I received a response and I don't even have an account at Pacific, so maybe something will happen. Here's my recent exchange:
-----Original Message-----
From: Pacific Poker (Support) [mailto:support@pacificpoker.com]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: [N] Outrage!!!! (KMM29279460I2229L0KM)
Dear Madam/Sir,
Thank you for your feedback.
Our goal has always been to provide our members with the best service
and the best product in the Gaming industry and this is why we value on
our members' feedback highly.
Your comments have been forwarded to the relevant department and I would
like to thank you again for taking the time to share them with us.
We assure you that the matter you are referring to is being addressed
with the individual member and I?m sure you also understand that we have
a strict privacy policy in place and are therefore unable to inform you
of the outcome of this issue.
If you require any further assistance, please feel free to contact us -
we are here for you 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
Kind regards,
Pacific Poker
Member Support Department
support@pacificpoker.com
www.888.com[/COLOR][/I]
Thank you for the follow up.
While I understand and respect your privacy policy, I think you could inform me of a change in your user agreement regarding the dormant account fees should that ever occur.
I strongly feel this rule should be modified in the user agreement to something more reasonable. I can understand closing out hundreds of accounts that have been dormant for years with balances of say $50.00 or less. However, charging a 10% admin fee is way too high and completely unfair given that a person who has a balance of $50 would only pay $5.00 whereas a person with $5,000 in their account would have to pay $500 per month. I simply cannot believe that the administration required to manage the account with $5,000 is more time consuming than the account with $50. Plus in both cases you have the benefit of earning interest on the money in these accounts
Given that you earn money from players who play poker on your site, I would think you would want to enable people to play on your site in any way possible. Absorbing the account balance with admin fees not only takes away from the players ability to play, it keeps your site from earning rake from their play. How this could ever be a positive business policy is beyond me.
I would also kindly suggest that your system send out auto emails warning players that their balance is in danger of being subject to admin fees if they don’t log in and play or cash out their balance. This would be a win-win for all parties because the player will either play poker and earn rake for your site or close his account and reduce your administration fees.
Again thank you for your response and I hope you implement some of these recommendations.
Regards,
Jeff F