Open Side Menu Go to the Top

03-18-2020 , 07:37 AM
It's true for Steph but not Lebron
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal Quote
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal
$25m Guaranteed WPM on CoinPoker
Join the action now
Daily Rewards • Splash Pots • CoinRaces
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal
03-18-2020 , 08:19 AM
True for I hate this game but not for I have any chance of figuring it out.
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal Quote
03-18-2020 , 08:51 AM
It's true for Eric, but not Tempus Fugit.
It's true for Outdrawed84, but not housenuts.
It's true for Carl_Spackler, but not nails.
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal Quote
03-18-2020 , 08:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by biggerboat
True for I hate this game but not for I have any chance of figuring it out.
No doubt true in reality, but (I suspect) false in the game.
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal Quote
03-18-2020 , 08:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric
No doubt true in reality, but (I suspect) false in the game.
What do you think of post 51?
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal Quote
03-18-2020 , 09:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl_Spackler
It's true for Steph but not Lebron
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl_Spackler
What do you think of post 51?
I think that is true.
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal Quote
03-18-2020 , 09:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmazingErvin
It's true for Steph but not Lebron
Of course, this was true from the beginning.
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal Quote
03-18-2020 , 09:19 AM
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal Quote
03-18-2020 , 09:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric
Of course, this was true from the beginning.
it very well could be false in post #51
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal Quote
03-18-2020 , 09:20 AM
I suspect that:

It's true for Lebron, but not Steph.
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal Quote
03-18-2020 , 09:21 AM
Quote:

Quote:
Originally Posted by housenuts
It's true for amazing but not phenomenal
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmazingErvin
True
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by housenuts
It's true for amazing but not phenomenal

..
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmazingErvin
False =)
.
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal Quote
03-18-2020 , 09:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by housenuts
it very well could be false in post #51
True, but if there is a temporal component to the logic, then the game isn't particulary interesting, nor fun.

Even with my guess, the logic is dirty enough that I wouldn't call it too interesting/fun.
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal Quote
03-18-2020 , 09:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric
True, but if there is a temporal component to the logic, then the game isn't particulary interesting, nor fun.

Even with my guess, the logic is dirty enough that I wouldn't call it too interesting/fun.
there is clearly. i posted

It's true for amazing but not phenomenal

in successive posts. it was true in one, and false in the other.
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal Quote
03-18-2020 , 09:36 AM
Indeed. So there is something beyond the statements themselves which determines the "boolean value" of the statements. To me, this violates the spirit of this game, and certainly renders it non-enjoyable.

I also get that not everyone will feel that way.

Edit: the phrasing above is not as accurate as I wanted. Basically, if the value of the statement can change, then what's the point?
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal Quote
03-18-2020 , 10:16 AM
Usually when the game starts, the OP puts in the initial post

True of a, not of b
True of c, not of d
True of e, not of f

Here, he just made one statement. Then a separate post with one statement, then again.

So it's something with either the post # or perhaps based off the most prior true statement
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal Quote
03-18-2020 , 11:09 AM
There has to be something about the phrasing outside of the words imo
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal Quote
03-18-2020 , 11:20 AM
If this involves something stupid like post number......
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal Quote
03-18-2020 , 12:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmazingErvin
It's true for now but not at first
why "at first" and not "first"

Quote:
Originally Posted by AmazingErvin
It's true for first half but not second
Why not compare "first half" and "second half" or just "first" and "second"

Quote:
Originally Posted by AmazingErvin
It's true for the past but not future
Why not have "the" on both or neither?

Just thinking out loud. It might mean nothing and probably others have noticed
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal Quote
03-18-2020 , 02:35 PM
true: before false: now
true: for before false: for now
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal Quote
03-18-2020 , 02:36 PM
true: before false: now
true: for before false: for now

.
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal Quote
03-18-2020 , 03:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric
True, but if there is a temporal component to the logic, then the game isn't particulary interesting, nor fun.

Even with my guess, the logic is dirty enough that I wouldn't call it too interesting/fun.
I would add that it not fair as well..

A few people collated the "correct" responses into a single post. If any of those correct answers were no longer correct in a different context (like a different time, or post, etc), then we should have been advised that "correct" or "true" was a conditional construct.

The two posts by housenuts (amazing/phenomenal) seem to confirm that what is true or correct is in fact conditional.

AmazingErvin, if the true statements are/were only conditionally true, we really should have been told that. Otherwise it is a game within a game.

It would be nice to see this end and try a normal version of the game..
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal Quote
03-18-2020 , 03:15 PM
Let's at least keep the pitchforks and rope behind out backs until he actually tells us.

At this point, we may never hear from him.
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal Quote
03-18-2020 , 03:17 PM
Real talk: I'm not going to be all that troubled by it having to do with post number or something. It's a bit of a dirty trick I suppose, but it's not going to ruin my week or anything.
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal Quote
03-18-2020 , 04:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl_Spackler
Let's at least keep the pitchforks and rope behind out backs until he actually tells us.

At this point, we may never hear from him.
It is only a "conditional" or provisional pitchfork..
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal Quote
03-18-2020 , 04:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl_Spackler
Real talk: I'm not going to be all that troubled by it having to do with post number or something. It's a bit of a dirty trick I suppose, but it's not going to ruin my week or anything.
Exactly. That's why I put things the way I did, never commenting on fairness. I have no problem with whatever criteria are being used, but anything where it is possible to have the values of the statements change opens up far too many pseudorandom factors for the game to be enjoyable for me. Some people may really like that sort of thing, and this game is for them.
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal Quote
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal
$25m Guaranteed WPM on CoinPoker
Join the action now
Daily Rewards • Splash Pots • CoinRaces
IN/OUT It's true for amazing but not phenomenal

      
m