What do you mean? I asked for a cite of why she didn't finish. I mean she didn't finish it, I am confused what I an lying about. Also have no idea what a #gater is.

Yes, I would like you to show where you are getting your data that men are victims of harassment more than women, too much of your blathering is based on your feels.

Its L.K´s way of saying that no matter what you say it doesnt matter since you are on the shortlist of labels that are evil. #gater is being in the gamergate movement and therefor evil. If he throws around #MRA you are a mens right activist and also evil. He will also throw out some racist baits to get you into that label aswell. This helps people that cant argue for their thing and instead says that you are affiliated with a group and therefor whatever you say is invalid.

She's made tons of videos, dip****.

You may be right, I may have confused things while reading the article and trying to work. So lets sum up.
You linked to the Blatchford article which implies that Elliot did no wrong and is being ruined by vindictive women.
I linked to a Vice article claiming Blatchford has a history of taking the Men's side of gender stories and that she is not being objective and bringing up things like the actual tweets that support the case being brought against him. Tweets that were bad enough to convince a prosecutor to bring the case in the first place.
You claim that none of that means anything because the author of the Vice story disclosed his friendship with the accuser?

So you just hand wave away the bias of Blatchford? Have you seen the tweets in question or are you just going off of descriptions in the articles you read about it? Seems to me that constantly being tweeted at by someone you have blocked wouldn't have to actually mention physical threats for an average person to find harassing.

You questioned that men are more likely to be victims of violence and threats. You should stop living in that ideological bubble and venture out into society.

If you want studies that show how men are more victim of the feminist umbrella definition of harrassment i dont have any of those but im very interested in you showing your work because it would go against the trend that men are the perpetrators but also the victims of most violence.

So it's "make baseless assertion after baseless assertion and demand others prove you wrong until they get tired of it" day?

Sure it is buddy, props on looking up where I live though, not a lot of people know that about me.

You **** children bro. That's who you are.

Can't believe you're not banned.

That article was just one I found today. There are plenty of other articles and news reports about it. Are they all biased? I mean you attacked the author of mine, I attacked yours. Seems like a wash.

I can see how someone could see that as harassment, but criminal harassment? No I don't see that. I don't think someone should possibly go to jail for 6 months because they tweeted at you and it bothered. Look, if you are going to be an advocate for political views and put yourself out there for people to see and read, then you are going to have to be able to handle criticism and debate beliefs with those against you. He probably shouldn't have been tweeting them after they blocked them. Then again they shouldn't have blocked him because he disagreed with them. That is my belief

Haha yeah sure that's who I am.

I apologize, you are correct, she has finished it now. Last I read she hadn't.

Uhhhh, you were just boasting about how you live somewhere that child-****ing is legal. As if that made you less horrible.

So yeah, that's who you are.

How on earth did you find that out?

Yak,

An AMA on being a pedophile would be informative, and help clear some things up!

I'm sure there's more to it, but none of you guys will ever articulate what it is you're so worked up about.

I don't think either one of us know what he tweeted. Without knowing that it's difficult to make a judgement of what kind of harassment it was or what level it rose to. If the women he was tweeting at had gone through with the doxing or pedo accusations then they could probably be charged with the same thing. But until we see what was tweeted it is just as difficult to say he is blameless as to say he deserved what he got.

Yak,

My postulation on paedos basically goes like this:

"I personally can sit alone in a room with an attractive woman and not rape her 100% of the time, therefore it should be likely that a pedo can exist in society and not be dangerous. However, there must be some sort of brain abnormality in being attracted to children, as they are not emotionally developed creatures. As such, I can 100% not trust them to behave as I would, and thus they should be firmly ostracized."

Fair enough

https://www.generosity.com/fundraisi...l-support-fund

His sons have started a fundraiser to cover his bills from this ordeal.

Wow, I didn't think this thread could get dumber after the proposal that we determine whether sexism was real by polling men.

Care to elaborate? Or just going to throw out broad statements.

I had a cheese steak for lunch which is also orthogonal to his guilt or innocence.

Was it good? Also, good word orthogonal.

Is this how you feel about everyone with mental problems? A lot of mental (and even physical) issues can cause the person having them to hurt others but it doesnt mean they act on it or that they always have a choice when doing so. This thread isnt really about that and I know my input will only make certain people attack me.