Quote:
Originally Posted by kioshk
I really enjoyed De Palma, Noah Baumbach's documentary of Brian De Palma's career. It's pretty simple, most of it is just De Palma talking to the camera about his movies and where he was in his life while he was making them. I've always been interested in De Palma, and I rarely even notice how a film is directed or the artsy stuff. His images always looked distinctly different to me. You get a real sense of the kind of person he is from this film, and that's plenty.
Liked it as well.
I saw
The Untouchables and don't know what to make of it. The tone is weird, it's over-the-top nostalgic lawful-patriotic. In favor of Prohibition enforcers? De Palma showed mastery of tone as early as Carrie (baiting you into a romantic or wistful feel, switching instantly to terror, then ending with humor all within a few seconds) so he's not going to mess that up all of a sudden, especially in an otherwise serious film where he still got to put a ridiculous Odessa Steps parody. So it feels to me like:
1) Morricone gave him a score more operatic and romantic than he wanted, and he had to go with it.
2) He had the opportunity to make a big budget movie with GOAT actors under certain story constraints, and he took it.
If anyone has different interpretations of the film (like that it's not meant to be taken as a straight-up gangster fighting movie), do tell.
(Found this thread, where the OP hates it. The OP's hatred has done a lot to sway me in the movie's favor, as many of the complaints are clear cases of not getting it:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=465587)
L.A. Confidential - First, if you've never watched through the end of the credits you've made a mistake.
This is really good, one of the best detective movies I've seen. Still, could be better. I'd prefer if everything weren't so tied into one neat conspiratorial bow. There could have been different threads, some wrapped up, some which never go anywhere, some left intentionally dangling.