending him.

What you said.

So yh, you are believing him over his accusers.
You are defending him, actively, and, dismissing his accusers.

You are going to bat for the guy who blames victims of rape for whats happened,
has stated he wants to rape people, and its easier to do it in Romania, and, advocates beating women for making their own choices.

Thats your choice.

Is what you said whilst praising him in your opening posts.

he's a terrible person regardless of the accusations being true or not. they take him from despicable, to a despicable criminal.

I am willing to cancel him and he's the exact sort who should be deplatformed