Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register

04-04-2011 , 07:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingLeonidas
Some people just feel they are superior and try to belittle others. That's the strategy of folks with very low self-esteem. They need to leave their mom's basement and get a life.
Yeah, you aren't trying to belittle anyone with that comment.

You're the first person I'm putting on ignore on 2p2 as your idiotic posts tilt me.

Good luck getting that self esteem of yours up
Quote
04-04-2011 , 08:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeflonDawg
No, that is not what I said. Making a profit does not mean you are beating the game.

If you walk away from the table down $100, then you lost. You did not beat the game (the rake and the players). Getting $101 in bonus and/or rakeback does not change this fact.

There are plenty of players who make significant amounts of money every year playing poker online, but are actually losing and/or breakeven players. You could lose $95,000 in the process of getting 1 million VPPs this year and still come out with $5k+ profit. That doesn't mean you beat the rake and the competition for $5k+...

Not that any of this matters...a pound of rakeback $s is worth the same as a pound of donkIstackedatthetable $s
fwiw, I agree with this because the description of a game being "beatable" or not typically means "can I walk away from the table with more money than I showed up with?"

When someone posts a thread to the tune of "this cruise ship has a 15% uncapped rake, is this game beatable?" The answer given is simply "no." No one says, "depends, will they comp you a Mercedes?"

Really though, it's just semantics. Since neither side can agree on a common definition of the word "beatable" everything else is moot. Of course both sides will disagree on everything, they're talking about different things.
Quote
04-04-2011 , 08:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeflonDawg
No, that is not what I said. Making a profit does not mean you are beating the game.

If you walk away from the table down $100, then you lost. You did not beat the game (the rake and the players). Getting $101 in bonus and/or rakeback does not change this fact.

There are plenty of players who make significant amounts of money every year playing poker online, but are actually losing and/or breakeven players. You could lose $95,000 in the process of getting 1 million VPPs this year and still come out with $5k+ profit. That doesn't mean you beat the rake and the competition for $5k+...

Not that any of this matters...a pound of rakeback $s is worth the same as a pound of donkIstackedatthetable $s
after a silly firsrt couple paragraphs, you final sentence finally gets it right. When you go to put your check in the bank do they ask if it is poker profit or fpp profit. nope, both buy a steak dinner and some stock.
Quote
04-04-2011 , 08:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy
Yeah, you aren't trying to belittle anyone with that comment.

You're the first person I'm putting on ignore on 2p2 as your idiotic posts tilt me.

Good luck getting that self esteem of yours up
^ epic fail.
Quote
04-04-2011 , 09:40 PM
So I think I learned itt that WR>hourly and peer respect>money?!
Quote
04-04-2011 , 09:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by starvingwriter82
fwiw, I agree with this because the description of a game being "beatable" or not typically means "can I walk away from the table with more money than I showed up with?"

When someone posts a thread to the tune of "this cruise ship has a 15% uncapped rake, is this game beatable?" The answer given is simply "no." No one says, "depends, will they comp you a Mercedes?"

Really though, it's just semantics. Since neither side can agree on a common definition of the word "beatable" everything else is moot. Of course both sides will disagree on everything, they're talking about different things.
Yeah, I alluded to that in the last part of my post. I'm just gonna give up now, because this guy...

Quote:
Originally Posted by KingLeonidas
after a silly firsrt couple paragraphs, you final sentence finally gets it right. When you go to put your check in the bank do they ask if it is poker profit or fpp profit. nope, both buy a steak dinner and some stock.
Is starting to sound like this guy.
Quote
04-04-2011 , 11:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1p0kerboy
So I think I learned itt that WR>hourly and peer respect>money?!
LOL...
Quote
04-04-2011 , 11:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeflonDawg
Yeah, I alluded to that in the last part of my post. I'm just gonna give up now, because this guy...



Is starting to sound like this guy.
That is ridiculous. But, ad hominem attacks work for you i guess. peace.
Quote
04-04-2011 , 11:42 PM
Quote:
This message is hidden because KingLeonidas is on your ignore list.
This is fantastic!
Quote
04-05-2011 , 12:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingLeonidas
That is ridiculous. But, ad hominem attacks work for you i guess. peace.
It's not an ad hominem. It's a thread of another guy who is too dense to understand a message other posters are trying to convey to him. I'm not going to try to explain my premise to you again, because then I'd have to call starvingwriter82 nostradamuswriter82.
Quote
04-05-2011 , 01:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeflonDawg
It's not an ad hominem. It's a thread of another guy who is too dense to understand a message other posters are trying to convey to him. I'm not going to try to explain my premise to you again, because then I'd have to call starvingwriter82 nostradamuswriter82.
You have made no explanation. You've just made aspersions. Fine, it's all you got. I understand. I have had an intelligent discussion with hurt, and we have politely disagreed. Why is that over your head?
Quote
04-05-2011 , 03:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeflonDawg
Yeah, I alluded to that in the last part of my post. I'm just gonna give up now, because this guy...



Is starting to sound like this guy.
Did you really read that whole thread? You are my hero man... I read like three pages of it and I was so tilted I wanted to run a bunny over with a lawnmower.

Anyone that reads that thread (let alone comments) has either zero brains, or balls of steel. I couldn't hack it.
Quote
04-05-2011 , 10:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingLeonidas
You have made no explanation. You've just made aspersions. Fine, it's all you got. I understand. I have had an intelligent discussion with hurt, and we have politely disagreed. Why is that over your head?
Nothing is going over my head. Your arrogance is what's letting the crux of the argument go over yours. It wasn't even a big deal, just a minor quibble in the grand scheme of things. Kind of like when someone holds KK on a JQK flop and thinks he flopped trips, when we all know that isn't trips, it's a set. Right now, you're the guy telling me and other posters we're wrong and trying to tell us you flopped trips.
Quote
04-05-2011 , 10:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by starvingwriter82
Did you really read that whole thread? You are my hero man... I read like three pages of it and I was so tilted I wanted to run a bunny over with a lawnmower.

Anyone that reads that thread (let alone comments) has either zero brains, or balls of steel. I couldn't hack it.
Or torn ligaments in his ankle.
Quote
04-05-2011 , 11:25 PM
Do the 4 tablers honestly think that the 24 table sne guys would have the same winrate if they only played 4 tables? ;x
Quote
04-06-2011 , 05:24 PM
^^^ Maybe, but they're stacking fish at only 4 tables instead of 24. More to go around.
Quote

      
m