Hey Luke, here's my thoughts on the best few...
grander suggestions from the thread.
1) Reintroduction of Cubed tournaments with their own Cubed label. You know... I don't even understand why these formats are popular. To me they are just another name for Deep. But yet, they are. And because they are, there is a great opportunity to create a standardized format that offers something a bit different. With the rake revisions, these formats are no longer bad for Pokerstars, and because of the equal costs of rebuys and addons, they aren't unfair to recs who just toss in one bullet.
As we sit here and try to flesh out the depth of the schedule, having different variations will make the schedule more interesting than having insert random $11fo here across the board. Cubed helps us add more 'normal' tournaments without them all just being the same vanilla.
You don't even need to start out with a grand deployment. Test out 2 or 3 in spots across the day. Here's a few spots perhaps:
5:10 $11 Cubed
7:20 $5 Cubed
10:15 $2 Cubed
14:35 $1 Cubed
20:35 $5 Cubed
2) Reintroduction of the Sunday 6max OR introduce the Sunday Scuffle. There isn't a lot to say here. Sunday can support a major 6max event and there is a weakness in the offerings after the Big 215. Either of these options would nicely fill that space out.
3) Consideration and deployment of payout suggestions as
outlined in satellite84's post. You said you were contemplating multiple payout tables and there you go.
The idea is simple. Larger payouts in events like BIGs, Majors, COOPS. Flatter payouts in formats like turbos, hypers, and quick side mtts.
The idea I feel one of those ideas that is great for Stars and great for players. By revising payouts for specifically large, slow fields, you can bring back the excitement of big first place payouts. Part of the job of MTT's is to get peopled logged on and into the Stars client, right? Dreaming of the big payday has always been one of the strongest draws in the gambling business.
But, by keeping current, more diffused payouts for all the of the faster formats, you keep the money circulating through the system as you want. You still get players winning more often and less players feeling like they never win.
I think drafting multiple payout structures based on prestige and speed of the tournament is a great alteration for all parties.
Cheers