Quote:
Originally Posted by nyiballs
This is very valid... I would say that the protocol would have to be that the players get their money in and can only then decide to run it twice after the final action has been made. I agree that Player C asking Player B to run it twice if he calls while Player A is already all-in is unacceptable and unfair to Player A. Better that Player C calls, tells the dealer to wait, THEN asks Player B if he wants to run it twice for the sidepot.
Just going through this... I have talked myself out of thinking it's a good idea.
Even having the possibility of running it twice could impact Player C's decision to call though, especially if Player B and C are regulars and know that they will decide to run it twice. This might make it more likely that Player C calls when he might not otherwise.
Say all this happens on the flop and Player A is ahead and B and C are on draws. If Player C gets lucky and hits his card on the first board, not only does he get half the side-pot, he also takes the main pot from Player A. If there was no option to run it twice, he may not have called the large re-pot by Player B and Player A would have won the main pot.