Quote:
Originally Posted by Deuces McKracken
Adding "GRANTING ALL OF THE ARABS IN ISRAEL FULL CIVIL RIGHTS" to "THERE IS NO OCCUPATION", "THE SETTLEMENTS ARE LEGAL", and "ISRAEL DOESN'T HAVE NUCLEAR WEAPONS" to the list of backwards wrong beliefs that make having a discussion with gamblor problematic. There are some others I am forgetting. Of course the backwards false beliefs are just one of several categories of reasons why having a discussion with gamblor is problematic. It's better to think of it like bowling or something, but you don't brag about winning because the other guy has serious problems, looks a little downsy, and throws straight serial gutterballs.
Writing in all caps doesn't make your false dichotomy, that of either murderously racially colonizing a nation of people out from their own land or suffer interminable persecution elsewhere in the world, any less false. You could sign on to the peace process with good faith efforts instead of sabotaging it. You could assume other peoples are human beings too, a lot like you.
It was only 60 years or so ago that the term Judeo-Christian was even invented. Before that, you had signs on beaches saying "no jews or negros" ffs. So why not start using the term Islamo-Chrisitan as a way to spread the love? These are all Abrahamic religions, whoever that is.
Ah yes, the classic Deuces rant: assume the premise, appeal to authority, build a straw man, and employ hyperbole. When it's all done, delegitimize the debate itself.
Too stupid for words. Just your typical third-year sociology student at a fifth-tier small college in Bum****, Michigan.
We all take comfort knowing that you'll soon be spewing your hate on a street corner, using a sandwich board instead of a computer.
lol deuces