Trying to sell this book?

PoorSkillz maybe should take up more honest work, like helping Nigerian Princes getting their money out of frozen bank accounts.

Now you're just being obtuse.

You are going down the semantic rabbit hole with proudfootz, it's not worth it.

It is clear to anyone with a shred of common sense that if the car was really impounded by the police on Nov 3, and "found" half-hidden on Avery's property on Nov 5, that the police had to plant it there and that it had to involve several people. He is trying to claim there are other possible explanations but of course there aren't, and that's OK because the police frame-job conspiracy is what he believes anyway.

No, I'm actually not.

Yeah. That's what was weird about poorskillz. He was linking some weird websites aswell 6 months ago that's why most regular here think he definitely is a shill account.
I would love that our investigators itt find if poorskillz is posting in the Steven avery is guilty subreddit

The state will not appeal. If they appeal, there's the threat of a retrial. If there's a retrial, everyone involved is going to be ripped apart. As KZ said, it's over.

lOl Eddy, Skillz was the 1st to post links to the guilty site's, that's another sure bet you got there pal.
I think I know but won't post as he has not posted mine.

pm me your guess i d like to see if he is suspisciously shill like on reddit aswell.

Tricia Bushnell (Midwest Innocence Project) withdraws from Steven's counsel.

Bushnell is off to set other innocent convicts free!

Here she talks about other irons she has in the fire:

http://www.kshb.com/news/only-on-41-...ing-a-murderer

^^ http://www.stevenaverycase.org/wp-co...nce-9-1-16.pdf

T.B. Request to withdraw from the case.
http://www.stevenaverycase.org/wp-co...nce-9-2-16.pdf

http://molawyersmedia.com/2016/08/05...-new-director/

Nice! A promotion.

so have the police stated whether that paper was legit or not or commented? how did that not come up in the trial?

I assume the correct play is to see if the person who typed it in is still alive & can the time stamp be altered, sorry fixed, oops again is correct.
That may take some time.

Withdrew or was replaced?

Attorney Steven Richards specializes in.
http://www.erattorney.com/areas-of-p...ederal-crimes/

The cops Dindu Nuffin

Ay'e Teh we ****ers got skelped & sti'l dingheid us, Uh we'l Teh get a doin soon enuf.

OK, so you are alleging you know how their records work?

And also I assume, would be able to find other documents that were logged before they were discovered? Such as the key?

I love how you guys spend hundreds of pages on how incompetent the entire police department was, but when it comes to a date on a form the only possible explanation is the cops secretly had the car 2 days before it was found. Because using the reported missing date, or simply making a typo, is just not possible for the highly trained clerical professional who types these things up.

Cause a typo would much more likely be post dated and not pre dated. And everyone agree it could be a typo but that's still something huge to check since proving it's a typo is not that hard unless it wasn't a typo where the explanation have to match other paperwork and database entry.

OK I am going to try and talk sense which means it will undoubtedly fall on deaf ears.

This date you are all arguing about is from a summary report of the investigation. It is not some form used to check in evidence to the station as it arrives. It is not an impound log. It was prepared after Avery's arrest.

The top of the summary report lists the basics of the case. Case #, witnesses, arrests, property, etc. The rest of the report is made up of narrative statements from the investigators.

In the top section, under property, is listed the Rav4 as "Code 6 - EVIDENCE/SEIZED".

So... this is a car that was evidence in the case. It now has the status of "seized" - since as of the time of the writing of the summary report, it had been seized by the police. The date is listed as Nov 3, which is the date the case was first reported (Nov 3 is listed at the very top of the report as "Reported Date" for the case). Nowhere does it state the car was seized ON Nov. 3rd - only that it is evidence in the case dated Nov 3rd, and now has a status of seized.

Interestingly enough, the only other "property" listed on the summary report, is "Teresa Halbach kidnapped" - also listed under the date Nov 3rd. I don't know if that is just a note, or if it refers to her remains, or other personal property of hers that was found.

Nobody give a **** about yours or anyone theory. That's a significant detail that require an official explanation and that explanation better be rock solid. And they might have a credible explanation and it's possible that they just ignore common paperwork practice because paperwork is boring.
Or it might not be a typo and someone not involved in a framing process might have logged the car properly.
No one outside of LE will be able to answer that until it's investigated.