Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelhus100
WN,
We have had this discussion before, and I doubt this is the time it is going to turn you around either. But I'll say it again. The social sciences are completely corrupt. Those public health "experts" aren't scientists. They are activists. The entire field is controlled by activism, as opposed to any pursuit of rational, data based science. And I think this corruption is a big part of why we have been unable to deal with the COVID crisis in anything resembling an intelligent fashion.
When they told us international flying was safe it was activism, not science or reasoning, guiding their recommendations. When they told us it was fine to go out and mingle in public, same thing. When they told us not to wear masks in public, the same. Now they are telling us it is safe to protest in large groups. Again, it is just activism. At this point there is nothing a public health official could tell me about public health that I would trust. I would rather take the advice of a 10 year old on the street. And that is a sorry state of affairs indeed.
This is just stupid.
No sane person has said demonstrations are okay as far as the pandemic goes. Either you've over-estimated a pundit or you should do more diligent research. Dr. Fauci himself has stated that the demonstrations are bad as far as the pandemic goes.
The rest is just the completely bog standard motto of "if it disagrees with me, then the science is activism and corrupt", which at this point is is just the absolute dreariest of statements.
Sure, not all science is good science, and you can always dig up an idiot with a degree willing to say something controversial. But give an example and a refutation, instead of sounding like you're debating chem-trails on Facebook.