Quote:
Originally Posted by Erebgil_bg
Friday 3-max (Zoom or no) would be more popular than the current Friday Zoom
Any other thoughts on this? I quite like Fast Friday. Zoom is a format that doesn't work if it is peppered in the regular schedule, but seems to do well when it has a focused offering like this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by yeahm8
Got some free time today, had a look to see what micro reg speeds I can play and I find TWO reg speeds over a 7 HOUR period...
I am unable reproduce this. Are you sure you didn't have some filters enabled?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oink
Regarding Omanias and and PKO's
I think its at least worth a try to change some of the Omanias to PKOs or have some Omaha Bounty Builders or whatever.
Some of the more popular Omaha tours in the main schedule are the Sunday 82 PKOs (NLO8 & PLO), but also the daily 82 NLO8 PKO Hyper. (I believe the only daily Omaha tour that creates a bigger pool than this is the 55 PLO Omania).
Just looking at the number of entries and prizepools created I think its fair to say that PKOs are in higher demand than freezeouts, n-stacks or re-entries. As an example look at the daily $27 NLO8 starting at 16:05 CET and then the daily $27 NLO8 PKO about ½ hour later. The former is highlighted and has sats running for it and yet the latter consistently gets similar or higher # entries. But in general the $11-$27 PKOs attract the highest number of entries on the daily schedule.
Not saying all the Omanias should be changed to PKO (tho that would be fine with me), but imho its worth it, to at least consider if freeze outs is the way to go.
I agree with much of this, but I do not consider re-entry to be a bad option for Omania. It allows a variable buy-in to a smaller audience of unique players who are passionate about these games.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoxcarHobo
Just wanted to say thanks for devoting some attention to the omaha MTT schedule. It seems pretty clear that the n-stack isn't ideal for them, so I think if you made the Omania tagged tourneys as freezouts they would perform solidly and then added the Bounty Builder tag to some of the others they would get really big. Recs seem to be drawn to the Bounty Builder tag more than any other tournaments so getting them into some omaha mtt's would likely build the game.
It looks like there's absolutely no reason to make any plo hi tourney full ring, but making one afternoon and one morning omania full ring o8 freezout would appease the sizable (though I'm not one of them) group of regs who want some full ring 08. If they were $27s then the lower buyin players would probably fill up some satties to it as well.
We still haven't reached a decision on Omania, but I do thank everyone for providing their input. I'm not incredibly hot on the idea of all Omania tournaments becoming "Omania Bounty Builders", but pairing the brands in some minor way could provide a lot of value to Omania. We'll think a bit more on it.
As far as full ring O8 tournaments go, we'll likely have a couple additions once Euros are over. I'll look at the old schedule and see what was successful and what wasn't.
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidv1213
the "reg speed" ones go to 8/10/12 min levels later in the structure, they play at pretty much an ideal stack depth/tourney length to be used in a lot of satellites. the level times later make a huge difference and imo its a very well balanced structure
I've changed the early levels of these satellites to 6 minutes instead of 5. No more confusion!
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTXR1
Personally I like 3-Stack. Please don't make them another PKO. There are enough PKO in the schedule already.
But why do all tourneys have to be gimmicky anyways. What's wrong with vanilla?
When you are speaking of 'Omaha' tourneys would you please specify whether you mean PLO or O8 because those games are fundamentally different.
It's mostly O8 players who are complaining about the entire schedule being 6-max now. The reference that CG is played 6-max doesn't justify the switch. Holdem CG is also mostly played 6-max, but you wouldn't turn the entire HE schedule into 6-max overnight, would you? O8 was about 75% FR, turning it into 100% 6-max overnight is very unthoughtful.
Edit: I do like both 6-max and Full Ring for different reasons. I'm not a fan of 9-max though. I wish all Full Ring was made 8-max. But removing Full Ring entirely is very bad. It's always bad to remove an option, whether it's popular or not.
All fair points. To answer the bolded, Omania tournaments were vanilla before and they were not successful. They may perform better as re-entry which is "close" to vanilla, but it is good for all if more players are enticed to join the games. If it takes a gimmick to do that, so be it IMO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelvin Kerber
Luke, does the Super Sized get to the timebank faster than reg speed tournaments? everytime i have to think a bit there i feel i have to hurry
Nope, same as all the others. Too many tables?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelvin Kerber
turn 320 6max red on sundays, call it Sunday 6max with 5k stack with 50k gtd for start push 1h and i think its gonna be a success
This is something we can consider after the summer. Adding high stakes majors isn't on the table at the moment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTXR1
Now that's a start!
What really is frustrating is the lack of response. Since the start of the new schedule I have made at least 10 posts about mixed games but not a single one of them has been addressed. It's like tapping in the dark as to understand what made you do these changes and whether you are willing to listen to us.
I've been looking at the new mixed games schedules from different perspectives (Filtered, Tourney->Special, Events->'MTT schedule'->Majors|'Daily Specials'. It appears - and again we can only speculate - that you intended to unclutter the special tab and therefore have removed both 'Daily' and 'Weekly' tournaments. I see you mentioned the word 'special' in recent posts and it seems to you these tournaments were not very special. They certainly aren't in overall comparison, but for mixed games players those Weekly tournaments are special, something like their Sunday Millions.
Now I'm not sure if there is a chance to bring back the tourneys under their former label. But as you continue to run 'Omania', alternatively you could at least add the former O8 games to that umbrella. In particular:
Daily 15:30 (ET) $27 Omania FLO8, $1.5K Gtd
Sa 13:30 (ET) $215 Omania Weekly-H PLO8, $10K Gtd
Sa 13:30 (ET) $82 Omania Weekly-L PLO8, $8K Gtd
Su 13:00 (ET) $215 Omania Weekly-H NLO8, $12K Gtd
Su 13:00 (ET) $82 Omania Weekly-L NLO8, $10K Gtd
Su 14:30 (ET) $530 Omania Weekly-H FLO8, $15K Gtd
Su 14:30 (ET) $82 Omania Weekly-L FLO8, $4K Gtd
NEW: Su 16:30 (ET) $215 Sunday NLO8 Hyper [6-max], $30K Gtd
Except for the Hyper, I do suggest to make them 8-max (formerly 9-max). If you for some reason don't like the -H/-L approach please bring back at least the $215 versions. I opted for a higher buy-in for the FLO8 to target both high stakes MTT and CG players.
HORSE and 8-Game are still well represented (albeit maxed out at $82) but their individual games Stud(8), Razz, 2-7 need a comeback too. Also please revive the 'Astronomer Freerolls' to introduce new players to these games.
I very much appreciate all the suggestions - they do not go unnoticed. Since we've had a lot of discussion about Omania, I should say that my current preference is to have Omania majors. This would result in the Monday/Wednesday/Friday $320 Omahas and potentially the Sunday Grand being brought under the Omania umbrella. I think this would provide the most flexibility with the offering in terms of adding and removing tournaments while simultaneously giving them a higher profile. Any thoughts?
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_bridler
Would like to see a timebomb major on sundays
We used to have the Saturday Countdown, but its popularity declined to the point that it was removed from the schedule. Longer time tournaments are the least popular in the current offering.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wanted_Doni
Maybe wrong place to write this but anyway; What do you guys think about this suggestion:
In progressive knockouts, make them "normal knockouts" WHEN you reach the final table.
- That means you get players FULL bounty on you account when busting them on a final table.
1. Would enhance the feeling of being in the final table, more enjoyable since bounties are bigger.
2. Not so top-heavy since second and first place usually are the ones that busts people out.
What do you think?
Is there any downsides to this suggestion really???
I always appreciate innovative thinking, but this is the sort of development that would need an incredibly high upside as it fundamentally alters the logic in our system. Much of the complaints about PKO payouts can be mitigated using pay tables.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thegamewillendsoon
Yes ok. But today it had 12 players in the money instead of 11. Why is that? If they take 17 instead of 18 why would they pay 12 players when 2 tables are paid, instead of 11?
Do you have a tournament ID by chance?
Quote:
Originally Posted by FT37
Thanks for adding a mini version of the pacific rim special.
You're welcome! Has done well so far.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thegamewillendsoon
Why do some bigs have different payouts already? I see some bigs with a mincash over 2 times the buyin, paying only 12% of the players, and others paying 15% or more with a much lower mincash. What am I not getting here?
Every pay table has a range. For instance, if the range was from 2 players to 20,000 and only 1 player was paid, it could range from 50% of players paid to a fraction of a percent. There is a bit more variance in the % of players paid in tournaments with smaller fields.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChanY
It is such a sick money grab to make all sats hypers, raise theyr rake big time and then make them 1r1a conviently enough when they started raking rebuys. wtf? There used to be atleast a couple of turbo sats to all mtts but now all of them are gone for hyper turbo deep ones which is a format that SUCKS.
1R1A deep hyper-turbo sats originated in one of the COOPs some time ago and have proven to be extremely popular.
Quote:
Originally Posted by H0LDiT
On a Sunday only, you run a bunch of 200fpp 2r1a to the Mill.
Why not have them on during the week too?
If you don't think they will generate enough seats change them 500fpp
Why don't you start adding Sunday Million tickets to your daily tourneys, award FT or top 3/4 places a ticket.
Winamax has done that religiously for over a year for their weekly 150e and it works really well
With regards to the bolded, it actually becomes a possibility as of today. When Bounty Builders were launched, they were hybridized, but the downside was that they were considered satellites even though only a tiny % of the prize pool was given away as tickets. With the server restart, we should no longer have the filtering problem. We'll be testing this as soon as possible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by anuj22
These needs to be addressed too:
1) Hypers being all 6 max
While I agree they play well as 6 max but at the same time I feel not every hypers have to be 6 max. Any chance you will be adding 8 max or 9 max hypers? You can also change some of the Progressive KO hypers to 8 max/9 max
2) Lack of $3.30-$7.50 Hypers between 07:35-11:35 ET slot
In the old schedule there used to be 5 $5 buy in hypers between 07:35 - 11:35 slot but now we have NONE at that slot. What we have now is either they are very low buy ins or the buy ins are way too high. Can you have a look at their buy ins? Would like if you add couple of $5 buy in hypers at that slot. Note - there used to be 17 $5.10 hypers in the old schedule but we have now only 5 $5 buy in hypers.
3) Bigger/Hotter versions on Sundays?
Any chance bigger/hotter versions will be back? I mean you don't have to increase their time level to 12 mins or anything like that, just give them scoop like structures on Sundays and name them Bigger/Hotter. Some of the bigger/hotter gtds are almost double on Sundays but people need to know about it.
4) Timebomb rake too high- Dont think its fair to charge them 10% rake. They play as hyper turbos. Just because their time levels are of 5 mins doesn't mean they are turbos.
And yeah +1 to a timebomb major. 10,000 stack with 7 mins levels and have it run for 150-180 mins <3
Thanks for the list. I'm still unsure whether or not we'll change the hyper-turbos and would happily accept more feedback. I'm of the opinion that 6-max provides a much better player experience.
I've made a note to look at the time slots you provided that are missing some micro/low hypers.
I'll give the suggestion regarding the Bigger/Hotter some thought, but it is unlikely this change would be made before summer is over.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ORLY???
Both .eu and .fr crashed for me today, .eu crashed sunday too.
I've passed on the complaints about client crashes.