what games were they in ? and did they get banned ?

There is an easy fix to this though. What is sublime's loss rate at a table with 5 kanus? You quit early you pay the table (18-hands play)*that. As it stands, optimal play for the BHs: join table starters if there are no marks at the table, 2/3 just play free hands and leave. Forget about leeching games they're going to be stealing EV from you.

I played them at 5/10, maybe they moved up/down though without me getting at their tables.
And yes, they got banned ofc.

Edit:
they weren't regulars, just two random guys from the same country that both started playing at the same time and played a ton of hands together/multiway.

why are there 20 tables with only 1 guy sitting at 2/4 and 3/6
you guys know this was the reason to implement table starters at 5/10 right, and table starters isnt going so well imo

Because of people with severe brain damage

yea, it's really tilting, why would pokerstars allow that (especially with ppl not willing to actually play when another reg sits down). also I don't think it's good when mystersy etc (willing to play 3handed+ at least) opens 3 tables or more at 10/20 every time...

Instead of trying to come up with ******ed solutions, Stars should just limit the number of spawning tables when not full. Like max 4 tables with less than 4 players or something. I really don't see why we need a clogged lobby with 50 tables with only 1 guy sitting.

This. I mean, why not TRY this at the very least? I'd say just limit the number of tables that aren't running. Also, no camping. The 2 people sitting on the table thing is a horrible rule. If you don't start HU, get off the table IMO.

This + you can't come back to this table in 15 minutes or something.

^^ those 4 posts are right on the money, and it shouldnt be difficult to implement for stars

idk, but with all the scripting going on I dont blame ppl for sitting at empty tables just to not miss out on action. I start a lot but dont really care if they sit out oppose to me.

Even when I'm not reading 2p2, TimStone manages to tilt me...

hahah too good

that's because teh timstone is moar than just a pokerplayer

Table starters is so awful.. I want to start a table by playing hu with an other 100bb reg, not with 3 shorties and a solid regular. :-/

I love table starters, it's even easier to grim people now !

Table Starters rllly sux !

YOU really suck, opening tons of tables without any intension of actually starting the table.

Only worse is NutPopper, he used to play 2 hands, leave the table and open a new one within 2 min, but today he decided to just start grimming me every time I sit down before he leaves and opens a new table. When confronted in chat he even told me that I shouldn't sit at his tables if I don't wanna get grimmed every hand

Sent stars an e-mail, hope they will do sth about it... I'm really tilted right now as so many players can open tables without intension of playing any non-fish, wonder how long it takes stars to limit amount of tables without hands beeing dealt - how complicated can that even be ???

Would ppl ITT be willing to spend a few minutes every hour of their session to sit at tables with scums that aren't willing to play to make them either leave or sit out at least?

Status quo is really tilting and noone knows how long it will take PS to limit amount of tables

Lobby looks like **** and the ppl who actually start tables are beeing disadvantaged for not getting all the fish!

I feel like if we get a few players to do that it's not even that distracting while playing but a very effective way of making the easy bumhunting much harder and the lobby more attractive to the recs.

Thoughts?

umrell doesnt play me and i talked with another regular who sits with umrell aswell and he doesnt play him either.

cant believe the guy keeps doing this without having people doing something about it

there is a bunch of ppl doing this, if more ppl show interest in taking actions it should be easy to make a list with 15-30ppl who do the exact same thing every day...

I have to just say, as a reg who sat at 3/6 for the first time today (who usually plays zoom but it was sort of dead late at night), to be seatscripted and auto sat beside by sublime really put me off my session. It just makes you feel like youre a terrible player and you're his target.


And this is coming from someone who was confidence in their game and really isn't worried about most guys at midstakes.

I can't imagine how big of a put off it must be for some random guy who plays once a month and is a large lifetime loser but wants to have a little fun.

I guess the best way to summarize this post would be.

Dear Sublime: I want to punch you in the face. Twice. Once for me and once for everyone else who also wants to punch you in the face but hasn't gotten the chance.



On a seperate note, how does the seatscript work? Does it target me because it hasn't seen me at the tables he's played at before? Or do i just suck secretly and not know?

you could say that about any bumhunter. i think it's extremely likely you are a reg who is pissed off by sublime and you try to act like an angry fish to get stars to do something

Perhaps I was a little tilted and my previous post is too harsh. I don't know - I haven't played here long enough-. But I can certainly see how being auto sat next to could really put some fish off playing. it certainly put me off playing as you can tell from my last post.

Aside from the obvious advantage it confers on the guys using it I think they should be banned simply because they make fish less inclined to play.

I guess I'm probably preaching to the choir here but I'm looking to help in any way possible. I realize most guys that don't have a lot of posts don't get a whole lot of credit around here but if i can help in any way please PM me and let me know how i can contribute.

Thanks guys, good luck

yeah i agree it should be banned, but the fish gets annoyed argument isn't really enough, since bumhunting is what really annoys them and not the script itself