Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuepee
Definitely yes.
I have told the story of one my better friends in high school and then Uni. He was that guy who wanted a different gal every night and he got it most weekend nights, when not in a relationship. And that was because he was good looking, fearless and did not care ultimately who he took home. He would start with the best looking girl in the bar and just work his way down until he got yes. We used to joke about watching the girls faces as they went from flattered and amused to shocked at how overt and open he was because as soon as he had any traction with a gal he would just ask 'so am I going to get anything tonight'? He did not care that it turned off 9 of 10 women. His fear was wasting his time with a gal who thought this might be lining up a date and not a hook up.
He is in his 50's now and uses Tinder the same way. He is still a good looking guy with good game. And he does not even look when he swipes. He just swipes yes to everyone until the App locks him out as you only get some many hundred swipes a day. He was one goal, and that is then to reply to the gals who swiped also on him (mutual interest) and then line up night for them. Find the ones who are willing to commit to him 'getting some, on that night'.
He loves Tinder for this reason.
And there are a percent of guys who are in that mold. Some of them good looking with game.
The gals both swipe less but also clearly are only selecting for the best looking guys who swipe on them. Guys like my friend. And they are getting their time and access. And its not necessarily that the gals think they are only going for a hook up. They, in many cases, are hopeful this good looking guy (top 20% of all male profiles) is genuinely interested in them and this can become more. But they are not finding that. This top 20% (or the player group within them) is not settling down and certainly not with many of these gals they don't even find attractive.
So the take away is not that 'men swipe more', but that the women who historically were more likely to find interest from a peer male (more equal in looks) are finding interest from great looking guys with game and thus won't even swipe on and consider a more peer male. Yes women swipe less but they ALSO only swipe on the top 20% of all profiles. Imagine thinking 80% of males are not even worth engaging with? That does not make for healthy exchanges.
There is no "80/20" study, there are some vague blog-posts by people claiming to have access to internal datasets in a few dating apps, and a plethora of blogs, social media pundits and journalists which have exaggerated this flimsy and largely unverified material to the point of no credibility. Regardless, it is still completely irrelevant to the problem of a radicalized incel movement which is now fostering terrorists and mass murderers.
A lot of these posts in this thread seem to imply or hover around the idea that bad draws on the dating scene is the reason why radical parts of the incel movement is encouraging and committing terrorism. This is a pretty absurd view for several reasons.
The first is of course that bachelors or people with little success romantically haven't really organized protest movements and mass murders to avenge their misfortune in the past. That pretty much blows the "sexual frustration" argument completely out the water.
The second is that we pretty much know that the cause of the extremism: Rejection of norms, echo-chambers and radicalization by peers. Their theories about society is merely their equivalent of white supremacists yelling about Jewish conspiracies and white genocide, reality is irrelevant.