Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
TT, HU, very deep vs Krantz TT, HU, very deep vs Krantz

03-21-2009 , 12:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CitizenJames
He probably would have said that if he meant that. His words: "Also i think your turn bet while stnd vs 95% of hsnlers, is pretty terrible vs krantz w/ these stacks."
i dunno why you're so sure he meant NOT to bet turn, period. that sentence can easily be interpreted to mean "i think [the size of] your turn bet ... is pretty terrible vs krantz."
03-21-2009 , 01:45 AM
it's pretty clear that durrr meant not betting the turn with these stacks is advisable vs krantz, and that he wasn't referring to bet sizing.
03-21-2009 , 06:36 AM
Yeah, doesn't seem all that debatable to me.
03-21-2009 , 12:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CitizenJames
Yeah, doesn't seem all that debatable to me.
that may be, and i think i remember this now. i also think that it is debatable that durrrr still thinks that and / or that the general consensus is that as well

twp was the most clear person on advocating a turn bet imo and i think he is right, for me the hand should be played (assuming we smooth flop) as:
call flop
bet / bet turn or bet / call CR
and call non club river shove (though this is not the best river Im still in there like swimwear)
03-21-2009 , 12:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CitizenJames
Obviously, but I think krantz's c/r range here is more weighted towards airballs than semi bluffs, and the equity gained from folding out QsJx and whatnot does not make up for the equity lost when krantz shoves the river anyways after missing (and I strongly disagree with alaei that krantz is checking most of his airballs / missed draws considering he isn't really expecting us to fold most of our made range/non floats on the turn in the first place to the c/r when his line appears so damn fishy, so more of a setup to the homerun river imo).
the bold i disagree with / dont think that even if it were true it would mean you should shove turn

and the italics i agree with

for me both your statement arnt true, if they were i think you would be right (i like the line that you are recommending [unless it involves checking the turn the first time through])
03-21-2009 , 01:47 PM
geez how did you get so deep ?
03-21-2009 , 06:21 PM
Great bump, ty.
07-05-2009 , 11:38 AM
is it me or does it look like team cardrunners and team dc are trying to level each other itt
07-06-2009 , 05:54 PM
agree team DC 1 team cardrunners 0
08-09-2009 , 11:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CitizenJames
I remember reading this thread before I had even bothered registering under 2p2 and not understanding why durrr was against betting the turn.
Perhaps what durrr was getting at was to avoid allowing Krantz to build a pot , leaving hero to decide whether he's calling or folding to a river shove.

If hero checks the turn, it will be a much easier call on the river, due to the smaller pot size.

Only thing I can think to add.
08-09-2009 , 01:29 PM
Sick hand, sick thread
08-09-2009 , 02:21 PM
"Taylor, Jman28, Durrrr, Krantz, whitelime, ansky, genius28, bldswtrs, Daniel Alaei, foxwoodsfiend, ike, mastr have all posted in this thread. Why does this never happen anymore?"-kb24
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoahSD
You're not entitled to these people's opinions for free.

Still, pretty awesome bump.
That doesn't make it any less sad
08-09-2009 , 09:32 PM
I find it very interesting that durrrr thinks a turn bet against Krantz is awful but he would raise flop almost 100% of the time.
I think a flop raise against most competent aggro regs seems pretty standard.
08-09-2009 , 09:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldjude
I find it very interesting that durrrr thinks a turn bet against Krantz is awful but he would raise flop almost 100% of the time.
I think a flop raise against most competent aggro regs seems pretty standard.
that was in 2007
08-10-2009 , 02:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PLAYOFFS
that was in 2007
durrrr, Krantz and TC were still a lot better in 07 than i am now
12-05-2009 , 10:11 AM
Belive this diserves a BUMP.
12-05-2009 , 10:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldjude
durrrr, Krantz and TC were still a lot better in 07 than i am now
lol, you couldn't be more wrong. they may have been better adjusted to their own games in that time than you'd be (i.e., he'd be able to decipher and play out his own hands better than you'd be able to play his hands), but chances are if you played them any heads up vs them in the past you'd crush them. its just the evolution of poker.

Last edited by DOG IS HEAD; 12-05-2009 at 10:45 AM. Reason: hell, you don't even have to go back in time to crush taylor
12-05-2009 , 02:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DOG IS HEAD
lol, you couldn't be more wrong. they may have been better adjusted to their own games in that time than you'd be (i.e., he'd be able to decipher and play out his own hands better than you'd be able to play his hands), but chances are if you played them any heads up vs them in the past you'd crush them. its just the evolution of poker.
A good read....http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/show...fpart=all&vc=1
12-07-2009 , 01:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlocdog
I'm definitely not good enough or smart enough to refute/crush limon's post, but something tells me DIH is
12-07-2009 , 02:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlocdog
i change by not changing at all...
12-07-2009 , 05:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aejones
man, this thread just makes me realize how horribad everyone is.
I am just a railbird, but I had the exact same impression. This whole hand reminds me of this epic Harrington quote
Quote:
When I hear someone telling a story about how he shrewdly laid down middle set after some intricate chain of reasoning convinced him he was beaten, my quick (but silent) reaction is "Idiot".

Last edited by Shandrax; 12-07-2009 at 05:52 PM.
12-10-2009 , 05:44 PM
nice bump guys, really cool hand.
01-14-2010 , 05:08 PM
I woulda folded TT on flop to avoid all tough spots on later streets. OBV
01-14-2010 , 08:48 PM
it's pretty clear that this was a snap call
01-15-2010 , 06:52 AM
lol good bump, very interesting thread

      
m