There's so much stupid going on here that it's hard to address it all, so maybe the simplest way is to just look at this one part that expresses the idea your argument hinges on:
Quote:
Originally Posted by BitchiBee
CNN has 93% negative coverage of trump
"Treasonous" is not the difference between 92% and 93%, nor between X% and X+1% at any level. "Treasonous" is a word that means something and you have clearly lost sight of what that is in your anti-CNN rage.
Again,
you said treason is lying and undermining the president (which is a hilarious state-slobbering definition to begin with that hearkens back to GWB-era "you do not criticize the president during times of war" garbage), and there's a reason you're shifting those goalposts miles downfield to suddenly pretend like it's #actually about
how much lying and undermining is taking place, Republican levels are totally not treason but
Democrats, wow, much treasonous, very treason.