Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register

08-27-2015 , 04:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Brice
He didn't ask his little troll friends to post. YOU offered the prop bet and I explained why I think it would be a bad idea to take it due to your shady dealings with prop bets in the past.
You were sitting in the same room, common sense prevails. I did not say he asked you to post, I inferred that he knew you posted it, then asked why it keeps getting brought up.

Secondly, I didn't do anything shady.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Brice
And we only troll because it is so easy to get a rise out of you.
You troll because you're pathetic and you've got nothing better to do, but I wouldn't expect you to ever admit that.
Quote
08-27-2015 , 07:15 PM
I can't wait until op blocks himself on 2+2
Quote
08-28-2015 , 02:23 AM
[QUOTE=cuserounder;47963409]So it's OK because you only stack him 90% of the time and he might suck out the other 10%? C'mon.



No you think ur stacking that whale 90% of the time when its gamboll gambool caused by him....check your math.. Your edge is greatly reduced and so your dough is actually at higher risk... You could be as much as 65/35 in your risk ... But w e the "grinders" wont admit this fact bc they usually fool themselves into thinking they have a huge edge which is greatly negated when a gambool maniac shows up and starts making you call down with A hi etc... Its ok to live in a dream world tho where you stack the whale 90% of the time.... But if you bother to check your equities its called variance and its real... Which is why so many "pros" go back to their moms basements eventually...
Quote
08-28-2015 , 02:45 AM
[QUOTE=Oddhalo;47968284]
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuserounder
So it's OK because you only stack him 90% of the time and he might suck out the other 10%? C'mon.



No you think ur stacking that whale 90% of the time when its gamboll gambool caused by him....check your math.. Your edge is greatly reduced and so your dough is actually at higher risk... You could be as much as 65/35 in your risk ... But w e the "grinders" wont admit this fact bc they usually fool themselves into thinking they have a huge edge which is greatly negated when a gambool maniac shows up and starts making you call down with A hi etc... Its ok to live in a dream world tho where you stack the whale 90% of the time.... But if you bother to check your equities its called variance and its real... Which is why so many "pros" go back to their moms basements eventually...
Your numbers, not mine. You said they can hit a 2 outer and take your money when you go north. 2 outers are a little less than 10%. I'd have gone with 60-70% myself. But the point remains, the more money we get in against them at any favorable percentage, the more edge we have... The more we win, the less others win and the more they lose all in the long run.... which is why going north is wrong. So your previous point still makes no sense.
Quote
08-28-2015 , 04:18 AM
Haha point proven the dumbass just likes to argue in his own thread
Quote
08-28-2015 , 09:29 AM
My ignore list is growing! Meanwhile, I'm taking a shot at the $1,675 WSOPc Main Event today... I've got a good feeling about this one as I continue to push my game to new heights.
Quote
08-28-2015 , 10:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuserounder
My ignore list is growing! Meanwhile, I'm taking a shot at the $1,675 WSOPc Main Event today... I've got a good feeling about this one as I continue to push my game to new heights.
Good luck! I definitely like the room at the Horsehoe. Ignore the haters, I read your thread and it's awesome seeing the progress throughout time.
Quote
08-28-2015 , 10:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbissick
Good luck! I definitely like the room at the Horsehoe. Ignore the haters, I read your thread and it's awesome seeing the progress throughout time.
Thanks bbissick! I like putting them in their place sometimes, but they'll never bring me down.
Quote
08-28-2015 , 11:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuserounder
You were sitting in the same room, common sense prevails. I did not say he asked you to post, I inferred that he knew you posted it, then asked why it keeps getting brought up.

Secondly, I didn't do anything shady.



You troll because you're pathetic and you've got nothing better to do, but I wouldn't expect you to ever admit that.
What you did was shady because you financially gained from naive kid just starting out in the gambling world all because you have to protect your fragile ego. Anyone with more experience would have told you to go f yourself.

Of all the quality troll material you give us 2p2 (and believe me, you give PLENTY), this is the only thing that I have called you out on.

#TeamCuse
Quote
08-28-2015 , 12:00 PM
Kind of stretching here Brice, I def am not a fan of how that all went down but claiming he took advantage of him?

Pretty lol
Quote
08-28-2015 , 12:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 11t
Kind of stretching here Brice, I def am not a fan of how that all went down but claiming he took advantage of him?

Pretty lol
Keyword is financially gained. If I had to guess, cuse didn't care about the money but just wanted the pay-off so he could claim he won the prop bet. After all, this is a dude who crushes 5/T for $260 an hr. I doubt he cared about the money.

There are plenty of scummy people who will take advantage of you in the gambling world. You wouldn't expect one of your so called friends to be one of those.
Quote
08-28-2015 , 12:38 PM
If duke is losing and says he goes north to cover a whale does cuse end the bet?
Quote
08-28-2015 , 01:20 PM
23.3K on our first break, up from 20K starting stack. Blinds going to 100/200. Got semi coolered in one spot but otherwise running good and playing well. Mediocre table draw, but nobody doing anything too great.
Quote
08-28-2015 , 01:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 11t
Kind of stretching here Brice, I def am not a fan of how that all went down but claiming he took advantage of him?

Pretty lol
Brice is on ignore and I'm not going to delve into this on break from the tourney except to say the notion I took advantage of Duke in the prop bet is just completely, utterly ridiculous. If Duke has anything to say about it, he's a grown ass man and can speak up.
Quote
08-28-2015 , 02:01 PM
So Brice talks **** and you call out Duke?
Quote
08-28-2015 , 02:06 PM
He's not calling Duke out, he's saying Duke can speak for himself he doesn't need Tim Brice talking for him.
Quote
08-28-2015 , 02:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuserounder
Brice is on ignore and I'm not going to delve into this on break from the tourney except to say the notion I took advantage of Duke in the prop bet is just completely, utterly ridiculous. If Duke has anything to say about it, he's a grown ass man and can speak up.
He is not a grown ass man though. He is a good kid with a bright future, but still a kid who was bullied into paying off a prop bet that he should have never had to. These aren't duke's words. These are my own.

He doesn't live with his parents though. Maybe that is your definition of a grown ass man?
Quote
08-28-2015 , 02:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by toosoon
So Brice talks **** and you call out Duke?
cuse likes to stick his fingers in his ears and scream 'LA-LA-LALALALA-LA" when someone calls him out.
Quote
08-28-2015 , 02:24 PM
He is attempting to make his living playing poker, has been doing so for a few years already. Plus he had to fight through a stretch of being homeless. Seems like he's gone through enough to be considered a man, not just a kid/boy.
Quote
08-28-2015 , 03:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by toosoon
So Brice talks **** and you call out Duke?


Quote:
Originally Posted by ITT666
He's not calling Duke out, he's saying Duke can speak for himself he doesn't need Tim Brice talking for him.
Exactly. I'm not calling him out, I'm calling out Brice for making an issue of something that hasn't been an issue in almost a year that was fleshed out on here in detail then. Duke agreed to the penalty he paid and he's 22 or 23 years old, he's more than old enough to have spoken up himself at any point in the ~10 months since we reached the agreement, whether that be on here, when we've texted, or when we hung out in person in Vegas.

He hasn't done that, and I consider the prop bet old news.
Quote
08-28-2015 , 04:13 PM
The whole issue was brought up because cuse offered a prop bet. Anyone reading this thread and considering taking the offer should know about his past dealings with prop bets.

I don't expect cuse to change his mind on this (does he ever?), but logical people who are thinking about taking the prop should be warned. If cuse doesn't get his way, then he will essentially take his ball and go home.
Quote
08-28-2015 , 05:51 PM
40,200 coming back to 400/800/100. Just had a short stack fish open with like 15bb and I hero folded 77 instead of jamming on him... Someone else got it in with 44 and he had 99. Saved almost a quarter of my stack.
Quote
08-28-2015 , 06:54 PM
I'm out. Ran TP2K into TPTK for about a quarter of my stack then dwindled to 22bb and resteal squeezed A8s and the second guy nitrolled me hard with AQ. I didn't improve.
Quote
08-28-2015 , 10:21 PM
[QUOTE=cuserounder;47968366]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oddhalo

Your numbers, not mine. You said they can hit a 2 outer and take your money when you go north. 2 outers are a little less than 10%. I'd have gone with 60-70% myself. But the point remains, the more money we get in against them at any favorable percentage, the more edge we have... The more we win, the less others win and the more they lose all in the long run.... which is why going north is wrong. So your previous point still makes no sense.
The 2 outer remark was just to illustrate a simple point... Not a realistic poker math scenario.... No one cares if you dont wanna go north...its just ridic niave is all..
Quote
08-28-2015 , 10:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
This is laughable. You obviously have either a personal issue with cuse or you're just a hater. You come off as disingenuous, jealous, or both.

Standard 2+2 behavior.
This. I see a bunch of insecure douche bags calling someone insecure on the interwebz. Are you kidding me? The bullyish gangup is just pathetic.

I do think ECG's comment was said in jest however and you took it WAY too serious, just my opinion though.

Last edited by PokerFiend4LYFE; 08-28-2015 at 10:47 PM.
Quote

      
m