You really are too animal stupid to realise that whether or not I play on line poker is irrelevant to this discussion.

I expect people to judge my arguments on the basis of the logic contained within them not how much I win at poker.

It's rigged in my favour obv

Your site promoting job might be hanging on a thread with that terrible response.
Its obvious you dont play, so why devote your life to defending rigged OLP?
If theres one thing I hate more than life wrecking scams like slot machines, online blackjack, casinos, and rigged online poker, its the scum that promote it.

[QUOTE=SwoopAE;28519080]It's rigged in my favour obv[/QUOTE

Enjoy while you can, its only temporary. 100% guaranteed.

I completely agree. These site promoter shills talk about their "pokertacker hand histories" and "empirical data" but I know that the real proof of an unfair deal can be observed by watching a few hands. I mean I lost with AA all in preflop v. KK. Multiple times!!!

I will never use a HUD because I know that they were invented by the rigged sites and site promoting shills to make the sheeple believe that the games are fair. It is a global conspiracy to make me lose at poker and make me believe that I lose because I am an inferior player, when I know I am the best player of all time. I just know in my heart that I am chock full of natural talent at the game and have therefore not studied or read books about it, which would undermine my genetically superior ability. My continued losses could obviously never be explained by anything but an unfair deal.

You are a crusader for the good of poker players everywhere; don't let the shills tell you otherwise. By the way, in your dissertation exposing the sickeningly unfair deal which caused me (and many other geniuses) to lose with aces, could you also investigate Norton anti-virus, Pokertracker, Comcast Internet, and my bitchy girlfriend? I believe that they are also in on the conspiracy to make me (and other geniuses like me) lose.

Thanks in advance. You are doing good work, sir.

^^^ The most amusing thing is that blatantly******ed will take this at face value.

Hi.

You ignored my reply to you again.

Standard riggie technique.

If anyone makes a reply that answers their question or contradicts their claim they either:

1) Scream "Shill!"

2) Ask how much you play on line

3) Ask why you spend so much time defending OLP.

4) Ignore you and repeat the claim or question a few days later.

Only on randomstars can you be dealt face-rag all night long and then run kings into aces blind-on-blind.

What a farce lol.

He wont because he works for them....He will completely avoid this!

Busted.

How are you still too stupid to quote properly? It is one button. WTF is wrong with you?

I've now tested Bodog using the same test that has been run on Stars, Party, Entraction, Merge & Ongame. Here is a brief description of the test. Much more detail, full results and copies of data-sets used etc can be seen here.

Game: 6-max cash tables at 5c/10c no-limit
Dataset: 1.1 million hands from PTR
Sample: Heads-up pre-flop all-ins

Analysis 1, For all-hands:
hand seen from view of pre-flop caller (filtered for caller)
calculate expected number hands won
count actual number hands won
compare actual deviation to standard deviation

Analysis 2:
Assumptions - Winning players will, more often than not, be ahead in a pre-flop all-in. Losing players will, more often than not, be behind in a pre-flop all-in.
Separate hands into equity bands 50-100% (ahead hands) and 0-50% (behind hands).
Repeat Analysis 1 for both these sub-sets

Analysis 3: Repeat for dominated and dominating hands.

Here's a pre-emptive strike especially for this thread:

For those thinking that I've tampered with the data/results... I've made the PT report downloadable so that you can use it on your own hand histories and therefore be sure that no tampering has taken place!

But will it blend?

For wutangpoker:
I have a great vacation idea for you, seeing its the long weekend.
Might I suggest a long walk off a short cliff?

Yea, already knew that. Was looking for the response, and got the expected.

OK!

Laughing assassin, I will be depositing in just a second!
You have me convinced!

Good grief!

Blatantly******ed's brain has just kicked it.

Surely just a temporary glitch and his normal inane utterances will resume shortly.

Me too! After reading the full results and data-set, I can't wait to get some money on that site.

Goody gumdrops.

Face-rag was the theme on randomstars the other night, I think tonight's theme is low off-suited connectors - which pretty much sucks.

It's gonna be really great to play on Bodog, where, according to the "full results and copies of the data-sets", they deal a straight game.

Bring it on!

Do you really think that this will have even the slightest impact on those that need to believe that poker is rigged?

You may as well send this information to a mental institution; on second thought that would just be a duplication of services.

Jump up and put it in the basket chief.

Ok, we now know that the sites are not so stupid to rig all in hands. However, how do we know that they do not rig the deal in other hands? We don't. And we don't have the evidence or data to test whether or not they do because we don't have all the hole cards for all hands.

Fly over the cookoo's nest? Watta great movie

Yet there are many that disagree, who have as much as evidence for their theories as you do

We know there are known knowns: there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns: that is to say we know there are things we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns — the ones we don't know we don't know.

So in conclusion, what exactly are the known unknowns to you, which are unknown unknowns to everybody else.