last 300 tournaments consist of a 15 buyin downswing at the 23's and a 15 buyin downswing at the 11.5's

i obviously suck at poker

Thanks Taikogod. You seem to be the first one that gets it, thanks for pointing it out and proving my point. I say 35% ROI over 100 is doable, and the board comes out with

ANY REG WILL BET YOU THAT YOU CANT HAVE ROI 35% OVER 1000 HANDS. OH YOU WON"T TAKE THAT BET?

So yes taikogod, the entire bet thread, starting with the fool that posted the above bet is pointless. .

wtf at all the long posts

and fml i hate live poker why do i even bother

tgsm you know carlos and some itlain dude who are gay regs at aspers?

see where you are wrong is that by claiming it is "doable" you are saying that somehow skill is involved.

It isn't.

At infinity anything is possible.

35% ROI over 100 games right? PM me your screen name and agree to let me look into stats on you. If you put a less than one year time frame on this and you agree to escrow your entire side of the bet to me up front I'll probably hook you up. That's the only way you're going to get something so ridiculous to happen for you.

Exactly, that doesn't make me wrong. It makes me absolute. Do you see how you can't arugue with it, yet people are getting in line to try?

And worse, since they can't arugue the point, becuase it is fact, they change my story, just so they have something to agure. You can't sustain it over 1000, you can't do it the next 100. DUH!

Not the better your skill, the more often it will happen, that is the point we can discuss.

Oh my god, a reasonable person. Yes, this makes all the sense in the world. And yes, some solid parameters could be put in place here. Based on skill level and amount of hands played, probabilities can be set and a bet can be made.

This is such a better response, than I bet you the next 100, or I bet you can't do it over 1000. Thank you for your sanity.

arguing about ROI %... ZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZzzzzzz

seriously i think this thread would be nuthing with out me.

Actually:

So like, you're offering a stupid and pointless bet? To prove a point? What point? The point that with infinite any statistical improbability is possible? Like, thanks captain obvious, you don't really need to use rhetoric to show us that.

No, but it makes you stupid. Why do you ask us if this is doable if you know it obviously is in the first place?

Well considering that YOU offered the bet, perhaps it should've been YOUR job to set up the parameters.

This is the most ******ed thing I've seen posted in a while. Why would anyone take a bet that they can't win?

Of course it'll happen again, someday. We all told you what kind of run it was, a DIGUSTINGLY LUCKY run, and you're like "nono, i have millions of hands, i hit 2 pair exactly how many times i should have."

So if that's truly what you were looking for, you missed it when I posted it in response to probably your very first post in the forum.

I will take this bet if I get 5 shots at it.

So wait, you post a ****ing insane prop bet that is ******ed because it doesn't even have an end, and then you want to talk about other people's sanity because they propose counter-bets? For what it's worth, every other bet I saw proposed was a far more fair bet than yours. You're a ****ing idiot, I hope you never post here again. Go jack off to your graph somewhere else.

it doesn't make you absolute, it makes the statement correct that anything is statistically possible at infinity.

will it ever happen in your lifetime or generally speaking occur? who knows.

a million monkeys typing for a million years might write shakespeare but they probably spend most of their time throwing poo at one another.

skates, I don't really want to bet, as it was not brought up by me. I will give you the two minute history.

1. I just played my first 100 tournies, and had a 30% ROI. I posted the graph.
2. I also followed up saying that based on my many cash game hands, that I thought it was capable to run hotter, and that I thought I could play better. Never did I not say it was not a great run, only that I think there have and will be better runs, both by me and many others.
3. I made the comment that I thought 35 ROI over 100 was possible.
4. In the same post, I also stated that 20% is the highest long-term winrate, 15% is shark, making it clear I was talking the short term.
5. Finally I asked if other people had a similar run, and if they were long-term winners, in an effort to get some real life data regarding the run I had.

I took a world of **** storm, everyone tried to say I claimed I could run at 35%long-term and all these people wanted to make crazy bets with me., regarding things I never said. So I said if you want to bet, we will bet based on what I said. That is is DOABLE, not sustainable.

GOOD NIGHT FANS! SEE YOU TOMMROOW FOR THE HU TOURNEY!!!

I can't believe we're wasting so much time and effort on another one of these "I'm not running good" people.

I mean we've had several in the past, and we never made any headway with them, either. They just have to learn for themselves.

I was going to reply to him, but I thought it would be better to wait for sejje.

ok this post pretty much confirms you aren't for real

sick troll though, overstepped your persona just a bit much though

NO YOU MISS THE POINT. MY BET WAS THE COUNTER TO THIER BETS.

People wanted me to bet them:

That I would run 35% in the NEXT 100 hands OR
That I would run 35% in the next 1000 hands.

THEY WERE CHALLENGING ME TO TAKE THE BETS BECAUSE THEY ARE SAYING I CLAIMED THESE THINGS. SO I COUNTERED WITH A BET BASED ON WHAT I ACTUALLY SAID!

how'd i do?

hi my name is Jro and I want to become a HU SNG balla .. any tips??? Bewarez me at the $11.50 turbos on stars

dude statistically possible does not equal "doable"

Actually they're challenging you because they think it's a really easy way to win some money.

Why do you type in all caps?

Move somewhere cheaper than boca raton. Preferably out of Florida, since that place blows.

Again, putting words in my mouth. never said I wasn't running good, only that I thought I could run better.

Sejje I haven't always agreed w/ things you say in the past, but right now I have love for you!

I have special forum permission to put words into people's mouths. Deal with it (commission to steve for use of phrase).