Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
***** Official SSSHLHE Stats Thread ***** ***** Official SSSHLHE Stats Thread *****

11-28-2010 , 02:56 AM
GG,

You need to play some more hands. Most of the numbers in those pictures are based of of a few hundred observations or less, which means they can vary by 5% or more from there true value making any advice you get about them pretty suspect.

The only two things that stand out at the moment are a slight passivity postflop and under-defending the BB pre.
11-28-2010 , 05:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leader
GG,

You need to play some more hands. Most of the numbers in those pictures are based of of a few hundred observations or less, which means they can vary by 5% or more from there true value making any advice you get about them pretty suspect.

The only two things that stand out at the moment are a slight passivity postflop and under-defending the BB pre.
Completely understand the lack of sample size, just hoping something stood out.

Passivity post?

...and more so I feel like I have been over defending BB via simply calling instead of 3! is this what you are stating? I feel like I am bleeding from the BB and thats the main leak so far and that 3! and taking control of the hand is where I am lacking?
11-28-2010 , 11:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zx9r
I also see it extremely small after clicking in the image
Hold down ctrl key and hit + and it will increase in font size
11-28-2010 , 06:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aspencer
Hold down ctrl key and hit + and it will increase in font size
Font Size is irrelevant when looking at an image.

What you can do is hold the ctrl key down while you scroll your mouse. In almost all standard web browsers this will zoom in/out on the web page you are viewing.
11-29-2010 , 03:14 PM
"I'm examining my play and just wanted to make sure I am playing well from the blinds... What do you guys think are solid numbers for BB per hand from the small and big blinds. They are obv going to be negative numbers but was just curious what some of you guys think these numbers should be. You find the stat in poker tracker by clicking the positions tab, looking at the blind seats and checking the BB/hand column. "

any takers?
11-29-2010 , 06:18 PM
in a medium sized B/E sample (had a turn cbet leak that I'm pretty sure I plugged) I was -18BB/100 in the BB and -9BB/100 in the SB. This is at .50/1 so 2:1 blinds.
12-01-2010 , 04:40 PM
quick question, maybe super obvious, but i appreciate your comments.

if someone's 3bet percentage is 12.6% does that mean your best estimate of that person's 3betting range would simply be the top 12.6% of hands in pokerstove?
12-01-2010 , 04:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobA
quick question, maybe super obvious, but i appreciate your comments.

if someone's 3bet percentage is 12.6% does that mean your best estimate of that person's 3betting range would simply be the top 12.6% of hands in pokerstove?
no, it is going to depend on the position of the original raiser, your position, and your assessment of original raisers play. like for instance i may 3bet 65s and that isn't a top hand.
12-02-2010 , 11:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by La Peste
no, it is going to depend on the position of the original raiser, your position, and your assessment of original raisers play. like for instance i may 3bet 65s and that isn't a top hand.
thank you for the comments la peste.

i guess i'm more asking a question about pokerstove, if the "%" in pokerstove accounts for the fact that there are 16 combos of AK but only 6 combos of AA.

i.e. aren't there are 1326 starting hand combos (6-AA, 16-AKo ...), but only 169 distinct hands (like AA, AKo, AKs, KK ...); so if 10% means 132 of the 1326 "combos" then thats good, but if it meant 17 of the 169 possible "hands" then that'd be a problem.

so you are in a vacuum and you have no other information than that a villain 3bets 12% in pokertracker. if you highlight up to "12%" in pokerstove, this is speaking the same language right?

just wanted to make sure.
12-02-2010 , 04:04 PM
Percentages always refer to combos, not distinct hands. You can see this in PokerStove by selecting single hands, you will get different percentages for the different hand types rather than a flat 1/169 for every hand.
12-07-2010 , 01:15 PM
I'm a little out of ideas. This is since I moved up from .5/1 to 1/2.
I feel like I should be beating the limit or have better results then the ones I have at the moment..
My stats are fine I guess, maybe I should defend a little more from SB and BB. Or is this a sample size issue?
Any help is appreciated.



Uploaded with ImageShack.us



Uploaded with ImageShack.us



Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Thanks!
12-07-2010 , 01:29 PM
Too nitty all the way around and lol sample size
12-07-2010 , 04:45 PM
Post your positions stats Pukk.
12-07-2010 , 06:13 PM


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Here the position stats.
I don't think you need to play very loose at 1/2. I don't think there is something wrong with playing 25/19 but maybe I'm alone with that opinion?
12-07-2010 , 07:07 PM
you are a bit too tight in all positions. perhaps you can win at this level being this nitty, but to do so you are surely passing up +EV situations.
12-07-2010 , 11:30 PM
steal more, iso-raise more
12-08-2010 , 01:48 AM
Can someone smart tell me how to figure out my hourly after RB? Is this even all the info needed?

I started as Supernovaz and hit the 300k milestone ldo
12-08-2010 , 01:55 AM
you could try the pokertracker support forum. But if you assume the numbers are correct then it's right there... questions is if they represent what we think they do, calculation could be funky.
12-08-2010 , 02:03 AM
Pretend I had no idea what you just said.

What?
12-08-2010 , 06:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by La Peste
you are a bit too tight in all positions. perhaps you can win at this level being this nitty, but to do so you are surely passing up +EV situations.
What would be good opening percentages for all the positions?
12-08-2010 , 09:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 175503
I started as Supernovaz and hit the 300k milestone ldo
Just under $40/hr

Last edited by jph0424; 12-08-2010 at 09:14 AM. Reason: work more hours imo
12-08-2010 , 02:29 PM




These are my stats from .5-1. and i just got in 10 k hands this week after moving up finally and am eager for feedback. Can anybody see anything glaringly off the mark? I was wondering if i should be defending less at .5-1. because of raketrap stakes. Am i too aggressive, not aggressive enough?

Can anybody see where i can loosen up or tighten up as far as when to open raise?
12-08-2010 , 02:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jph0424
Just under $40/hr
lol show your work how'd you get that
12-08-2010 , 03:22 PM
I figured 40% Rakeback b/c 300k milestone after being SN is close to that. Then i did it in my head but i just confirmed in excel. $39/hr.

((rakeback % * rake) + winnings)/hours
12-08-2010 , 03:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Distajo
Can anybody see where i can loosen up or tighten up as far as when to open raise?
Looks really good overall. Maybe steal more, 3! pf a lil more, and showdown just a little bit more. I think at micros stealing more would be especially good.

      
m