Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
PokerStars MTT Thread PokerStars MTT Thread

06-09-2016 , 04:32 AM
Still **** all for O8 mtts outside of peak hours and you still haven't brought back the weekend O8s
#WeWerePoker
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
06-09-2016 , 08:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erebgil_bg
Friday 3-max (Zoom or no) would be more popular than the current Friday Zoom
Any other thoughts on this? I quite like Fast Friday. Zoom is a format that doesn't work if it is peppered in the regular schedule, but seems to do well when it has a focused offering like this.

Quote:
Originally Posted by yeahm8
Got some free time today, had a look to see what micro reg speeds I can play and I find TWO reg speeds over a 7 HOUR period...

I am unable reproduce this. Are you sure you didn't have some filters enabled?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oink
Regarding Omanias and and PKO's

I think its at least worth a try to change some of the Omanias to PKOs or have some Omaha Bounty Builders or whatever.

Some of the more popular Omaha tours in the main schedule are the Sunday 82 PKOs (NLO8 & PLO), but also the daily 82 NLO8 PKO Hyper. (I believe the only daily Omaha tour that creates a bigger pool than this is the 55 PLO Omania).

Just looking at the number of entries and prizepools created I think its fair to say that PKOs are in higher demand than freezeouts, n-stacks or re-entries. As an example look at the daily $27 NLO8 starting at 16:05 CET and then the daily $27 NLO8 PKO about ½ hour later. The former is highlighted and has sats running for it and yet the latter consistently gets similar or higher # entries. But in general the $11-$27 PKOs attract the highest number of entries on the daily schedule.

Not saying all the Omanias should be changed to PKO (tho that would be fine with me), but imho its worth it, to at least consider if freeze outs is the way to go.
I agree with much of this, but I do not consider re-entry to be a bad option for Omania. It allows a variable buy-in to a smaller audience of unique players who are passionate about these games.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BoxcarHobo
Just wanted to say thanks for devoting some attention to the omaha MTT schedule. It seems pretty clear that the n-stack isn't ideal for them, so I think if you made the Omania tagged tourneys as freezouts they would perform solidly and then added the Bounty Builder tag to some of the others they would get really big. Recs seem to be drawn to the Bounty Builder tag more than any other tournaments so getting them into some omaha mtt's would likely build the game.

It looks like there's absolutely no reason to make any plo hi tourney full ring, but making one afternoon and one morning omania full ring o8 freezout would appease the sizable (though I'm not one of them) group of regs who want some full ring 08. If they were $27s then the lower buyin players would probably fill up some satties to it as well.
We still haven't reached a decision on Omania, but I do thank everyone for providing their input. I'm not incredibly hot on the idea of all Omania tournaments becoming "Omania Bounty Builders", but pairing the brands in some minor way could provide a lot of value to Omania. We'll think a bit more on it.

As far as full ring O8 tournaments go, we'll likely have a couple additions once Euros are over. I'll look at the old schedule and see what was successful and what wasn't.

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidv1213
the "reg speed" ones go to 8/10/12 min levels later in the structure, they play at pretty much an ideal stack depth/tourney length to be used in a lot of satellites. the level times later make a huge difference and imo its a very well balanced structure
I've changed the early levels of these satellites to 6 minutes instead of 5. No more confusion!

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTXR1
Personally I like 3-Stack. Please don't make them another PKO. There are enough PKO in the schedule already.
But why do all tourneys have to be gimmicky anyways. What's wrong with vanilla?



When you are speaking of 'Omaha' tourneys would you please specify whether you mean PLO or O8 because those games are fundamentally different.

It's mostly O8 players who are complaining about the entire schedule being 6-max now. The reference that CG is played 6-max doesn't justify the switch. Holdem CG is also mostly played 6-max, but you wouldn't turn the entire HE schedule into 6-max overnight, would you? O8 was about 75% FR, turning it into 100% 6-max overnight is very unthoughtful.

Edit: I do like both 6-max and Full Ring for different reasons. I'm not a fan of 9-max though. I wish all Full Ring was made 8-max. But removing Full Ring entirely is very bad. It's always bad to remove an option, whether it's popular or not.
All fair points. To answer the bolded, Omania tournaments were vanilla before and they were not successful. They may perform better as re-entry which is "close" to vanilla, but it is good for all if more players are enticed to join the games. If it takes a gimmick to do that, so be it IMO.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelvin Kerber
Luke, does the Super Sized get to the timebank faster than reg speed tournaments? everytime i have to think a bit there i feel i have to hurry
Nope, same as all the others. Too many tables?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelvin Kerber
turn 320 6max red on sundays, call it Sunday 6max with 5k stack with 50k gtd for start push 1h and i think its gonna be a success
This is something we can consider after the summer. Adding high stakes majors isn't on the table at the moment.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTXR1
Now that's a start!

What really is frustrating is the lack of response. Since the start of the new schedule I have made at least 10 posts about mixed games but not a single one of them has been addressed. It's like tapping in the dark as to understand what made you do these changes and whether you are willing to listen to us.

I've been looking at the new mixed games schedules from different perspectives (Filtered, Tourney->Special, Events->'MTT schedule'->Majors|'Daily Specials'. It appears - and again we can only speculate - that you intended to unclutter the special tab and therefore have removed both 'Daily' and 'Weekly' tournaments. I see you mentioned the word 'special' in recent posts and it seems to you these tournaments were not very special. They certainly aren't in overall comparison, but for mixed games players those Weekly tournaments are special, something like their Sunday Millions.

Now I'm not sure if there is a chance to bring back the tourneys under their former label. But as you continue to run 'Omania', alternatively you could at least add the former O8 games to that umbrella. In particular:

Daily 15:30 (ET) $27 Omania FLO8, $1.5K Gtd

Sa 13:30 (ET) $215 Omania Weekly-H PLO8, $10K Gtd
Sa 13:30 (ET) $82 Omania Weekly-L PLO8, $8K Gtd

Su 13:00 (ET) $215 Omania Weekly-H NLO8, $12K Gtd
Su 13:00 (ET) $82 Omania Weekly-L NLO8, $10K Gtd

Su 14:30 (ET) $530 Omania Weekly-H FLO8, $15K Gtd
Su 14:30 (ET) $82 Omania Weekly-L FLO8, $4K Gtd

NEW: Su 16:30 (ET) $215 Sunday NLO8 Hyper [6-max], $30K Gtd
Except for the Hyper, I do suggest to make them 8-max (formerly 9-max). If you for some reason don't like the -H/-L approach please bring back at least the $215 versions. I opted for a higher buy-in for the FLO8 to target both high stakes MTT and CG players.

HORSE and 8-Game are still well represented (albeit maxed out at $82) but their individual games Stud(8), Razz, 2-7 need a comeback too. Also please revive the 'Astronomer Freerolls' to introduce new players to these games.
I very much appreciate all the suggestions - they do not go unnoticed. Since we've had a lot of discussion about Omania, I should say that my current preference is to have Omania majors. This would result in the Monday/Wednesday/Friday $320 Omahas and potentially the Sunday Grand being brought under the Omania umbrella. I think this would provide the most flexibility with the offering in terms of adding and removing tournaments while simultaneously giving them a higher profile. Any thoughts?

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_bridler
Would like to see a timebomb major on sundays
We used to have the Saturday Countdown, but its popularity declined to the point that it was removed from the schedule. Longer time tournaments are the least popular in the current offering.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wanted_Doni
Maybe wrong place to write this but anyway; What do you guys think about this suggestion:

In progressive knockouts, make them "normal knockouts" WHEN you reach the final table.
- That means you get players FULL bounty on you account when busting them on a final table.

1. Would enhance the feeling of being in the final table, more enjoyable since bounties are bigger.
2. Not so top-heavy since second and first place usually are the ones that busts people out.

What do you think?
Is there any downsides to this suggestion really???
I always appreciate innovative thinking, but this is the sort of development that would need an incredibly high upside as it fundamentally alters the logic in our system. Much of the complaints about PKO payouts can be mitigated using pay tables.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thegamewillendsoon
Yes ok. But today it had 12 players in the money instead of 11. Why is that? If they take 17 instead of 18 why would they pay 12 players when 2 tables are paid, instead of 11?
Do you have a tournament ID by chance?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FT37
Thanks for adding a mini version of the pacific rim special.
You're welcome! Has done well so far.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thegamewillendsoon
Why do some bigs have different payouts already? I see some bigs with a mincash over 2 times the buyin, paying only 12% of the players, and others paying 15% or more with a much lower mincash. What am I not getting here?



Every pay table has a range. For instance, if the range was from 2 players to 20,000 and only 1 player was paid, it could range from 50% of players paid to a fraction of a percent. There is a bit more variance in the % of players paid in tournaments with smaller fields.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChanY
It is such a sick money grab to make all sats hypers, raise theyr rake big time and then make them 1r1a conviently enough when they started raking rebuys. wtf? There used to be atleast a couple of turbo sats to all mtts but now all of them are gone for hyper turbo deep ones which is a format that SUCKS.
1R1A deep hyper-turbo sats originated in one of the COOPs some time ago and have proven to be extremely popular.

Quote:
Originally Posted by H0LDiT
On a Sunday only, you run a bunch of 200fpp 2r1a to the Mill.

Why not have them on during the week too?

If you don't think they will generate enough seats change them 500fpp



Why don't you start adding Sunday Million tickets to your daily tourneys, award FT or top 3/4 places a ticket.

Winamax has done that religiously for over a year for their weekly 150e and it works really well
With regards to the bolded, it actually becomes a possibility as of today. When Bounty Builders were launched, they were hybridized, but the downside was that they were considered satellites even though only a tiny % of the prize pool was given away as tickets. With the server restart, we should no longer have the filtering problem. We'll be testing this as soon as possible.

Quote:
Originally Posted by anuj22
These needs to be addressed too:

1) Hypers being all 6 max

While I agree they play well as 6 max but at the same time I feel not every hypers have to be 6 max. Any chance you will be adding 8 max or 9 max hypers? You can also change some of the Progressive KO hypers to 8 max/9 max

2) Lack of $3.30-$7.50 Hypers between 07:35-11:35 ET slot

In the old schedule there used to be 5 $5 buy in hypers between 07:35 - 11:35 slot but now we have NONE at that slot. What we have now is either they are very low buy ins or the buy ins are way too high. Can you have a look at their buy ins? Would like if you add couple of $5 buy in hypers at that slot. Note - there used to be 17 $5.10 hypers in the old schedule but we have now only 5 $5 buy in hypers.

3) Bigger/Hotter versions on Sundays?

Any chance bigger/hotter versions will be back? I mean you don't have to increase their time level to 12 mins or anything like that, just give them scoop like structures on Sundays and name them Bigger/Hotter. Some of the bigger/hotter gtds are almost double on Sundays but people need to know about it.

4) Timebomb rake too high- Dont think its fair to charge them 10% rake. They play as hyper turbos. Just because their time levels are of 5 mins doesn't mean they are turbos.

And yeah +1 to a timebomb major. 10,000 stack with 7 mins levels and have it run for 150-180 mins <3
Thanks for the list. I'm still unsure whether or not we'll change the hyper-turbos and would happily accept more feedback. I'm of the opinion that 6-max provides a much better player experience.

I've made a note to look at the time slots you provided that are missing some micro/low hypers.

I'll give the suggestion regarding the Bigger/Hotter some thought, but it is unlikely this change would be made before summer is over.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ORLY???
Both .eu and .fr crashed for me today, .eu crashed sunday too.
I've passed on the complaints about client crashes.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
06-09-2016 , 08:30 AM
Your job has gotten surprisingly easier recently.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
06-09-2016 , 08:38 AM
Lol. Don't respond till thread is dead. Then address the other points



Lol? He asked you to make the 320 Sunday 6max a nice brand and title since it already exists And you say we aren't adding any HS trnys. He only wanted you to make it appealing to play lol.



ALso plz don't hybridize trnys and take away even more
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
06-09-2016 , 09:09 AM
why is so hard to name them biggers hotters on sundays? do it and they will grown by itself. lol why on the earth it was has to be changed at the first place??!! this is ridicilous. wtf is going on here??
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
06-09-2016 , 09:12 AM
i think you should discuss some things with Bryen, he was doing a great job with mtts before
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
06-09-2016 , 09:28 AM
Bryan, Mr. December 2013 was doing a good job?

Nah, Bryan always gave his heart to the COOPs and the main schedule was like an atrophied step child. I think part of the issue was he was supposed to control so much that only some made it onto his plate.

The problem isn't any one person. Amaya bought the company in 2014 and we've just trying to hang on for dear life ever since.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
06-09-2016 , 09:31 AM
idd if you are already adjusting some of the bigs/hots gtds for sundays seems like a no brainer to give them the bigger/hotter label and make it more appealing for people to reg... and as countless people said you shouldnt have changed something that was working good.

Another possible idea that might work is to adjust, even if slightly, the gtds on the higher buy ins on tuesday and thursday and call something like "Big 109 - tuesday/thursday edition"
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
06-09-2016 , 09:31 AM


just sayin
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
06-09-2016 , 09:49 AM
you should also look at the ****ing data, how smaller those bigs hots on sundays since its not called the biggers the hotters. and its just because of the name. wake up! wtf

its nothing to do with the summer lol wtf, and should not wait till summer is over. wtf. it was called biggers hotters since years. and it worked fine. WTF?


you know what, dont even increase the GTD just call them bigger hotters on sundays, it will grow this way too. ffs

Last edited by playr; 06-09-2016 at 09:58 AM. Reason: unbeliavable
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
06-09-2016 , 10:04 AM
the new pay-tables is really bad in the small field tourneys, I played one yesterday and 27/135 got paid. no way more than 15 (maybe maybe 18) should get paid. amaya basically paid out 17 buyins that could have sweetened the top prices (first got ~29bi)

imo no less than 8% should get paid in a mtt and no more than 12%. I've always played a lot in the summer but this year Im not sure if its worth it with the new payouts.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
06-09-2016 , 10:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by playr
why is so hard to name them biggers hotters on sundays? do it and they will grown by itself. lol why on the earth it was has to be changed at the first place??!! this is ridicilous. wtf is going on here??
.

Last edited by LOLCh1pPorn; 06-09-2016 at 10:08 AM. Reason: !!!
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
06-09-2016 , 10:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1mtm91
To employ footballers and have no euro promo is a waste of resources too!!
Seppuku!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by blakkman08


just sayin
Stud Hi games must be pretty dead nowadays, lol

Last edited by Contemplater; 06-09-2016 at 10:27 AM.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
06-09-2016 , 10:33 AM
Luke, why dont you say your hands are tied with regards to the payout structure? That there is nothing you can or will do. That the changes are fixed, and the payouts are only being altered in a more top heavy way when the deepest region of hell freezes over?

Then at least most of us can stop following this now ridiculous thread, and move our volume to another site. Or is that the reason?
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
06-09-2016 , 10:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerStars Luke

Do you have a tournament ID by chance?

PokerStars Tournament #1577526631, Pot Limit Omaha Hi/Lo
Buy-In: $15.00/$1.50 USD
108 players
Total Prize Pool: $1620.00 USD
Tournament started 2016/06/01 12:05:00 CET [2016/06/01 6:05:00 ET]

Also, you stated vanilla omanias aren't successful. I played this specific omania a few times a week from the start of the omania concept. It is true the guarantee dropped since the beginning (iirc from 5K to 2.5K), but since the new schedule the prizepool has been destroyed (1K guaranteed).
I can show you at random some of the pizepools of the ones I played in 2016. Iirc the guarantee was 3K or 2.5K
Day/month/year (based on OPR)
4/1/2016: 3,420
8/1/2016:3,450
11/1/2016: 3,240
18/1/2016: 3,000
25/1/2016: 3,165
1/2/2016: 3,585
9/2/2016: 3,540
22/2/2016: 3,090
3/3/2016: 3,180
9/3/2016: 2,880
11/3/2016: 2,940
16/3/2016: 2,700
22/3/2016: 3,090
4/4/2016: 2,970
13/4/2016: 2,730
16/4/2016:3,555
23/4/2016 : 3,600
25/4/2016: 2,640
26/4/2016: 2,835

I played a lot less in May but here the numbers started to drop fast. Guarantee lowered to 1.5K and 1K!

18/5/2016: 1,800
23/5/2016: 2,145
26/5/2016:1,965
1/6/2016: 1,620
7/6/2016: 1,890

My point is someting in the new schedule has made the popularity drop even faster. But what? The structure did not change, the timezone did not change and you get 50% more chips to start with (the 3-stack) so that can't be it. I believe it is the lack of satellites. There used to be 8 or 9 for this MTT and a lot of people were grinding them. Now you only have 2 sats?. I really think you should restore the old satts (0,88 rebuys and 1,65 rebuys). Its a rakefest for Amaya and more people will be able to play in the omanias, restoring the prizepool to 2K -2.5K.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
06-09-2016 , 10:56 AM
Just totally ignores the million and the payouts hilarious but about what was expected.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelvin Kerber
Luke, does the Super Sized get to the timebank faster than reg speed tournaments? everytime i have to think a bit there i feel i have to hurry
Since the New "improved" schedule every tournament gets to the timebank faster you're totally right i have never felt so rushed even playing 6 tables just another little attack on thinking players.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
06-09-2016 , 01:23 PM
Next Sunday the Storm has a whopping 200k prizepool left! You could ask yourself how much longer they keep decreasing the prizepools!! Maybe someday the guaranteed will be 1$.
I can not believe we are that far away from the good days when this tourney easily made it passed the 300k marker!!! last week the prizepool was easily 250k.
I do not get why they don't see that this decreasing of prizepools does not attract players and it will only create a domino effect, people do not play anymore, stars decreases guaranteed a little, more people do not like it anymore,... and so on.

Any comments Chris Moorman1 signing at 888???
Seems they are getting ready for battle!?
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
06-09-2016 , 02:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FiveTenss

Any comments Chris Moorman1 signing at 888???
Seems they are getting ready for battle!?


they cant even comment micromilions
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
06-09-2016 , 07:30 PM
Hello,

Could you possibly add another tournament like $16.50 deepstack PKO?

Luke, If you could add $5r 2x or something on sundays with decent gurantee that will attract ton of recreational players and regs.

Thanks.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
06-09-2016 , 10:05 PM
Thanks again for addressing my lengthy posts about the payouts Luke. Maybe you will answer questions on a different topic?

Can we get some of the games that were available on Full Tilt back because as it stands the merge has simply removed these popular games from the online arena. Good move removing the amount of rake you get Amaya. Medium sized vanilla or semi-vanilla games will again fill the void for the Full Tilt player base, Regs semi starting or semi ending their sessions and Recreational player who want "to give it another go" after busting a 10-hour game before reaching the money or whatever; my point is that the player pool is not completely polarized towards either really short sessions with SNGS or massive sessions with the Majors. In particular i think some of the daily "specials" from Full Tilt should go down well. The One Up tourney did well, unless the gtd was slashed. There were also a few more Turbo games to play 10pm-2am euro time

And what about the FTOPS / mini FTOPS would they be returning in some form?
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
06-10-2016 , 12:12 AM
Sorry about a very specific question but I'm very curious to understand the logic here, this must be a mistake.

00:30 ET $55 6max PKO started at a 5k gtd in the new schedule. One week later it was bumped to 7.5k, then dropped to 6k and finally 5k. I don't recall it ever overlaying but whatever, I might be wrong.

However, yesterday it had the old 7.5k gtd, a nice surprise. Final prizepool was 8.7k. Today, the gtd is 5k again. May you let me know why?
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
06-10-2016 , 12:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pietro_MK
Sorry about a very specific question but I'm very curious to understand the logic here, this must be a mistake.

00:30 ET $55 6max PKO started at a 5k gtd in the new schedule. One week later it was bumped to 7.5k, then dropped to 6k and finally 5k. I don't recall it ever overlaying but whatever, I might be wrong.

However, yesterday it had the old 7.5k gtd, a nice surprise. Final prizepool was 8.7k. Today, the gtd is 5k again. May you let me know why?
Thursday ain't the same as Wednesday player pool wise.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
06-10-2016 , 02:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FiveTenss
Next Sunday the Storm has a whopping 200k prizepool left! You could ask yourself how much longer they keep decreasing the prizepools!! Maybe someday the guaranteed will be 1$.
I can not believe we are that far away from the good days when this tourney easily made it passed the 300k marker!!! last week the prizepool was easily 250k.
I do not get why they don't see that this decreasing of prizepools does not attract players and it will only create a domino effect, people do not play anymore, stars decreases guaranteed a little, more people do not like it anymore,... and so on.
This is getting ridiculous. Anyone wanna bet when the Sunday Million becomes the Sunday Major or Sunday 500k or whatever?
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
06-10-2016 , 03:48 AM
To the guy about the pko guarantee

They are set on a day to day basis. Thursday is a higher attendance day so guarantee is higher than say monday. I guess
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
06-10-2016 , 05:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerStars Luke
...
Is it just me or has the uncheck "Show upcoming only" feature in tournament search results been disabled now?

So now we can only see upcoming tournaments and are not able to check the results for completed ones from previous days? Why prevent people from checking which tournament gets a good prize pool and good first place money and is therefore worth playing in?
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote

      
m