Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Official 2008 FTP Regulars Thread The Official 2008 FTP Regulars Thread

12-24-2008 , 08:48 PM
thank god, merry xmas
12-24-2008 , 08:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JooWish622
The deep tables take longer to fill.

+ we don't play at the same time often enough for it to actually hurt your rate or player pool.

Chill.
faaaaaaaaaagggggggggggggooooooooooootttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttt

start deep tables u piece of ****
12-24-2008 , 09:39 PM
Merry Christmas friends, I hope we all remember this holiday that in the grand scheme of things, the money and the grind isn't important at all
12-24-2008 , 09:47 PM
FlopNutsOnYou on tilt, prob played with a few of you over the last few days, put in around 15k hands mostly at 2/4. Only just started playing cash again, after playing tourneys for a few months.

GL and have a good christmas

Last edited by Try__An__Hit; 12-24-2008 at 09:53 PM.
12-24-2008 , 10:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JooWish622
The deep tables take longer to fill.

+ we don't play at the same time often enough for it to actually hurt your rate or player pool.

Chill.
no by you starting non deep tables up is going to have an effect after you leave too. and they dont take longer to fill up unless you like them filling up with shortstacks dumbass.
12-24-2008 , 10:08 PM
who is this new euro wannabe lagtard playing...

rikson??

cant wait to get back home on my setup so i can sit at all of his tables... is he one of u guys?
12-24-2008 , 10:14 PM
LOL, i played him HU at 1/2 today in work, he def wasn't lagtarded.
12-24-2008 , 10:28 PM
i meannnn..merry christmas oz

Full Tilt Poker Game #9670425340: Table Held (deep 6) - $25/$50 - No Limit Hold'em - 21:25:45 ET - 2008/12/24
Seat 1: mastrblastr ($12,916)
Seat 2: tablekill ($6,157.50)
Seat 3: GooGie MonA ($1,300)
Seat 4: 20 Buck Spin ($13,320)
Seat 5: Ozzy 87 ($8,769)
Seat 6: luvtheWNBA ($9,925)
GooGie MonA posts the small blind of $25
20 Buck Spin posts the big blind of $50
The button is in seat #2
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Ozzy 87 raises to $150
luvtheWNBA folds
mastrblastr folds
tablekill raises to $250
GooGie MonA folds
20 Buck Spin folds
Ozzy 87 raises to $825
tablekill raises to $1,400
Ozzy 87 has 15 seconds left to act
Ozzy 87 raises to $2,600
tablekill calls $1,200
*** FLOP *** [6d 3c 5s]
Ozzy 87 bets $6,169, and is all in
tablekill has 15 seconds left to act
tablekill calls $3,557.50, and is all in
Ozzy 87 shows [Kd Kc]
tablekill shows [Kh Qc]
Uncalled bet of $2,611.50 returned to Ozzy 87
*** TURN *** [6d 3c 5s] [Jc]
*** RIVER *** [6d 3c 5s Jc] [8c]
Ozzy 87 shows a pair of Kings
tablekill shows King Queen high
Ozzy 87 wins the pot ($12,387) with a pair of Kings
tablekill is sitting out
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $12,390 | Rake $3
Board: [6d 3c 5s Jc 8c]
Seat 1: mastrblastr didn't bet (folded)
Seat 2: tablekill (button) showed [Kh Qc] and lost with King Queen high
Seat 3: GooGie MonA (small blind) folded before the Flop
Seat 4: 20 Buck Spin (big blind) folded before the Flop
Seat 5: Ozzy 87 showed [Kd Kc] and won ($12,387) with a pair of Kings
Seat 6: luvtheWNBA didn't bet (folded)
12-24-2008 , 11:25 PM
wtf is going on in that hand
12-24-2008 , 11:36 PM
for all my fans out there


BabyJesus22: no ty
FoldTOcash: ID LIKE TO PLAY POKER PLEASE
FoldTOcash: ISNT THAT WHAT THESE R FOR?
FoldTOcash: u might win big vs me
BabyJesus22: i dont wish to play you, no ty
FoldTOcash: like u did vs babyjesus23
FoldTOcash: i heard hes a huge fish tho
BabyJesus22: yeah he sucks balls
FoldTOcash: no wonder u crushed him
BabyJesus22: it wouldnt let me player transfer
BabyJesus22: so i had to chip dump
BabyJesus22: it was too new of account
FoldTOcash: that seems to me, definitely worse than blocking
tables
FoldTOcash: hmmm
BabyJesus22: so i had to chip dump
12-25-2008 , 02:00 AM
plz report that chat to ftp ace.
12-25-2008 , 02:26 AM
isuck0nu can suck my balls
12-25-2008 , 02:57 AM
I honestly don't see anything wrong with what he did. He couldn't make a big player to player transfer, so he made a new screename that is basically exactly the same as his old name so he could get rakeback, presumable. How many people have made new account to get rakeback and picked totally different names? Or have just created totally different accounts so people wouldn't have reads on them? What he did really isn't a big deal at all, reporting him would just be a dick move.
12-25-2008 , 03:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokeriseasy
I honestly don't see anything wrong with what he did. He couldn't make a big player to player transfer, so he made a new screename that is basically exactly the same as his old name so he could get rakeback, presumable. How many people have made new account to get rakeback and picked totally different names? Or have just created totally different accounts so people wouldn't have reads on them? What he did really isn't a big deal at all, reporting him would just be a dick move.
Yeah agree
12-25-2008 , 03:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TronSpecial
no by you starting non deep tables up is going to have an effect after you leave too. and they dont take longer to fill up unless you like them filling up with shortstacks dumbass.
jesus...
12-25-2008 , 03:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffmet3
he probably didn't have rakeback on one of the accounts, or the account was in someone else's name or something similar to that and then he just dumped the money rather then transfer it.

not really that big of a deal, and considering he made the name as close as possible, he obviously wasn't trying to multiaccount and trick other people.

not nearly as scummy as when plenty of people on here have gotten new names that were completely different from their original ones and then just began playing on them without telling anyone.
as i said, its just because people dont like him
12-25-2008 , 03:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokeriseasy
I honestly don't see anything wrong with what he did. He couldn't make a big player to player transfer, so he made a new screename that is basically exactly the same as his old name so he could get rakeback, presumable. How many people have made new account to get rakeback and picked totally different names? Or have just created totally different accounts so people wouldn't have reads on them? What he did really isn't a big deal at all, reporting him would just be a dick move.

oh I don't wanna report him. But IIRC he has threatened people in the past for reporting them, when they "block" his tables. someone who has clearly violated the T&C of the site probably shouldn't be trying to ask FTP to help them bumhunt(as there is no clear rule against sitting at the table of someone who doesn't want to play you)

oh and he is prob the worst at sitting at multiple games per limit. But now that he occasionally plays regs, looks like Im gonna be stopping by his tables often!
12-25-2008 , 03:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AceCR9
oh I don't wanna report him. But IIRC he has threatened people in the past for reporting them, when they "block" his tables. someone who has clearly violated the T&C of the site probably shouldn't be trying to ask FTP to help them bumhunt(as there is no clear rule against sitting at the table of someone who doesn't want to play you)

oh and he is prob the worst at sitting at multiple games per limit. But now that he occasionally plays regs, looks like Im gonna be stopping by his tables often!

this.

im not some douche bag that is all about reporting ppl but this guy runs around like kaintd reporting ppl who sit w/ him and being a bitch in general. id just shrug and ignore it if he wasnt a douche to begin w/. fwiw tho i didnt report him cause i dont really care that much.

i would report mebster tho if i could find something to report him for...that guys def got something coming.
12-25-2008 , 03:56 AM
please report babyjesus.

also joowish is gay
12-25-2008 , 04:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcorbin16
who is this new euro wannabe lagtard playing...

rikson??

cant wait to get back home on my setup so i can sit at all of his tables... is he one of u guys?
i 2 tabled him at 25/50 not too long ago and he's like semi-competent i guess.....certainly not good. he was lagtarded too IME
12-25-2008 , 05:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JooWish622
jesus...
it's -ev for everyone, including yourself.

it's just stupid.

it tilts the **** out of me, especially since you play a bunch and start tables a lot.

do you understand the extent to which competent shortstackers hurt your win rate?
12-25-2008 , 11:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcorbin16
also joowish is gay
.
12-25-2008 , 11:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tannenj
it's -ev for everyone, including yourself.

it's just stupid.

it tilts the **** out of me, especially since you play a bunch and start tables a lot.

do you understand the extent to which competent shortstackers hurt your win rate?
I guess I don't notice.
12-25-2008 , 12:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tannenj
it's -ev for everyone, including yourself.

it's just stupid.

it tilts the **** out of me, especially since you play a bunch and start tables a lot.

do you understand the extent to which competent shortstackers hurt your win rate?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JooWish622
I guess I don't notice.
Not that I care what you do - to each his own - but you don't notice when a skilled shortstacker negates pretty much any advantage that you have over him in terms of position or postflop skill? And that the shortstacker is taking up a seat that could be occupied by tenking instead? If you don't want to play deep, fine, but set your standard buyin to 100BBs and sit at the deep table with half a stack.
12-25-2008 , 12:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrewOnTilt
Not that I care what you do - to each his own - but you don't notice when a skilled shortstacker negates pretty much any advantage that you have over him in terms of position or postflop skill? And that the shortstacker is taking up a seat that could be occupied by tenking instead? If you don't want to play deep, fine, but set your standard buyin to 100BBs and sit at the deep table with half a stack.
Yeah, I dunno. I usually get up and leave if the table fills with 4 SS. But if there's 1 SS and a bunch of 40-60bb stacks who don't know to play, then I think the game is profitable... so I play + I think I own most SS.

Sure, I will try to start more deep tables... but I think Tcorbin and Tannej's reactions are a little much.

      
m