Quote:
Originally Posted by HerbieGRD
If you want to show that your statement is not an opinion but a fact you should be able to provide a factual based proof of the statement. If it is, indeed, a fact, then once provided with this proof I should be forced to accept both the validity of each of the underlying facts and that those facts in combination lead indisputably to your conclusion
First off, this is hilariously naive and not true at all
Second, you seem to be saying that it is only worth having a discussion about values because if it is about facts then it is just a lecture. But then you go on to say that what I am talking about isn’t actually factual but instead is just a difference in values. Wouldn’t that mean, per your original point, it is worth discussing?