Quote:
Originally Posted by Gonzirra
When I watch a QT, Hitchcock, Scorcese, Fincher movie I see all kinds of quirky telltale style direction things, which can be great if the director is good. But with Spielberg it's usually so seamless that he makes himself an almost invisible aspect of the film and there's a lot to be said for that too.
It's probably because his style shows up in so many others' that it doesn't stand out so much. I do notice things when I'm looking for them but I'm usually forgetting about the direction while watching his stuff. It's vanilla maybe but it's good vanilla.
I have several issues with Spielberg... the first of which is, I can not stop watching his movies. Several of them are probably in my top 100, but there is also a dark side to Steven Spielberg.
I find his style very formulaic in nature, specially when taken in context of his entire body of work. His movies are Controlled, Safe and with boundaries. Surely this is a... "style"... of film making, but when I see his movies, I know what I am most likely going to see before I go into the theater. Steven Spielberg is certainly no Chameleon.
The closest thing I can think of to describe watching a SS movie is "Disney like"... yet even Disney's GREAT movies of old are much more dark and sinister than Spielbergs for the most part (I am not speaking directly to movies like Saving private Ryan or Schindlers List).
Vanilla was a great analogy for a mainstream Spielberg movie, yet somehow... I don't think that does Vanilla any Justice.