Australia have done a decent job at limiting access, so have the UK, if the US Government actually wanted to do this, I'm sure they would have enough power to make it happen

You can own machine guns in some places in the US and yet they aren't used to commit crimes so why would rocket launchers

http://www.impactguns.com/store/mach...egalities.html

http://www.knobcreekrange.com/

Limiting access hasn't reduced crime in those countries and it wont in the US

sex

ungffffffffffffff

*cumzzzzzz*

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHH DONT STOP

baby youre so good just DONT STOP

No, these are the only good things to come out of Port Arthur.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_Ar...of_Port_Arthur

Ok, WSOP time! Will return to finish reading thread.

Aus and the U.S are vastly different countries in terms of current availibility, and possible import. I understand Aus is a huge landmass, however it is relativly isolated. For the U.S to limit access, it would require sweeping measures that many of its citizens (including myself) would view as trampling on our rights. I am not willing to put my trust that my government can effectively protect me at all times from criminals who will still find a way to arm themselves.

We have put the "power" of the U.S government into the war on drugs with no avail, and our war on terror has yet to get us Bin Ladin. And even then, what happens if one of the other posters in this thread at 6'4 250 decides to come into my house and beat me to death. I'm in good shape, and I'm capable of defending myself, but if one of the many guys that size decided to come into my home and cause me harm, without a weapon I don't stand a chance.

why do people feel a need to argue with people that would never agree with them in a million years

freedom of speech is more dangerous than owning a fire weapon thing imo

While OP is an idiot, pls leave someone else to defending your position. There is spell check for a reason.

Didn't say either of those bro. Just saying if you don't go looking for bears and shooting them, you'll be less likely to have them almost kill you. That's all. Keep on killing unintelligent animals brother, doesn't bother me.

KB wins <3333

When many common citizens own guns it prevents the government from becoming too powerful. Im no historian but this is one of the main principals America was founded upon. I think this was completely necc when America was founded, it may not anymore but still I do feel better that Im allowed to own a gun and that they are regulated to keep most dangerous people from owning one legaly.

I dont think gun control will solve our violent crime problems in america, I think we need a societal/governmental change in which we take care of people more in other ways so that the poverty level isnt so low. This way people will feel like they have more choices other than to become criminals.

So when multiple robbers raid your house with guns and rape your wife and daughters while your sons lay dead on the ground what are you gonna do? Use a bat or like you said, your fists?

Let me know how that works out when SHTF and chaos erupts in the very near future.

idiot

Dont have any sons so its ok. Plus i never heard of that being a reg thing her in aust. As said not many ppl own guns here

Yeah, when the economy collapses real soon you'll think differently, Guaranteed. Just because you're way in Australia doesn't mean it can't happen. People are still people.

you sir, are obv an idiot. to these men look like cowards to you!?

our economy is stronger then ever, thanks for asking

This makes no sense. You come to twoplustwo of all places to call people who own guns that aren't farmers cowards? I smell a troll.

And someone has already mentioned that you need guns to prevent a tyrannical government from taking over. History has proven this time and time again. If you're saying it can't happen in Australia, good luck with that sir.

In before Tartufo