Quote:
Originally Posted by lkasigh
The evidence that there is a mistake on the document is that the car was found by a search party on Nov. 5.
If it was found on Nov. 3, logged into evidence on Nov. 3, then taken out of evidence and moved to Avery's lot before Nov. 5, this process would have involved multiple persons engaged in committing and covering up criminal acts, i.e., by definition a conspiracy.
You are going down the semantic rabbit hole with proudfootz, it's not worth it.
It is clear to anyone with a shred of common sense that if the car was really impounded by the police on Nov 3, and "found" half-hidden on Avery's property on Nov 5, that the police had to plant it there and that it had to involve several people. He is trying to claim there are other possible explanations but of course there aren't, and that's OK because the police frame-job conspiracy is what he believes anyway.