The Official 2008 FTP Regulars Thread
11-19-2008
, 07:07 PM
11-19-2008
, 07:08 PM
11-19-2008
, 07:14 PM
11-19-2008
, 07:15 PM
11-19-2008
, 07:29 PM
Quote:
on another note anyone want to let me know what it is like to play against me? I have always been curious about this because i am the only player that i will never have a chance to play against. to prove that i am not trying to gain an edge by knowing what others think of me (which i am sure most people will think when i ask this) i will give an honest assessment of anyone's game and what it's like to play against you, if you do the same for me.
am i spewy? nitty? awkward style? whatever else you may think when playing at the same table as me.
am i spewy? nitty? awkward style? whatever else you may think when playing at the same table as me.
I thought you were decent(note: people who I say are "good" are top 10/20 players). you seemed kinda straightforward, but not overly abc- imo a good style for beating 2/4- 5/10, but not the best for 10/20. There's definitely a need to dumb down your game when moving from 10/20 to 5/10, people are playing way more tables on average and tend not to be thinking too deeply. Probably why my 10/20 6m wr>>> my 5/10 6m wr, and it will prob always be this way. now only if 10/20 ever had more than 2 games running...
you were someone who I think of as a non-factor at the table(if we were playing 10/20 especially)- I'm not going out of my way to play pots with you, but I won't avoid you like I might a ansky or samH. being a "non factor" doesn't mean you aren't a winner, just that I don't view you as a tough player to play vs.
tell me how bad I am!
11-19-2008
, 07:41 PM
11-19-2008
, 08:18 PM
Quote:
I thought you were decent(note: people who I say are "good" are top 10/20 players). you seemed kinda straightforward, but not overly abc- imo a good style for beating 2/4- 5/10, but not the best for 10/20. There's definitely a need to dumb down your game when moving from 10/20 to 5/10, people are playing way more tables on average and tend not to be thinking too deeply. Probably why my 10/20 6m wr>>> my 5/10 6m wr, and it will prob always be this way. now only if 10/20 ever had more than 2 games running...
you were someone who I think of as a non-factor at the table(if we were playing 10/20 especially)- I'm not going out of my way to play pots with you, but I won't avoid you like I might a ansky or samH. being a "non factor" doesn't mean you aren't a winner, just that I don't view you as a tough player to play vs.
tell me how bad I am!
you were someone who I think of as a non-factor at the table(if we were playing 10/20 especially)- I'm not going out of my way to play pots with you, but I won't avoid you like I might a ansky or samH. being a "non factor" doesn't mean you aren't a winner, just that I don't view you as a tough player to play vs.
tell me how bad I am!
You realize there is a site you could play with more 10/20 tables running...you addicted to FT?
11-19-2008
, 08:48 PM
Quote:
I thought you were decent(note: people who I say are "good" are top 10/20 players). you seemed kinda straightforward, but not overly abc- imo a good style for beating 2/4- 5/10, but not the best for 10/20. There's definitely a need to dumb down your game when moving from 10/20 to 5/10, people are playing way more tables on average and tend not to be thinking too deeply. Probably why my 10/20 6m wr>>> my 5/10 6m wr, and it will prob always be this way. now only if 10/20 ever had more than 2 games running...
you were someone who I think of as a non-factor at the table(if we were playing 10/20 especially)- I'm not going out of my way to play pots with you, but I won't avoid you like I might a ansky or samH. being a "non factor" doesn't mean you aren't a winner, just that I don't view you as a tough player to play vs.
tell me how bad I am!
you were someone who I think of as a non-factor at the table(if we were playing 10/20 especially)- I'm not going out of my way to play pots with you, but I won't avoid you like I might a ansky or samH. being a "non factor" doesn't mean you aren't a winner, just that I don't view you as a tough player to play vs.
tell me how bad I am!
11-19-2008
, 08:53 PM
11-19-2008
, 09:40 PM
11-19-2008
, 10:11 PM
11-19-2008
, 10:11 PM
11-19-2008
, 10:24 PM
i think you're correct here, especially when i get in a spewy mood. i wouldnt be shocked if Nick Rivers turned out to be someone good, even though that probably pain some of u guys to hear. I'm not really sure what u mean by fundamentals tho. I would say what i think of you if i knew who u were
11-19-2008
, 10:31 PM
11-19-2008
, 10:55 PM
11-19-2008
, 10:55 PM
11-19-2008
, 11:00 PM
11-19-2008
, 11:01 PM
Quote:
ahhh... Saw his name around donkament scores but didn't realize he was that much of a killer. Totally agree that the majority of tourney regs are pretty meh at cash. IWEARGOGGLES actually isn't that bad though. Being serious now. That's why Sunday is the best day to play imo. Tourney donks wanting to screw around with cash games after they bust.
Also, I wish I was better at donkaments
Also, I wish I was better at donkaments
And obviously I posted what I posted before just to stir the pot a little and see what the counterarguments were.
11-19-2008
, 11:12 PM
Quote:
on another note anyone want to let me know what it is like to play against me? I have always been curious about this because i am the only player that i will never have a chance to play against. to prove that i am not trying to gain an edge by knowing what others think of me (which i am sure most people will think when i ask this) i will give an honest assessment of anyone's game and what it's like to play against you, if you do the same for me.
am i spewy? nitty? awkward style? whatever else you may think when playing at the same table as me.
am i spewy? nitty? awkward style? whatever else you may think when playing at the same table as me.