Oh, in case anybody still doesn't know Dr Kelly's views on Iraq, here they are, in his own words.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...tonreport.iraq
You'll notice they are very similar to Tony Blair's views, as expressed in his memoir A Journey -- particularly in relation to the UNSC, and Saddam's vote-buying from the French, Germans, Russians and Chinese, and the likelihood that sanctions would soon break down. That'll be because Kelly, an MI6 asset, was partly responsible for the briefings that the Prime Minister received.
We now know, of course, that in some respects MI6 was lying to No.10. In particular, they knew that the two Iraqi defectors in Germany, who told those stories about 'mobile labs' and so on, were fantasists and liars, because the German BND interrogators said so -- yet MI6 told No.10 those two men were reliable. Even after MI6 internal documents recognised as fact that the two men were liars, they still didn't tell No.10 this.
Kelly, as an MI6 asset, then got caught out in a buck-passing operation to put the blame on No.10, using Kelly as the cut-out to brief journalists. As it was deniable, he had no recourse once caught and he was just hung out to dry.
Although the Chilcot report contains at least some of the essential information, its grandstanding headline-grabbing conclusions, the only bits anyone took notice of, are at odds with much of that information. I'm not sure the Chilcot report would have been quite that bad if Sir Martin Gilbert, one of the most distinguished members of the panel, had not died so prematurely.