Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
POG Politics Thread POG Politics Thread

09-17-2018 , 12:35 PM
Like if someone in thread offered to educate me on the fact that abortion is murder and therefore should be punishable by death I would not see the point in engaging with them on the latter belief because I do not believe the former to be a fact
09-17-2018 , 12:37 PM
I see we have a new player!

This is for you, Herbie

It is a Yellowtail. You can identify it by the yellow tail. It is yummy!

09-17-2018 , 12:38 PM
Looks yummy - hi bigger
09-17-2018 , 12:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HerbieGRD
Only if you believe that the thing in question is actually a fact instead of a belief system based on value judgments, which I do not
Your argument has become quite circular lol
09-17-2018 , 12:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
I bring up examples itt about her only because it was a specific discussion we had itt. We have not had similar disagreements about random generic politicians. If someone came in insisting that Joe Biden was God’s gift of the left then I would probably be “bashing” him instead.
Okay, this is fair and explains most of what I was wondering about.
09-17-2018 , 12:45 PM
“Income inequality is a bad thing because it is wrong to have people that are so rich when others are so poor”

That is a value judgment

“The way to end income inequality is to give control of the means of production to society at large rather than private owners”

That is a factual observation. It may be wrong, but it is not a value judgment
09-17-2018 , 12:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
Your argument has become quite circular lol
If you want to show that your statement is not an opinion but a fact you should be able to provide a factual based proof of the statement. If it is, indeed, a fact, then once provided with this proof I should be forced to accept both the validity of each of the underlying facts and that those facts in combination lead indisputably to your conclusion

Just saying you know something doesn’t make it a fact
09-17-2018 , 12:48 PM
There is not point in have arguments about values (to some extent). If someone genuinely believes that murdering people is not wrong then what can you say? However if we both agree murder is wrong we can freely have a discussion about how to reduce murder even though we both agree it is bad
09-17-2018 , 12:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
“Income inequality is a bad thing because it is wrong to have people that are so rich when others are so poor”

That is a value judgment

“The way to end income inequality is to give control of the means of production to society at large rather than private owners”

That is a factual observation. It may be wrong, but it is not a value judgment
The second statement is not a factual statement because it isn’t true

A factual statement would be

“The way to end income inequality is to pay everyone the same amount”
09-17-2018 , 12:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HerbieGRD
If you want to show that your statement is not an opinion but a fact you should be able to provide a factual based proof of the statement. If it is, indeed, a fact, then once provided with this proof I should be forced to accept both the validity of each of the underlying facts and that those facts in combination lead indisputably to your conclusion
First off, this is hilariously naive and not true at all

Second, you seem to be saying that it is only worth having a discussion about values because if it is about facts then it is just a lecture. But then you go on to say that what I am talking about isn’t actually factual but instead is just a difference in values. Wouldn’t that mean, per your original point, it is worth discussing?
09-17-2018 , 12:52 PM
The point you are missing here Birdman is that your second statement relies on an assumption, which is

If we give control of the means of production to society at large rather than private owners then we will pay everyone the same

Which is uncertain to say the least
09-17-2018 , 12:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HerbieGRD
The second statement is not a factual statement because it isn’t true

A factual statement would be

“The way to end income inequality is to pay everyone the same amount”
“Concerned with what is actually the case rather than interpretations of or reactions to it”

Whether it is true or not is the the characteristic we are talking about. If you’ll see in my post I even say “even if it is wrong, it is still a factual discussion”
09-17-2018 , 12:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HerbieGRD
The second statement is not a factual statement because it isn’t true

A factual statement would be

“The way to end income inequality is to pay everyone the same amount”
actually that's a tautology

a factual statement would be "people today have different incomes"
09-17-2018 , 12:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HerbieGRD
The point you are missing here Birdman is that your second statement relies on an assumption, which is

If we give control of the means of production to society at large rather than private owners then we will pay everyone the same

Which is uncertain to say the least
Something being uncertain is not the same as something being value based—surely you understand that, Herbie?
09-17-2018 , 12:53 PM
For a statement like the one I originally called out it doesn’t rest on a single assumption it rests on a whole boatload of assumptions about causations and results and interactions
09-17-2018 , 12:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
Something being uncertain is not the same as something being value based—surely you understand that, Herbie?
I’m getting there
09-17-2018 , 12:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamnotawerewolf
actually that's a tautology

a factual statement would be "people today have different incomes"
Tautologies are by definition factual statements
09-17-2018 , 12:55 PM
Herbie and IANAW, you are confusing “true” or “accurate” with factual. Factual does not necessarily mean something is correct.
09-17-2018 , 12:56 PM
Quote:
If we give control of the means of production to society at large rather than private owners then we will pay everyone the same
this is not a factual statement, it is a conditional proposition

the proposition's consequent is historically, factually incorrect
09-17-2018 , 12:57 PM
If I said “the sky is purple” that is a factual statement. It is wrong, but it is factual. It is not a value judgment.

If I said “there exists intelligent life not native to the earth” that is a factual statement. It is uncertain, but it is factual. It is not a value judgment
09-17-2018 , 12:58 PM
So (and I probably wasn’t remotely clear enough of this) for a statement to be a factual statement it must rest solely on assumptions that are true regardless of the values of the person evaluating the statement. If there is so much as one assumption that requires a value judgment then it’s not fact but opinion. A statement like the one you made about means of production is a factual statement but it’s one that may or may not be true depending on whether the assumption is met
09-17-2018 , 12:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HerbieGRD
Tautologies are by definition factual statements
no, a factual statement is a description of something occurring in the real world

a tautology makes no reference to the real world; it is formulation necessitated by a particular system of semantic relationships


when birdman says "capitalism ends when imperialism ends", he is expressing a tautology. it is neither a factual statement nor a value statement.
09-17-2018 , 12:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamnotawerewolf
this is not a factual statement, it is a conditional proposition

the proposition's consequent is historically, factually incorrect
I concede that a prediction could reasonably be argued to not be factual. However, the important point is that it is not a value judgment.
09-17-2018 , 12:59 PM
Ok yeah I’m butchering my English lessons here lol
09-17-2018 , 01:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
Herbie and IANAW, you are confusing “true” or “accurate” with factual. Factual does not necessarily mean something is correct.
Right, a statement purporting to express a fact can be incorrect; it just has to purport a fact, not a conclusion or a judgment.

      
m