*******HU CASH Regs thread******* - Page 124 - Micro Stakes Pot Limit and No Limit

Two Plus Two Forums Poker Strategy Online No-Limit Hold’em Cash

*******HU CASH Regs thread*******

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 124 of 2195

First

24 74 104 114 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 134 144 174 224 324 624 1124

Last

Page 124 of 2195

First

24 74 104 114 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 134 144 174 224 324 624 1124

Last

03-14-2009 , 12:50 AM

#3076

insidemanpoker

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 3,590

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andykay

Like I said, I don't see why everyone wants a capped number of tables.

That's bad for action in general because with the number of regs on FTP no fish will ever get a game. All the regs will just be forced into playing each other for the tables and that will be that.

Capping the number of empty tables you are allowed to sit at is a much much better option.

-Andy

true

Quote

03-14-2009 , 12:59 AM

#3077

Andykay

adept

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 985

Quote:

Originally Posted by StreamlineR

nope you're wrong, the fish will get games with the best regs since the bad regs are not gonna play the best regs.

But there are tons and tons of FTP regs who are very similar in skill level at each given limit. If i've got a 1ptBB or 2ptBB edge on someone, do you have any idea how long that's going to take to be realised? If there's 25 tables at each limit, they're going to be filled with almost identically skilled regs battling it out for minute edges and no tables for any fish to sit. So everyone loses.

-Andy

Quote

03-14-2009 , 01:21 AM

#3078

StreamlineR

veteran

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 2,963

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andykay

yeah so you'll have to get better to get a bigger edge. I agree it's going to be tougher for everyone though.

Quote

03-14-2009 , 01:26 AM

#3079

sejje

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 6,426

lol

Quote

03-14-2009 , 01:41 AM

#3080

Andykay

adept

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 985

Quote:

Originally Posted by StreamlineR

yeah so you'll have to get better to get a bigger edge. I agree it's going to be tougher for everyone though.

That's not really the right response? You're saying this suggestion is going to make it tougher and that we should do that, when a cap on the number of empties someone can be on achieves a very similar end without that factor?

Your suggestion almost completely shuts out most of the massive fish that sustain the HU economy, at least on FTP. That's not a good thing, no matter how you spin it...

-Andy

Quote

03-14-2009 , 01:52 AM

#3081

whyzze

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 5,266

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andykay

lol...that was a worst case scenario. you are misunderstanding. Its under the assumption that it will be much easier for FTP to cap the number of tables than the number of open tables (im pretty sure they used to cap the 50nl HU games, someone correct me if im wrong).

ftp's track record with adding features is horrendous...I don't feel like waiting 8 months for this happen. If we are bitching now they are going to solve it soonish and not 8 month from now.

Last edited by whyzze; 03-14-2009 at 01:55 AM. Reason: mostly speculation ldo

Quote

03-14-2009 , 02:03 AM

#3082

StreamlineR

veteran

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 2,963

yeah don't get me wrong i'm more for an open tables cap than an all tables cap

Quote

03-14-2009 , 02:04 AM

#3083

Andykay

adept

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 985

Quote:

Originally Posted by whyzze

Well dude, there is already a cap on the number of tables on FTP, but it's really quite high.

If they reduce it significantly I don't think it's going to help the games at all. All that is going to happen is, you're going to have Mebster sitting on 10 tables at once refusing to play anyone, everyone will table block all the people like him and no games will run. And there will be nothing anyone can really do about it...

-Andy

Quote

03-14-2009 , 02:11 AM

#3084

whyzze

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 5,266

eventually mebster will give up and a new era will begin.

even number of open tables has a major flaw...mebster sits at 16 tables, reg sits with mebster, mebster sits out, pops up the new table that just spawned and we are back where we started.

Quote

03-14-2009 , 02:16 AM

#3085

Andykay

adept

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 985

Yea obviously it has issues too, but it's a better option.

-Andy

Quote

03-14-2009 , 03:58 AM

#3086

Casper05

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 7,181

UgotWOFLd is a bitch

Quote

03-14-2009 , 04:44 AM

#3087

hobokes

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 6,344

capping the number of tables would be ******ed b/c all the regs will be battling, and fish literally WONT be able to play b/c all the tables will be full of 2p2'tards blocking each other and fighting over 1ptbb/100

be careful what you wish for 2p2

Quote

03-14-2009 , 04:45 AM

#3088

QueenDua12

banned

Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 27

THIS ****** POKERDICEG joins every single tables waiting list at 50nL HU and never even plays a hand. GOd its so annoying wtf

Quote

03-14-2009 , 04:47 AM

#3089

putdaWHUMPonum

old hand

Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 1,338

just cap how many tables ppl can sit at and not play?

Quote

03-14-2009 , 04:58 AM

#3090

Casper05

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 7,181

JESUS STOP BITCHING ABOUT BUMHUNTING. ITS GOING TO HURT ALL OF YOUR BOTTOM LINES. MINE TOO. SO **** OFF AND SHUT UP. YOU AREN'T GOING TO LIKE HOW THEY "FIX IT".

side note:
Full Tilt Poker $1/$2 Pot Limit Hold'em - 6 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter Powered By DeucesCracked.com

BTN: $403.85
SB: $67.45
BB: $471.40
Hero (UTG): $263.05
MP: $182.40
CO: $200.00

Pre Flop: ($3.00) Hero is UTG with 4

Hero raises to $7, MP calls $7, CO raises to $30, 3 folds, Hero raises to $99, 1 fold, CO raises to $200 all in, Hero calls $101

Flop: ($410.00) 7

Turn: ($410.00) J

River: ($410.00) J

Final Pot: $410.00
Hero shows 4

(a full house, Sevens full of Jacks)
CO shows T

(two pair, Jacks and Tens)
Hero wins $407.00
(Rake: $3.00)

AgCoach05: GG all!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Fidodell: so leave already douche
LePetomaine: fk off coach

Quote

03-14-2009 , 11:42 AM

#3091

lesmurphy7

banned

Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 1,339

I'm guessing pokerdiceg's days are numbered. I got an email back from ftp support saying they are conducting an invesitgation into our boy. Unfortunately, they can't release the results, but i'm guessing he won't be seeing him on every waitlist for much longer

Quote

03-14-2009 , 01:55 PM

#3092

hobokes

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 6,344

Quote:

Originally Posted by Casper05

JESUS STOP BITCHING ABOUT BUMHUNTING. ITS GOING TO HURT ALL OF YOUR BOTTOM LINES. MINE TOO. SO **** OFF AND SHUT UP. YOU AREN'T GOING TO LIKE HOW THEY "FIX IT".

this

Quote

03-14-2009 , 06:09 PM

#3093

Grow

HU Forum Photographer

Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 3,249

I'm all for either a cap per player or a total cap on the number of tables. You guys complaining about it are the bums who can only beat the fish and would have to drop down in limits.

Quote

03-14-2009 , 06:12 PM

#3094

eX3cution

old hand

Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 1,381

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grow

I'm all for either a cap per player or a total cap on the number of tables. You guys complaining about it are the bums who can only beat the fish and who think that you would have to drop down in limits.

FYP.

A cap per player would actually bring in more fish since it would make the HU scene a lot less intimidating.

Quote

03-14-2009 , 06:12 PM

#3095

SaintTrope

banned

Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 23

lol why is he even bothering?

Quote

03-15-2009 , 03:05 AM

#3096

quicksand

grinder

Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 431

4 tables per player should solve the problem.

Quote

03-15-2009 , 03:15 AM

#3097

augie_

missed out on bitcoin

Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 21,627

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grow

I'm all for either a cap per player or a total cap on the number of tables.

a cap on the total number of tables is idiotic. a cap on the number of tables one person can sit is the obvious solution.

Quote:

You guys complaining about it are the bums who can only beat the fish and would have to drop down in limits.

no. nooooooo..NO NO NO!!! this is just stupid. some of us play poker for money, you play it for the...glory? i feel stupid saying that about ssnl. the challenge? sounds like fun. enjoy ur challenge, i don't want to be a part of it.

Quote

03-15-2009 , 03:21 AM

#3098

augie_

missed out on bitcoin

Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 21,627

also, grow, i challenge u to a HU grudge match, but only when i am rly bored and literally have nothing better to do

Quote

03-15-2009 , 04:38 AM

#3099

bandonlooper1

old hand

Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 1,548

Quote:

Originally Posted by lesmurphy7

Quote:

Originally Posted by QueenDua12

THIS ****** POKERDICEG joins every single tables waiting list at 50nL HU and never even plays a hand. GOd its so annoying wtf

yeah i just cant figure out whats going on here. i have been playing a lot of hands of 50 hu this month at all diff hours of the day and he is there non stop

best i can come up with:
some sorta data mining program that auto opens tables of certain players he wants to data mine?