Quote:
Originally Posted by CPHoya
This is a different way of saying what I was trying to say about how bizarre that would be if he's really a wolf. Tappo, you commented on this post as follows:
So regarding the red, what?
Regarding the second half, which is true (of course), so? What's your HOT TAKE on that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by tappokone
I wrote the red bit the wrong way around. If he's capable of believing what he's saying as a villager, then why can't he do it as a wolf, too? Does he get better at judging what arguments are bad when he rands wolf? Seems unlikely.
My take is that the post wasn't too wolfy to be wolfy.
I didn't respond to this immediately because I wanted to think about it.
Doesn't this seem a little naive (for you, anyway)? Wouldn't a wolf be at least more cautious about popping in with a random quote and vote and then bouncing than he would be if he were a villager? It's not that his WW understanding changes, but don't his motivations? He doesn't want to be wolfy if he's a wolf, yo. If he's a villager he just wants to vote some wolves, yo.
The "does he get better at judging what arguments are bad" part is the part that really stops me in my tracks. It's not about what's compelling and what's not, it's about what would draw mad heat and what won't. I guarantee you he's not making those posts to level precisely
me into clearing him for bad posting, and I guarantee you he didn't think he'd cracked the code, either.
It's like you're talking about an argument no one is making.
And then bla bla bla role mistakes bla.