lol pls to be telling what "bias" you speak of?

i endorse trolly's posts, btw.

lol bro, it was a pretty big part of this thread (or some other one, idk) and the running math/SMP jokes are still funny, so nah, it's prob not gonna end any time soon. better keep your violin handy.

Chez, say something --anything about Mike Brown or the Ferguson PD.

I largely swerved it because the whole thing was noisy enough and there was **** all I could add. As a rule I prefer for good points to be made well and for people to reign it in a little when trying to make a point. That said it's the internets so what the **** do I expect.

I have no violin.

I agree it wont end soon as it's how the kids in the playground want the forum to be. Doesn't bother me even though like you I would prefer more content.

You may not be aware that after I joked a bit at letsgambool's expense for his obsession with another poster he turned his loving gaze on me and decided to repeatedly turn threads In this forum into noise about Bruce. That's his choice, I don't really mind except for consideration to others I suggest he limits it to that thread in PU.

I have in this very thread.

If you have any questions on any of it then feel free to ask.

k bro, i still hear violin sounds and u said that already like 50 times in the past 2 pages

(and bolded is obv a lie)

It's your ear. You can't hear Trolly for what he is either.

It actually doesn't bother me at all. I only stopped talking about the Brucez fiasco because I think people want to move on. Letsgambool has determinedly removed that option.

That's a fairly well stupid thing to post. It's the combined power of a false accusation based on superficial, one-sided opinion with a claim of guilty by association. Really stupid.

Chez, my favorite post of yours was when you made a long post in SMP after BruceZ got remodded. Think there was a picture of a drink, a toast to him, and talk about how all that mean racist talk was behind him and he was rightfully back on his throne.

What makes that post great, of course, is that since he's got less emotional control than an infant he got himself demodded by spazzing out in the mod forum. pretty much immediately thereafter. Nothing to do with the politics forum, or even racism, actually, just an angry old **** with a screw loose self-immolating and then taking his ball and going home.

So every time you talk about it (or, I should say, talk around it because you actually trying to say something and make a direct point would be like seeing a ****ing unicorn), try to troll with "fiasco" or "usual-usual" or any of your other tone police nonsense, I think of that post, and it just makes me smile thinking of how those interactions you had with him are gone for good.

I was just welcoming the result. It was good result imo. The throne talk is just you being a bit weird.

He made some bad posts when maybe not in the best frame of mind and he took responsibility for them.

You are quite right he didn't leave because of you lot. Your spin on it is just more of your usual nonsense.

you do what you like to make yourself smile, it's all about you and your weird obsessions.

If others want the forum free of the Brucez fiasco then they know who to talk to.

Perfect, should be the end of chez posting in politics at least if we have a containment thread.

Thats exatly what happened. Bruce got remodded, spazzed out in the mod forum and pissed everyone off, then got demodded and took his ball home.

Super I look forward to you only bringing up the Brucez fiasco here.

Maybe you can persuade Fly and a few of the others to agree as well.

Nah, its perfect, when you tone police and make veiled BruceZ/proxy references, your posts get moved here. No need to mention it, they'll get moved to the appropriate topic.

Lol you are loony tunes.

Anybody know the origins of the "tone policing" accusation. It sounds like something a racist would say to avoid criticism.

cry about it then, i don't care. if you look at the context in which i said that, you'll see that the person i quoted referred to some "atrocious" posting against bruce and co. i'm basically saying who cares about them, they deserved to have atrocious posts hurled their way (even tho i can't even remember any that would qualify).

regardless, i'm not going to get into a back and forth with you because quite frankly i find all your posts to be smug, pretentious, but most importantly they are overly wordy and laborious to get through. in other words, i'd rather read as few of them as possible.

Oh, you are the one crying for jumping on a bandwagon of poorly considered accusation trolling. And of course you don't care, people who care wouldn't jump on really stupid bandwagons.to earn internet troll cred.

It's a good concept, the idea being that oppressed people lacking privilege shouldn't be shut up because they are angry when they speak.

People like letsgambool and Fly who on 2+2 aren't being oppressed and aren't lacking in privileged hiding behind that to justify being unable to behave like half decent people is just pathetic.

Well as Trolly was telling straightforward blatant lies I think we know where your bias is.

It's not like my posts are hard to find.

See, now you are posting this in the right thread. Nice job!

Pleased you are happy.

Don't worry you wont ever be tone policed in the P forum by me or anyone else - you are not being oppressed or lacking in privilege. Pathetic you maybe at times, but we can't tone police that.

Wow, two straight on topic posts! A chez record, nice job!

3

So it's not really tone policing, it is emotional policing, which means it is not a one-size fits all concept. Why on earth are they using it to troll though? It doesn't make sense ( but probably does in troll-think). They aren't oppressed, as you say, and their own anti-social behavior is legitimate to call out right to their face. It's not just their "tone" which is their problem, it's like the whole package. Even to the motives of why frequently post anti-social crap, apparently in the name of justice?

Besides, aren't they being the tone police themselves by tone policing the critics of their behavior by calling them the tone police?