This is akin to the gay marriage issue. I completely support gay marriage and have supported homosexual rights my entire adult life. The government also supports it. That being said, I also see how religious people do not recognize it and do not accept it. I can accept that they do not accept it...
Who, really, is the intolerant one here?
You are, and so would the religious people be too if they advocated violence to prevent gay marriages from taking place they way you advocate it to prevent TG people from using the toilet of their choice.
You guys had already moved on from denying warming, past denying human causes and it not being a big deal and were headed for it costing too much to do anything about and clouding the atmosphere with something to block sunlight. (See the 5 stages of domer)
But, I guess Trump, the scientific genius, has emboldened you all to go back to calling it fake news.
The scheme they have fallen for is the same old 'buy time to pollute/profit by keeping the arguments going'.
I don't disparage minorities, I never had. I do blame them for not overcoming prejudice.
Never had, until the immediate next sentence.
It's easy to overcome - ignore it. It's a choice. Jewish people have been hated for how many centuries now? They are the most successful group of people on the planet. Do you think that's just some sort of weird coincidence?
I've never been bullied in my life. If someone has an issue with me I just whoop his ass in the street. That shuts people up pretty quickly.
I bully you into tears like once a month on this website, dude.
95% of STEM scientist did not agree with that at all. Pretty much everyone agrees the world is going through a warming phase. That is not a question. The question is what impact does carbon have on it and what should we do about it.
If we turned off every power plant on the planet right now, would that be a net negative or a net positive on human beings? We obviously know that answer, it's a catastrophic negative. We also can't limit other countries like India from their energy needs, as their countries can only grow as much as their ability to provide that energy.
So no, I don't agree with you at all that global warming is a "very bad thing". It happens, it has happened in the past, and will happen again in the future. We must decide whether curbing carbon emissions will help that and if it's worth the tradeoff. We are no where in the same universe in agreement of this.
Remember when I said the reason's Trump ant-farm-brain interview transcripts are so hilarious to us but don't hurt him with the base is because he thinks about issues the same way they do?
As a note : this is just as I suspected, that you are a trans person or someone who is very close to a trans person. This is also the reason why you can't have a rational discussion about the topic.
If you haven't already put me on ignore, shall I quote the posts where you state that people who DO NOT have children/ARE NOT minorities/et cetera ____, are not capable of having a rational discussion about the topics?
You couldn't bully your way out of a wet paper bag, dip****.
Well, of course not. If one were stuck in a wet paper bag, I don't think bullying the bag would solve the problem. One would probably have to poke or tear a hole in the bag, or find the opening, to escape.
You guys really don't think these zingers through, huh?