Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
President Trump President Trump

07-11-2017 , 10:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
His statement about the meeting changed after every single New York Times story that was released, LOL "transparent"
Since when has changing one's story been a standard on the Left? I mean at this point, what difference does it make?
07-11-2017 , 10:09 PM
Some of wil's best friends are psychologists.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
This post is a little peek into the minds of leftists. Notice he said "****ty beliefs"? That is a reference to his admitted judgemental attitude towards something he disagrees with.

See, the difference between you and me is I can accept there are differences and circumstances which need to be addressed in a certain way to achieve maximum result. You care about how those methods are interpreted by others.

Typical leftist feelings-based bull****. I'm very open to learning new things, which is why I've come to the conclusion I have. When I was an idiot I used to think like you, buying into the bull****. Not anymore.
07-11-2017 , 10:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TiltedDonkey
who?
My money's on the answer being "someone mentioned on Fox News within mongidig's attention span"
07-11-2017 , 10:10 PM
I heard there are no more leftists, they are all Americans now.
07-11-2017 , 10:10 PM
Two questions for the Leftists here

1) If Veselnitskaya (the lawyer) is connected to Fusion GPS (the 'pee' dossier firm), then is that problematic to the narrative?

2) Since we know the Obama Justice department was thoroughly corrupt in relation to candidate Clinton, as well as the American Media, who should the Russians have turned over their evidence of Clinton/Russian collusion during an election year? Chris Cuomo "it's only legal for the press to have these documents" style answers will not count.
07-11-2017 , 10:13 PM
The campaign/regime has had like a whole year to come clean- personally responsible with bibles in hand like good Christian Republican Americans. But no.....
07-11-2017 , 10:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
The campaign/regime has had like a whole year to come clean- personally responsible with bibles in hand like good Christian Republican Americans. But no.....
There's nothing to come clean about.

Don Jr: Have you stopped colluding with Russia?

When did the Leftist media stop beating their wives?
07-11-2017 , 10:19 PM
07-11-2017 , 10:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mongidig
Don was straight up on Hannity. He has been super transparent. This is again a bunch of nothing.

Lets talk about how Linda Sarsour wants to wage Jihad against our government. I'd say this constitutes treason. If found guilty she will be put to death.
citation please (Linda Sarsour)
07-11-2017 , 10:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
Two questions for the Leftists here

1) If Veselnitskaya (the lawyer) is connected to Fusion GPS (the 'pee' dossier firm), then is that problematic to the narrative?

2) Since we know the Obama Justice department was thoroughly corrupt in relation to candidate Clinton, as well as the American Media, who should the Russians have turned over their evidence of Clinton/Russian collusion during an election year? Chris Cuomo "it's only legal for the press to have these documents" style answers will not count.
citation please (bolded)
07-11-2017 , 10:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Cut
citation please (Linda Sarsour)
Have you not been paying attention.

Let me help you with that "internet" thing:

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=linda+sarsour+jihad
07-11-2017 , 10:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Cut
citation please (Linda Sarsour)
Google it
07-11-2017 , 10:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Cut
citation please (bolded)
Just obtuse aren't you?

You are aware of the tarmac meeting, the "matter", Clinton Foundation.

Please just go back and read the last 300+ pages here, you'll find all the citation you need.
07-11-2017 , 10:26 PM
no, how it works is you provide citations for the claims you made. thx
07-11-2017 , 10:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
My money's on the answer being "someone mentioned on Fox News within mongidig's attention span"
Well we know you're not the sharpest tool in the shed.
07-11-2017 , 10:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Cut
no, how it works is you provide citations. thx
If you don't have a basic understanding of current events then you should probably go back to the beginner forum.
07-11-2017 , 10:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Cut
no, how it works is you provide citations for the claims you made. thx
They've already been provided. Stop trying to derail the thread, amateur.
07-11-2017 , 10:29 PM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linda_Sarsour

Quote:
Speaking at the Islamic Society of North America Convention in Chicago in July 2017, Sarsour, citing Islamic scripture, said the best form of jihad was "a word of truth in front of a tyrant ruler or leader", and "I hope that we when we stand up to those who oppress our communities that Allah accepts from us that as a form of jihad...not only abroad in the Middle East or on the other side of the world, but here in these United States of America where you have fascists and white supremacists and Islamophobes reigning in the White House." Sarsour met with backlash from conservative media outlets and personalities for her use of the word "jihad." She denied that she was calling for violence of any kind.[30][31]
07-11-2017 , 10:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by samsonh
To be fair wil has to go to that sweet night shift job so he's hopefully not liquored up.
Make more than you, and most of America, homie.

Spoiler:
Pro night shift workers drink during the mornings, idiot.
07-11-2017 , 10:33 PM
ty microbet. I expected as much -- both arguments are redic. bans pls (although I'm not 100% on 7.0 etiquette)
07-11-2017 , 10:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mongidig
Well we know you're not the sharpest tool in the shed.
1 hour old on foxnews.com, says it was reported on TV earlier too

lol you're so bad at this
07-11-2017 , 10:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
Since we know the Obama Justice department was thoroughly corrupt in relation to candidate Clinton, as well as the American Media, who should the Russians have turned over their evidence of Clinton/Russian collusion during an election year?
Amusingly, along with predicting the "Don Jr. is so transparent" reaction, DVaut also predicted JiggyMac's "Don Jr. was the only place Russia could turn to to SAVE AMERICA FROM HILLARY" reaction earlier today:

Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
But the right is slowly, incrementally working themselves into full Iran-Contra mode: that thing we denied and lampooned you for believing happened actually happened just as you said, but in the end we cavorted with a hostile power for the betterment of America, really you should thank us. It's like that Narcissist Prayer joke meme from earlier: that didn't happen --> if it did, we didn't know --> it wasn't that bad --> actually we did it, you should be happy about it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
They're moving to the "we did it, no biggie" defense because they assume the email trail was going to become public anyway. Now they can pretend they were transparent and this isn't a big deal.

As others have commented over the past few months, this is a lot like Iran Contra: Sure, we cavorted with America's enemy, but only to defeat the bigger menace. Russia is swapped in for Iran and menacing liberal Democrats swapped in for the Nicaraguan Sandinistas. I'm surprised the Oliver North patsy-cum-right-wing-hero role would actually be a Trump kid, you'd have to think Manafort or Flynn would have been far more likely, but such as it is, expect Donald Jr. to be a cherished right-wing icon with an FNC pundit gig after he is pardoned.
07-11-2017 , 10:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Quote:
Originally Posted by mongidig
Don was straight up on Hannity. He has been super transparent. This is again a bunch of nothing.

Lets talk about how Linda Sarsour wants to wage Jihad against our government. I'd say this constitutes treason. If found guilty she will be put to death.
His statement about the meeting changed after every single New York Times story that was released, LOL "transparent"
rofl oh wow. definitely believe this guy about what happened in this private meeting, after he lied about it twice in a row after fully denying it for a year.
07-11-2017 , 10:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Amusingly, along with predicting the "Don Jr. is so transparent" reaction, DVaut also predicted JiggyMac's "Don Jr. was the only place Russia could turn to to SAVE AMERICA FROM HILLARY" reaction earlier today:
This narrative misses the most important part of the story - that there's nothing there.

When the Russian lawyer had useful information and the DNC turns over their servers to the FBI - let me know, we'll talk.
07-11-2017 , 10:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreaminAsian
rofl oh wow. definitely believe this guy about what happened in this private meeting, after he lied about it twice in a row after fully denying it for a year.
See my previous comment:

Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
Since when has changing one's story been a standard on the Left? I mean at this point, what difference does it make?

      
m