This is just silly. We've all read the comments posted on internet forums, especially the ones where they can be anonymous. Racial/sexist/threatening/ suicide-encouraging posts have always been there and continue to be.

I was informed countless times I'd be raped or encouraged to kill myself after games of Starcraft. Where was the outrage?

L.K isnt waiting for anything. He will ignore anything relevant and disrupt anything else with some ******ed gotchas.

Most bullying women recieve is from other women in female centered spaces of the internet. The small part that comes from men is when the male and female world collides. I think the biggest issue is that on the internet there isnt the same amount of men softplaying women as they do in face to face interactions. Men recieve just as much(probably more) harassment, threats etc as women but shrug them off easier while women due to not being used to the male way of communicating feels much more threatened.

What male in the gaming world in the last decade received the same amount of threats as the woman in the gamergate thing did sputnik ?

It's interesting that people like Sam Harris or Salman Rushdie, people who actually talk about important topics, are totally glossed-over when they have credible death threats and need 24/7 security and weapons training, but when a female catches some harassment on the internet by a 14 year old we all need to pause and reflect about male privilege.

And why the hell is the word privilege so hard to spell? wtf I had to look it up.

I think you worded that question badly. What you should have asked is how many men had the opportunity to build a career on being "threatened". Aka professional victims. Many men have said or done dumb things and gotten bashed into the ground by internet mobs but since its man on man we dont really care that much. When its man on woman all hell breaks lose and its the true sign of patriarchy and misogyny and many men rush to the aid of those poor defenseless women that are being attacked by evil.

Nothing like starting a business based on getting death threats. I'm sure all women aspire to such heights, huh putzy?

But yes, misogynists like putzy and Steven don't get any benefit of the doubt. Them making up stuff is a given. Them providing evidence is non-existent.

Also huge lol that Yak is trying to be a voice of reason to putzy. Time to take a look in the mirror when that happens.

Lol at thinking no men have made a business on being victims.

lol. You truly are stupid.

The majority of people looking for fame and fortune would absolutely love to have that kind of exposure. Without exposure, there is no fame. Who the hell would even know who someone like Anita is it weren't for the massive butthurt and the faux-outrage being generated by it?

If you don't think she loves every second of it, you're nuts.

I didn't, it was worded correctly. Just looking for an answer. There are tonnes of male professional victims and I agree that this Sarkeezy person is one of the many professional victims in the world, it doesn't make the problem itself any smaller. Most male professional victims do belong to some kind of minority/protected class though just like she does. Again, what male from the gaming world has been harassed in the same way she was ?

wil you think she loved every second of this? From wiki

Loved
Every
Second

Without a doubt.

Wil just being a gender realist, amirite?

I wonder if putzy is also furious about race hustlers?

And what does this mean? Is this some level of harassment/threat that is unheard of? Salman Rushdie had a fatwa ordered against him by the Ayatollah. Anita gets some hatemail and all of a sudden she's considered on the level of a civil rights worker in the 60s.

No rational person could think a moron like Sarkeesian would ever reach the heights of fame she has without controversy like this.

Do any of you truly think her life is in danger? Like, someone is really going to rape or murder her? Granted, threats can be considered differently by different people, but we can all somewhat agree that she's not truly in a life-threatening situation here. No one's pulling out an AR-15 and mowing down the women with blue hair and black lipstick surrounding her to assassinate her. She's being harassed by internet trolls.

Hell, Spank's been harassed in this forum longer.

Im assuming with professional victim sputniks means that its making her a daily pay check, probably even more then she would had she not been harassed. It doesnt necessarily mean she enjoyed it, some jobs are crappy.

So threats made against men are more likely to happen than threats made against women?

Yes. Without a doubt. If it was a level of harassment/danger that she couldn't handle, she'd simply drop out of the public eye and be done with it. Many people have decided to do exactly that. Some people, like her, turn it into a career.

I love how people like you make these stupid one-liners. "Well duh, lets turn this all into a one question simple argument lol".

Of course not, Kerowolololololollllllllolololololol. Thanks for wasting everyone's time with your stupid ass question.

As if we didn't already assume this, add the current topic to the unending list of things wil has no ****ing clue about but still considers himself an absolute authority on.

Never considered myself an authority on this at all, please quote where I've said that. In fact, I've mentioned exactly the opposite.

I can just tell idiocy from reality. You are an idiot.


Edit : I like how you didn't address one of my points, you simply attacked me. Nice way of arguing.

Wil, you've proven you're worthless to converse with. You don't learn or think or understand. If you can't pay attention when a thousand bucks are on the line, what chance do I have using words alone?

Hmmmm...

"Pedophilia is termed pedophilic disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), and the manual defines it as a paraphilia in which adults or adolescents 16 years of age or older have intense and recurrent sexual urges towards and fantasies about prepubescent children that they have either acted on or which cause them distress or interpersonal difficulty.[1] The International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) defines it as a sexual preference for children of prepubertal or early pubertal age.[3]"


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia

I guess there might be a clause in the ICD or DSM indicating that local laws of Botswana or wherever the **** you live can magically make ****ing children not pedophilia.

But please, continue explaining how much you hate feminists.

I disagree. I've changed my position many times in the past and have conceded well argued points countless amounts of times, something I've never once seen you do.

Once again, you bring up worthless arguments. You can discredit the points I've made or deflect it and avoid it by bringing up a subject that I couldn't care about less over and over, but if you think people don't notice your tactics, you're wrong.

lol @ "a thousand bucks on the line". lol you people.

We cant really know since they gain nothing from showing it. Anitas whole business is dependant on her being harrassed and will therefor show every little thing that has happened to her. Criticism becomes hate, hate becomes misogyny, misogyny becomes death threats.



From the wiki:

Most of the so called harrassment is criticism and the quote above but it all gets lumped into a nice looking pile of death and rape threats.

And she will also encourage more "threats" by never ever respond to criticism while telling the whole gaming industry what pieces of **** they are. All in a loop of "harassment" and pity money for Anita.

Its a great business model and thats why we have seen the feminist gaming victim list grow after they saw what a gold mine Anitas model was.

This is where you're wrong, my urges are only recurrent and not intense. Again, I kind of love feminists, there is something about that fire in their eyes which makes me go coo coo for cocoa...

Why do you think I hate feminists ? Its kind of out of nowhere, Im pro fairness for the sexes so please entertain me.

Recurrent urges to **** children counts bro, per the definition.

And I also DGAF to hear you muse over the intensity of your urges to bang young kids, though doing so would almost surely get you banned, so feel free? Like the self reported intensity levels of pedophiles who know down-playing said levels could loop-hole them out of a diagnosis is perhaps the single most biased form of self reporting imaginable.

You're sick bro, like truly, and your hot takes on women's rights are not welcome here. GTFO.

Ofc it is. Men are more likely to suffer violence and threats. If you have ever done something really competitive like sports or politics you should know that men arent very nice to eachother while we are very different towards women.

Women in spaces with alot of men might feel more threatened but thats a whole different beast.