Quote:
Originally Posted by PoorSkillz
Of course the easiest thing of all would be to just not reveal much in the depositions (assuming they had a lot to hide), let the lawyers do their job, and settle for a few million dollars (which would be covered by insurance). But that's too boring.
Yeah, you can keep going on about that even though you are not correct.
At the time all this went down, even a lawyer involved in the case could not expect the insurance to cover the entire claim which expanded to cover individual wrong-doing.
The actual settlement was done with SA extremely leveraged and unable to continue pursuing his case (for all intents and purposes) - so, the facts, or investigation of such, never rose to the level of the allegations. The allegations were very serious and the lawsuit promised major exposure.
A layperson, especially at that particular time in the matter, was not going to be privy to a complex (insurance) coverage analysis; nor would they be in a position to appreciate it. Given that, the case was a huge threat to the county, the named defendants, and those in LE.
As to LuckProofs comment about it being easier to just kill SA: No kidding. How do you know that wasn't thought about. If there was a nefarious plan underway, how do you know the plan was NOT to kill SA and then this opportunity came out of nowhere and they changed course?
You don't know. Is any of this illogical or unreasonable? It sure is, however, the final decision on what is "crazy" depends on context. In a "normal" situation, we would not be talking about planting evidence, conspiracies, etc. Those things usually do not happen. But when you look at all of the questionable things in this case, it is quite unreasonable to simply brush it off and rely on how improbable it all is - especially when that seems to be the only response to each issue raised.
At some point, if those defending the cops want us to rely on "how ridiculous" it all is, a clear narrative explaining everything will have to be offered.
I am able to look at these things with an open mind, and thus far, I have to say I simply cannot accept - "the odds of something like this happening are so low, that we can simply rule it out."