Have you forgotten to take your medication today?

"Dammit Beavis, You're gonna' make us look stupid"

-Butt Head

I kind of hope they rigg it because that would be funny in a dark comedy kind of way.

Rigged golf.. he maybe onto something

Pikachoo, I will sponsor an effort for you to expose this on National TV, which will not only make you famous but a Hero.

I will get you a ticket to the Masters and arrange for your travel there.

I will have an unidentified asset leave a shovel for you at the 11th green...

OK send $50,000 via paypal and I will leave tonight for GA. can be there by tee off tomorrow. PM me for paypal email.

If your going to be a Merc. for hire. I'll pay pal you 50k to fly to Nashville and dig up the fake body in Elvis Presley's plot at Graceland. We'll send the DNA to my contacts and make millions...

LOL @ Pikachu making the same argument for golf being rigged, as the rigtards make for poker being rigged, and the rigtards are calling him crazy. Oh, the irony.

And you're following up by saying that rigging Golf the Pikachoo way, is just as plausible as rigging online poker? LoL @ you too...

You sound just like a Rigtard, interesting....

Um...miss the point much?

When the cannon balls blow the mosquitoes fly away, wait until the next months.

The RNG can never send balls without being detected? I truly doubt that. Its not irony that cars are teard down these days!

I expected spade to say, this realdeal stuff is like any other RNG, it cant be manipulated without being detected.

If they're actually banking dealt hands, why would you expect spade to say that?

I want you to think on this for a while if you need to...

What he said doesn't contradict that.

Well, under the system Spade set out it would be pretty darn hard to detect, no?

Because basically there is no difference between the realdeal and the RNG, so if it can be done in the realdeal it can be obviously done with the RNG . They can just store the results of RNG and choose after that wich cards they will deal and when.

Interesting is that few posts ago I was talking exactly about that, which I called time manipulation. The deal is random, but the time when the cards are distributed is manipulated.

they can't possibly be storing every possible combination of 52 cards. that's idiotic.

no they can't. this is nonsense.

Right, in the case of RNG there is no sense in storing the deal. All that is needed is to have a software that chooses wich card will be dealt yet not going out of the limits of randomness. Just like spade suggests it can be done in the realdeal stuff.

Well, it might be technically possible, they just aren't doing it. They'd have to be dealing out full hands in advance then picking when to use them. The key to not being detected I presume is that they would have to use every singl. If they discard the deals they don't like it will be as detectable as any other ploy. But if they are banking every deal, then just distributing them as they wish, it would be again much harder to detect.

I'm not the stats guy here, so I'll defer to them if this is all bunk.

Again, I'll defer to the stats guys, but I'd think they'd have to mimic RD's proposed practice of banking hands for this really to work.

Tk!!!

Good to see you back.

We've missed you.

Ah!

You begin to see the power of the dark side.

No one with even a gramme of intelligence will believe this is anything other than a level.

You're an Eejit.

A Stoopid,stoopid eejit.

It would not be any harder or easier to detect than any other manipulation of the deal, whether the deck is generated by realdeal methods or regular RNG methods. Choosing a preshuffled deck non-randomly from a set of decks, affects the distribution of cards received by every player. My point was that the realdeal method doesn't make it harder for the site to manipulate things than the methods used by other sites. And like other sites, the output is the only thing that matters. Assuming they run it honestly, that output isn't going to be any different than other sites, and after a short time the rigged theories will be as common there as anywhere else. Those theories are never rooted in how a site could do it (that just follows as an attempt to justify the theory). They stem from false perceptions as to what people think random output should look like.